Relationship Stability through Lenses of Complexity.

Gunnur Karakurt
Author Information
  1. Gunnur Karakurt: Case Western Reserve University Department of Family Medicine, 11000 Cedar Avenue, Cleveland, OH. 44106-7136.

Abstract

Research on relationship stability usually considers the effect of couple outcomes and individual differences on relationship stability in isolation from each other. These separate bodies of research often lead to inconsistent results. In order to better understand relationship stability and explain inconsistencies in the literature, it is important to investigate more complex models that integrate couple outcomes and behaviors with individual differences. Motivated by these considerations, we examined the complex interplay between personal characteristics, couple interactions, and relationship stability. In particular, we investigated the relationships among investment model, big five personality traits, attachment dimensions, relationship factors and relationship stability. Participants of this study included 162 individuals (Female N=117) who are currently in a relationship from a large Midwestern university campus. Analyses were conducted using Structural Equation Modeling. Examination of the structural path parameters indicated that attachment had significant direct effect on personality, relationship factors, and relationship stability. Personality also had a significant direct effect on relationship stability. Finally personality had no direct effect on relationship factors and relationship factors had no direct effect on relationship stability. These results suggest that the effect of personality on relationship stability is direct, rather than being mediated by relationship factors.

References

  1. J Pers Soc Psychol. 1992 Aug;63(2):221-33 [PMID: 1403613]
  2. J Pers Soc Psychol. 1999 Nov;77(5):942-66 [PMID: 10573874]
  3. J Pers. 2002 Dec;70(6):783-812 [PMID: 12498356]
  4. J Adolesc. 2001 Jun;24(3):401-15 [PMID: 11476614]
  5. J Pers Soc Psychol. 1987 Jan;52(1):27-40 [PMID: 3820076]
  6. J Pers Soc Psychol. 2001 Dec;81(6):1042-57 [PMID: 11761306]
  7. J Pers Soc Psychol. 1996 Dec;71(6):1155-80 [PMID: 8979384]
  8. J Pers Soc Psychol. 1994 Mar;66(3):502-12 [PMID: 8169762]
  9. J Pers. 2002 Dec;70(6):925-64 [PMID: 12498360]
  10. Psychol Bull. 1995 Jul;118(1):3-34 [PMID: 7644604]
  11. J Pers Soc Psychol. 1999 Jan;76(1):46-53 [PMID: 9972552]

Grants

  1. KL2 TR000440/NCATS NIH HHS

Word Cloud

Created with Highcharts 10.0.0relationshipstabilityeffectfactorsdirectpersonalitycoupleoutcomesindividualdifferencesresultscomplexattachmentsignificantResearchusuallyconsidersisolationseparatebodiesresearchoftenleadinconsistentorderbetterunderstandexplaininconsistenciesliteratureimportantinvestigatemodelsintegratebehaviorsMotivatedconsiderationsexaminedinterplaypersonalcharacteristicsinteractionsparticularinvestigatedrelationshipsamonginvestmentmodelbigfivetraitsdimensionsParticipantsstudyincluded162individualsFemaleN=117currentlylargeMidwesternuniversitycampusAnalysesconductedusingStructuralEquationModelingExaminationstructuralpathparametersindicatedPersonalityalsoFinallysuggestrathermediatedRelationshipStabilityLensesComplexity

Similar Articles

Cited By