Similar Neural Correlates for Language and Sequential Learning: Evidence from Event-Related Brain Potentials.

Morten H Christiansen, Christopher M Conway, Luca Onnis
Author Information
  1. Morten H Christiansen: Cornell University.

Abstract

We used event-related potentials (ERPs) to investigate the time course and distribution of brain activity while adults performed (a) a sequential learning task involving complex structured sequences, and (b) a language processing task. The same positive ERP deflection, the P600 effect, typically linked to difficult or ungrammatical syntactic processing, was found for structural incongruencies in both sequential learning as well as natural language, and with similar topographical distributions. Additionally, a left anterior negativity (LAN) was observed for language but not for sequential learning. These results are interpreted as an indication that the P600 provides an index of violations and the cost of integration of expectations for upcoming material when processing complex sequential structure. We conclude that the same neural mechanisms may be recruited for both syntactic processing of linguistic stimuli and sequential learning of structured sequence patterns more generally.

Keywords

References

  1. J Acoust Soc Am. 1977 May;61(5):1337-51 [PMID: 881487]
  2. Brain Lang. 2003 Dec;87(3):345-54 [PMID: 14642537]
  3. Behav Brain Sci. 2008 Oct;31(5):489-508; discussion 509-58 [PMID: 18826669]
  4. J Cogn Neurosci. 2004 May;16(4):553-76 [PMID: 15165348]
  5. J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn. 1994 Jan;20(1):79-91 [PMID: 8138790]
  6. Mem Cognit. 2003 Jul;31(5):673-89 [PMID: 12956233]
  7. Neuropsychologia. 2005;43(1):128-41 [PMID: 15488912]
  8. Psychophysiology. 2007 Jul;44(4):491-505 [PMID: 17521377]
  9. J Cogn Neurosci. 1991 Spring;3(2):151-65 [PMID: 23972090]
  10. Mem Cognit. 2002 Sep;30(6):958-68 [PMID: 12450098]
  11. J Cogn Neurosci. 1998 Nov;10(6):717-33 [PMID: 9831740]
  12. Trends Cogn Sci. 2007 Mar;11(3):105-10 [PMID: 17254833]
  13. Brain Res Rev. 2008 Nov;59(1):55-73 [PMID: 18617270]
  14. J Cogn Neurosci. 1997 May;9(3):318-29 [PMID: 23965010]
  15. Psychol Rev. 1994 Oct;101(4):676-703 [PMID: 7984711]
  16. J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn. 1996 Sep;22(5):1219-48 [PMID: 8805821]
  17. Trends Cogn Sci. 2006 May;10(5):233-8 [PMID: 16616590]
  18. Science. 2002 Oct 18;298(5593):604-7 [PMID: 12202684]
  19. J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn. 2000 Jul;26(4):847-62 [PMID: 10946367]
  20. Cognition. 2003 Mar;87(2):B69-77 [PMID: 12590043]
  21. Top Cogn Sci. 2010 Jan;2(1):138-53 [PMID: 25163627]
  22. Neuroimage. 2009 Aug 15;47(2):735-44 [PMID: 19427908]
  23. Psychophysiology. 1997 Jan;34(1):74-86 [PMID: 9009811]
  24. J Cogn Neurosci. 1993 Spring;5(2):196-214 [PMID: 23972154]
  25. J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn. 1994 Nov;20(6):1504-10 [PMID: 7983474]
