Asymmetry in the discrimination of length during spatial learning.

Yutaka Kosaki, Peter M Jones, John M Pearce
Author Information
  1. Yutaka Kosaki: School of Psychology, Cardiff University.

Abstract

The ability of rats to solve a discrimination between two objects that differ in length was investigated in five experiments. Using a rectangular swimming pool, Experiment 1 revealed it is easier to locate a submerged platform when it is near the center of a long rather than a short wall. For Experiments 2-4, the objects were black or white panels pasted onto the gray walls of a square pool, with two long panels pasted to two opposing walls and two short panels pasted to the remaining walls. The platform was easier to locate when it was placed near the middle of a long rather than a short panel. This effect was found when the long panels were twice (Experiments 2-4) or four times the length of the short panels (Experiment 4). Experiment 5 demonstrated that rats can solve a discrimination between panels of length 15 and 45 cm more readily than when they are 70 and 100 cm. The results are consistent with the claim that generalization gradients based on stimulus magnitude are steeper for stimuli that are weaker rather than stronger than the stimulus used for the original training.

References

  1. Cognition. 1986 Jul;23(2):149-78 [PMID: 3742991]
  2. J Exp Psychol. 1950 Dec;40(6):702-8 [PMID: 14803644]
  3. Psychol Rev. 1994 Oct;101(4):587-607 [PMID: 7984708]
  4. J Exp Psychol. 1953 Oct;46(4):225-31 [PMID: 13109118]
  5. Anim Behav. 2012 Jul 1;84(1):231-238 [PMID: 22822244]
  6. Nat Rev Neurosci. 2002 Jul;3(7):542-52 [PMID: 12094210]
  7. Acta Neurobiol Exp (Wars). 1977;37(3):191-205 [PMID: 899891]
  8. J Exp Psychol. 1959 Nov;58:321-34 [PMID: 13851902]
  9. Anim Learn Behav. 2002 Aug;30(3):177-200 [PMID: 12391785]
  10. Psychol Rev. 1952 Jan;59(1):89-93 [PMID: 14912194]
  11. Behav Processes. 2010 May;84(1):412-20 [PMID: 20067824]
  12. Psychol Rev. 1954 Jan;61(1):77-80 [PMID: 13134419]
  13. J Exp Psychol Anim Behav Process. 2011 Jan;37(1):79-93 [PMID: 21261415]
  14. Learn Behav. 2011 Dec;39(4):371-82 [PMID: 21509462]
  15. Psychol Rev. 1948 Jul;55(4):189-208 [PMID: 18870876]
  16. J Exp Psychol Anim Behav Process. 2004 Apr;30(2):135-47 [PMID: 15078123]
  17. Behav Processes. 2006 Feb 28;71(2-3):307-17 [PMID: 16412585]
  18. J Exp Psychol Anim Behav Process. 1976 Jan;2(1):88-96 [PMID: 1249526]
  19. J Exp Psychol Anim Behav Process. 2008 Jan;34(1):1-14 [PMID: 18248111]
  20. Behav Brain Res. 2008 Feb 11;187(1):159-71 [PMID: 17950928]
  21. Cognition. 2012 Apr;123(1):144-61 [PMID: 22257573]
  22. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2008 Apr 15;105(15):5909-14 [PMID: 18413609]
  23. J Exp Biol. 1997 Feb;200(Pt 4):837-47 [PMID: 9076967]

Grants

  1. BB/H006176/1/Biotechnology and Biological Sciences Research Council

MeSH Term

Animals
Discrimination, Psychological
Generalization, Psychological
Male
Maze Learning
Rats
Reaction Time
Space Perception

Word Cloud

Created with Highcharts 10.0.0panelstwolengthlongshortdiscriminationExperimentratherpastedwallsratssolveobjectspooleasierlocateplatformnearExperiments2-4cmstimulusabilitydifferinvestigatedfiveexperimentsUsingrectangularswimming1revealedsubmergedcenterwallblackwhiteontograysquareopposingremainingplacedmiddlepaneleffectfoundtwicefourtimes45demonstratedcan1545readily70100resultsconsistentclaimgeneralizationgradientsbasedmagnitudesteeperstimuliweakerstrongerusedoriginaltrainingAsymmetryspatiallearning

Similar Articles

Cited By