Analyzing readability of medicines information material in Slovenia.

Karin Kasesnik, Mihael Kline
Author Information
  1. Karin Kasesnik: Faculty of Social Sciences, University of Ljubljana, Kardeljeva plošcad 5, 1000 Ljubljana, Slovenia.

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: Readability has been claimed to be an important factor for understanding texts describing health symptoms and medications. Such texts may be a factor which indirectly affects the health of the population. Despite the expertise of physicians, the readability of information sources may be important for acquiring essential treatment information. The aim of this study was to measure the readability level of medicines promotion material in Slovenia.
METHODS: The Flesch readability formula was modified to comply with Slovene texts. On the basis of determining the Slovene readability algorithm, the readability ease related to the readability grade level of different Slovene texts was established. In order to estimate an adjustment of the texts to the recommended readability grade level of the targeted population, readability values of English texts were set. One sample t-test and standard deviations from the arithmetic mean values were used as statistical tests.
RESULTS: The results of the research showed low readability scores of the Slovene texts. Difficult readability values were seen in different types of examined texts: in patient information leaflets, in the summaries of product characteristics, in promotional materials, while describing over-the-counter medications and in the materials for creating disease awareness. Especially low readability values were found within the texts belonging to promotional materials intended for the physicians. None of researched items, not even for the general public, were close to primary school grade readability levels and therefore could not be described as easily readable.
CONCLUSION: This study provides an understanding of the level of readability of selected Slovene medicines information material. It was concluded that health-related texts were not compliant with general public or with healthcare professional needs.

Keywords

References

  1. Stroke. 2000 Dec;31(12):2966-70 [PMID: 11108757]
  2. Fam Med. 2002 May;34(5):383-9 [PMID: 12038721]
  3. Int J Clin Pract. 2010 Dec;64(13):1824-31 [PMID: 21070533]
  4. Am J Health Syst Pharm. 2008 Jan 1;65(1):65-8 [PMID: 18159042]
  5. J Appl Psychol. 1948 Jun;32(3):221-33 [PMID: 18867058]
  6. J Glaucoma. 2003 Feb;12(1):50-3 [PMID: 12567112]
  7. Ann Pharmacother. 2007 May;41(5):783-801 [PMID: 17426075]

Word Cloud

Created with Highcharts 10.0.0readabilitytextsinformationSlovenelevelvaluesmedicinesmaterialSloveniagradepromotionalmaterialsimportantfactorunderstandingdescribinghealthmedicationsmaypopulationphysiciansstudyFleschformulaalgorithmdifferentlowgeneralpublicOBJECTIVE:ReadabilityclaimedsymptomsindirectlyaffectsDespiteexpertisesourcesacquiringessentialtreatmentaimmeasurepromotionMETHODS:modifiedcomplybasisdeterminingeaserelatedestablishedorderestimateadjustmentrecommendedtargetedEnglishsetOnesamplet-teststandarddeviationsarithmeticmeanusedstatisticaltestsRESULTS:resultsresearchshowedscoresDifficultseentypesexaminedtexts:patientleafletssummariesproductcharacteristicsover-the-countercreatingdiseaseawarenessEspeciallyfoundwithinbelongingintendedNoneresearcheditemsevencloseprimaryschoollevelsthereforedescribedeasilyreadableCONCLUSION:providesselectedconcludedhealth-relatedcomplianthealthcareprofessionalneedsAnalyzingEasedrug

Similar Articles

Cited By