  26. Psychol Bull. 2007 Mar;133(2):227-44 [PMID: 17338598]
  27. Brain Res Cogn Brain Res. 1993 Oct;1(3):183-92 [PMID: 8257874]
  28. J Cogn Neurosci. 2008 May;20(5):892-905 [PMID: 18201121]
  29. Trends Cogn Sci. 2007 Jul;11(7):280-9 [PMID: 17548232]
  30. Brain Lang. 2007 Mar;100(3):223-37 [PMID: 16546247]
  31. J Psycholinguist Res. 2001 May;30(3):251-66 [PMID: 11523274]
  32. Trends Cogn Sci. 2008 Jul;12(7):265-72 [PMID: 18567531]
  33. Brain Res Cogn Brain Res. 2005 Mar;22(3):407-28 [PMID: 15722211]
  34. Cognition. 2005 Sep;97(2):B25-34 [PMID: 16226557]
  35. J Cogn Neurosci. 2005 Aug;17(8):1229-44 [PMID: 16197680]
  36. Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol. 1993 Sep;87(3):154-63 [PMID: 7691542]
  37. Neuroreport. 2000 Apr 7;11(5):1129-32 [PMID: 10790894]
  38. Brain Res. 2007 May 18;1146:23-49 [PMID: 17400197]
  39. J Exp Psychol Gen. 2001 Dec;130(4):658-80 [PMID: 11757874]
  40. Brain Res. 2006 Feb 3;1071(1):186-96 [PMID: 16412999]
  41. J Cogn Neurosci. 2007 Jun;19(6):1050-65 [PMID: 17536974]
  42. Brain Res Cogn Brain Res. 2003 Jan;15(2):116-26 [PMID: 12429364]
  43. J Cogn Neurosci. 2011 Feb;23(2):277-93 [PMID: 20044894]
  44. Psychol Sci. 2006 Oct;17(10):905-12 [PMID: 17100792]
  45. J Cogn Neurosci. 2005 Jan;17(1):137-53 [PMID: 15701245]
  46. Psychon Bull Rev. 1996 Dec;3(4):504-9 [PMID: 24213985]
  47. Cognition. 2008 Dec;109(3):423-30 [PMID: 19019350]
  48. Cognition. 1999 Feb 1;70(1):27-52 [PMID: 10193055]
  49. Science. 1980 Jan 11;207(4427):203-5 [PMID: 7350657]
  50. Neurosci Lett. 2005 Aug 26;384(3):228-33 [PMID: 15893877]
  51. J Exp Psychol Gen. 1991 Sep;120(3):235-53 [PMID: 1836490]
  52. Trends Cogn Sci. 1998 Aug 1;2(8):275-81 [PMID: 21227209]
  53. Trends Cogn Sci. 2004 Jan;8(1):33-9 [PMID: 14697401]
  54. J Speech Hear Res. 1995 Dec;38(6):1363-76 [PMID: 8747828]
  55. Cogn Psychol. 1987 Oct;19(4):498-550 [PMID: 3677585]
  56. J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn. 2005 Jan;31(1):24-39 [PMID: 15641902]
  57. Cogn Psychol. 2004 Mar;48(2):127-62 [PMID: 14732409]
  58. Neuroimage. 2003 Nov;20 Suppl 1:S18-29 [PMID: 14597293]
  59. Neuroreport. 2005 May 12;16(7):705-8 [PMID: 15858410]
  60. Nat Neurosci. 2006 Sep;9(9):1186-92 [PMID: 16936721]
  61. Cognition. 2010 Mar;114(3):356-71 [PMID: 19922909]
  62. Neuroreport. 2007 Jan 22;18(2):191-5 [PMID: 17301688]
  63. J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn. 2002 May;28(3):458-67 [PMID: 12018498]
  64. J Cogn Neurosci. 2008 Apr;20(4):629-42 [PMID: 18052785]
  65. Brain Res Cogn Brain Res. 2003 Jun;17(1):117-29 [PMID: 12763198]
  66. Brain Lang. 2005 Feb;92(2):117-37 [PMID: 15629487]
  67. Brain Lang. 2010 Mar;112(3):189-201 [PMID: 19450874]
  68. J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn. 2000 Nov;26(6):1355-67 [PMID: 11185769]
  69. Neurosci Lett. 2001 Dec;316(2):71-4 [PMID: 11742718]
  70. Brain Res. 2007 May 18;1146:128-45 [PMID: 17433892]
  71. Clin Neurophysiol. 2001 Mar;112(3):536-44 [PMID: 11222977]
