The Impact of Policies Influencing the Demography of Age-Structured Populations: Lessons from Academies of Sciences.

Fernando Riosmena, Maria Winkler-Dworak, Alexia Prskawetz, Gustav Feichtinger
Author Information
  1. Fernando Riosmena: Population Program, Institute of Behavioral Science and Department of Geography, University of Colorado at Boulder. 1440 15 St. 483 UCB. Boulder, CO. 80302. USA.

Abstract

In this paper, we assess the role of policies aimed at regulating the number and age structure of elections on the size and age structure of five European Academies of Sciences. We show the recent pace of ageing and the degree of variation in policies across them and discuss the implications of different policies on the size and age structure of academies. We also illustrate the potential effect of different election regimes (fixed vs. linked) and age structures of election (younger vs. older) by contrasting the steady-state dynamics of different projections of Full Members in each academy into 2070 and measuring the size and age-compositional effect of changing a given policy relative to a policy scenario. Our findings suggest that academies with linked intake (i.e., where the size of the academy below a certain age is fixed and the number of elections is set to the number of members becoming that age) may be a more efficient approach to curb growth without suffering any ageing trade-offs relative to the faster growth of academies electing a fixed number of members per year. We further discuss the implications of our results in the context of stable populations open to migration.

References

  1. Demography. 1997 Aug;34(3):421-7 [PMID: 9275250]
  2. Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci. 2002 Apr 29;357(1420):583-98 [PMID: 12028794]
  3. Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci. 2009 Oct 27;364(1532):2985-90 [PMID: 19770150]
  4. Demography. 2008 Aug;45(3):641-50 [PMID: 18939665]
  5. Demography. 1992 Nov;29(4):595-612 [PMID: 1483544]
  6. Demography. 1967 Jun;4(2):680-7 [PMID: 21318679]
  7. Demography. 1971 Feb;8(1):71-80 [PMID: 5163984]
  8. Demography. 1989 Nov;26(4):691-704 [PMID: 2583325]
  9. Popul Stud (Camb). 2011 Nov;65(3):319-34 [PMID: 21919630]
  10. Am Psychol. 2010 Oct;65(7):660-73 [PMID: 20873883]
  11. Eur J Popul. 1996 Mar;12(1):41-61 [PMID: 12320422]
  12. Vienna Yearb Popul Res. 2007;2007:107-131 [PMID: 21922021]
  13. Demography. 1982 Feb;19(1):125-33 [PMID: 7067866]

Grants

  1. P2C HD066613/NICHD NIH HHS
  2. R24 HD066613/NICHD NIH HHS

Word Cloud

Created with Highcharts 10.0.0agenumbersizepoliciesstructuredifferentacademiesfixedelectionsAcademiesSciencesageingdiscussimplicationseffectelectionvslinkedacademypolicyrelativemembersgrowthpaperassessroleaimedregulatingfiveEuropeanshowrecentpacedegreevariationacrossalsoillustratepotentialregimesstructuresyoungeroldercontrastingsteady-statedynamicsprojectionsFullMembers2070measuringage-compositionalchanginggivenscenariofindingssuggestintakeiecertainsetbecomingmayefficientapproachcurbwithoutsufferingtrade-offsfasterelectingperyearresultscontextstablepopulationsopenmigrationImpactPoliciesInfluencingDemographyAge-StructuredPopulations:Lessons

Similar Articles

Cited By