Irreproducible and uninterpretable Polymyxin B MICs for Enterobacter cloacae and Enterobacter aerogenes.

David Landman, Julius Salamera, John Quale
Author Information
  1. David Landman: Division of Infectious Diseases, SUNY Downstate Medical Center, Brooklyn, New York, USA.

Abstract

Carbapenem-resistant Enterobacter species are emerging nosocomial pathogens. As with most multidrug-resistant Gram-negative pathogens, the polymyxins are often the only therapeutic option. In this study involving clinical isolates of E. cloacae and E. aerogenes, susceptibility testing methods with polymyxin B were analyzed. All isolates underwent testing by the broth microdilution (in duplicate) and agar dilution (in duplicate) methods, and select isolates were examined by the Etest method. Selected isolates were also examined for heteroresistance by population analysis profiling. Using a susceptibility breakpoint of ≤2 μg/ml, categorical agreement by all four dilution tests (two broth microdilution and two agar dilution) was achieved in only 76/114 (67%) of E. cloacae isolates (65 susceptible, 11 resistant). Thirty-eight (33%) had either conflicting or uninterpretable results (multiple skip wells, i.e., wells that exhibit no growth although growth does occur at higher concentrations). Of the 11 consistently resistant isolates, five had susceptible MICs as determined by Etest. Heteroresistant subpopulations were detected in eight of eight isolates tested, with greater percentages in isolates with uninterpretable MICs. For E. aerogenes, categorical agreement between the four dilution tests was obtained in 48/56 (86%), with conflicting and/or uninterpretable results in 8/56 (14%). For polymyxin susceptibility testing of Enterobacter species, close attention must be paid to the presence of multiple skip wells, leading to uninterpretable results. Susceptibility also should not be assumed based on the results of a single test. Until the clinical relevance of skip wells is defined, interpretation of polymyxin susceptibility tests for Enterobacter species should be undertaken with extreme caution.

References

  1. Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 2011 Mar;55(3):1274-8 [PMID: 21189345]
  2. Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 2011 Aug;55(8):3743-51 [PMID: 21646482]
  3. Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 2008 Apr;52(4):1413-8 [PMID: 18227191]
  4. J Antimicrob Chemother. 2007 Jul;60(1):78-82 [PMID: 17490999]
  5. Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 1987 Feb;31(2):230-7 [PMID: 3032093]
  6. Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 2010 Dec;54(12):4971-7 [PMID: 20855724]
  7. Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 2010 Aug;54(8):3372-82 [PMID: 20547815]
  8. Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 2011 Dec;55(12):5761-9 [PMID: 21968359]
  9. Trends Microbiol. 2008 Jun;16(6):284-90 [PMID: 18467098]
  10. Mol Microbiol. 1995 Apr;16(2):271-8 [PMID: 7565089]
  11. J Clin Microbiol. 2001 Jan;39(1):183-90 [PMID: 11136768]
  12. Epidemiol Infect. 2009 Feb;137(2):174-80 [PMID: 18503729]
  13. J Bacteriol. 2004 Jan;186(2):575-9 [PMID: 14702327]
  14. Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 2007 Jan;51(1):376-8 [PMID: 17043112]
  15. Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 2009 Oct;53(10):4345-51 [PMID: 19635950]
  16. Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 2009 Sep;53(9):3628-34 [PMID: 19528270]
  17. J Clin Microbiol. 2013 Jun;51(6):1678-84 [PMID: 23486719]
  18. Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 2013 May;57(5):2204-15 [PMID: 23459479]
  19. Ann N Y Acad Sci. 1949 Jun 22;51(Art. 5):944-51 [PMID: 18135901]
  20. Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 2011 Jun;55(6):3022-4 [PMID: 21402838]
  21. Mol Microbiol. 1999 Oct;34(2):305-16 [PMID: 10564474]
  22. Crit Care Med. 2001 Apr;29(4 Suppl):N64-8 [PMID: 11292878]
  23. Clin Microbiol Infect. 2007 May;13(5):541-4 [PMID: 17371537]
  24. Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 2006 Sep;50(9):2946-50 [PMID: 16940086]
  25. Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 2009 Dec;53(12):5150-4 [PMID: 19752280]
  26. Chemotherapy. 1982;28(5):363-8 [PMID: 6291867]
  27. Mol Microbiol. 2003 Oct;50(1):205-17 [PMID: 14507375]
  28. Eur J Biochem. 1996 Apr 1;237(1):272-8 [PMID: 8620884]
  29. Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 2012 Dec;56(12):6212-22 [PMID: 23006746]
  30. Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 2007 Oct;51(10):3726-30 [PMID: 17646414]

MeSH Term

Anti-Bacterial Agents
Enterobacter aerogenes
Enterobacter cloacae
Humans
Microbial Sensitivity Tests
Polymyxin B
Reproducibility of Results

Chemicals

Anti-Bacterial Agents
Polymyxin B

Word Cloud

Created with Highcharts 10.0.0isolatesEnterobacteruninterpretableEsusceptibilitydilutionresultswellsspeciescloacaeaerogenestestingpolymyxintestsskipMICspathogensclinicalmethodsBbrothmicrodilutionduplicateagarexaminedEtestalsocategoricalagreementfourtwosusceptible11resistantconflictingmultiplegrowtheightCarbapenem-resistantemergingnosocomialmultidrug-resistantGram-negativepolymyxinsoftentherapeuticoptionstudyinvolvinganalyzedunderwentselectmethodSelectedheteroresistancepopulationanalysisprofilingUsingbreakpoint≤2μg/mlachieved76/11467%65Thirty-eight33%eitherieexhibitalthoughoccurhigherconcentrationsconsistentlyfivedeterminedHeteroresistantsubpopulationsdetectedtestedgreaterpercentagesobtained48/5686%and/or8/5614%closeattentionmustpaidpresenceleadingSusceptibilityassumedbasedsingletestrelevancedefinedinterpretationundertakenextremecautionIrreproduciblePolymyxin

Similar Articles

Cited By (35)