  72. Brain Res. 2010 Jan 22;1311:121-35 [PMID: 19900421]
  73. Trends Cogn Sci. 2001 Dec 1;5(12):539-546 [PMID: 11728912]
  74. Neuropsychologia. 1971 Mar;9(1):97-113 [PMID: 5146491]
  75. Brain Lang. 2006 Jul;98(1):74-88 [PMID: 16620944]
  76. Brain Res Cogn Brain Res. 2004 May;19(3):275-88 [PMID: 15062865]
  77. Science. 1996 Dec 13;274(5294):1926-8 [PMID: 8943209]
  78. Psychophysiology. 1997 Nov;34(6):660-76 [PMID: 9401421]
  79. Acta Psychol (Amst). 2000 Mar;104(1):45-67 [PMID: 10769939]
  80. Science. 1999 Jan 1;283(5398):77-80 [PMID: 9872745]
  81. Neuroreport. 2000 Sep 28;11(14):3187-91 [PMID: 11043546]
  82. J Exp Psychol Gen. 2005 Nov;134(4):552-64 [PMID: 16316291]
  83. Mem Cognit. 2000 Jul;28(5):821-31 [PMID: 10983456]
  84. J Cogn Neurosci. 1995 Summer;7(3):376-95 [PMID: 23961867]
  85. J Commun Disord. 2002 Sep-Oct;35(5):453-62 [PMID: 12194564]
  86. Brain Res Cogn Brain Res. 2003 Oct;17(3):621-35 [PMID: 14561450]
  87. Psychol Sci. 2002 Sep;13(5):431-6 [PMID: 12219809]
  88. J Deaf Stud Deaf Educ. 2007 Summer;12(3):317-34 [PMID: 17548805]
  89. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2002 Jan 8;99(1):529-34 [PMID: 11773629]
  90. J Cogn Neurosci. 2006 Nov;18(11):1829-42 [PMID: 17069474]
  91. Cognition. 2010 Sep;116(3):382-93 [PMID: 20605017]
  92. Brain Res. 2007 Aug 20;1164:81-94 [PMID: 17658491]
  93. J Exp Psychol Gen. 2001 Sep;130(3):401-26 [PMID: 11561917]
  94. Trends Cogn Sci. 1998 Oct 1;2(10):406-16 [PMID: 21227256]
  95. J Cogn Neurosci. 1996 Summer;8(3):231-56 [PMID: 23968150]
  96. Neuroreport. 2003 Mar 3;14(3):495-9 [PMID: 12634511]
  97. Cognition. 2001 Sep;81(2):149-69 [PMID: 11376640]
  98. J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn. 1994 Jul;20(4):786-803 [PMID: 8064247]
  99. Trends Cogn Sci. 2000 May;4(5):178-186 [PMID: 10782103]
  100. Trends Cogn Sci. 1999 Aug;3(8):288-289 [PMID: 10431180]
  101. J Neurosci Methods. 2004 Mar 15;134(1):9-21 [PMID: 15102499]
  102. Brain Lang. 1995 Sep;50(3):259-81 [PMID: 7583190]
  103. J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn. 1996 Jul;22(4):970-87 [PMID: 8708606]

Grants

  1. R03 DC009485/NIDCD NIH HHS
  2. R03 HD051671/NICHD NIH HHS
  3. R03 HD051671-02/NICHD NIH HHS

Word Cloud

Created with Highcharts 10.0.0sequentiallearningprocessinglanguageP600taskcomplexstructuredERPsyntacticLANLanguageSequentialEvent-RelatedPotentialsLearningusedevent-relatedpotentialsERPsinvestigatetimecoursedistributionbrainactivityadultsperformedinvolvingsequencesbpositivedeflectioneffecttypicallylinkeddifficultungrammaticalfoundstructuralincongruencieswellnaturalsimilartopographicaldistributionsAdditionallyleftanteriornegativityobservedresultsinterpretedindicationprovidesindexviolationscostintegrationexpectationsupcomingmaterialstructureconcludeneuralmechanismsmayrecruitedlinguisticstimulisequencepatternsgenerallySimilarNeuralCorrelatesLearning:EvidenceBrainImplicitProcessingPrediction

Similar Articles

Cited By