Translational Molecular Imaging of Prostate Cancer.

Ana P Kiess, Steve Y Cho, Martin G Pomper
Author Information
  1. Ana P Kiess: Department of Radiation Oncology, Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY.

Abstract

Prostate cancer is a heterogeneous disease, and its management is now evolving to become more personalized and to incorporate new targeted therapies. With these new changes comes a demand for molecular imaging techniques that can not only detect disease but also assess biology and treatment response. This review article summarizes current molecular imaging approaches in prostate cancer (e.g. Tc bone scintigraphy and F-fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography) and highlights emerging clinical and preclinical imaging agents, with an emphasis on mechanism and clinical application. Emerging agents at various stages of clinical translation include radiolabeled analogs of lipid, amino acid, and nucleoside metabolism, as well as agents more specifically targeting prostate cancer biomarkers including androgen receptor, prostate-specific membrane antigen and others. We also highlight new techniques and targeted contrast agents for magnetic resonance imaging and spectroscopy. For all these imaging techniques, a growing and important unmet need is for well-designed prospective clinical trials to establish clear indications with clinical benefit in prostate cancer.

Keywords

References

  1. Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging. 2012 Jan;39(1):13-26 [PMID: 21932120]
  2. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2012 Nov;199(5):1114-20 [PMID: 23096187]
  3. Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging. 2011 Jan;38(1):55-63 [PMID: 20848281]
  4. Magn Reson Med. 2007 Dec;58(6):1099-106 [PMID: 17969006]
  5. Am J Nucl Med Mol Imaging. 2013;3(1):85-96 [PMID: 23342303]
  6. Sci Transl Med. 2012 Mar 28;4(127):127rv3 [PMID: 22461644]
  7. N Engl J Med. 2013 Jan 10;368(2):138-48 [PMID: 23228172]
  8. Clin Cancer Res. 2005 Jul 1;11(13):4761-9 [PMID: 16000572]
  9. Radiographics. 2011 May-Jun;31(3):677-703 [PMID: 21571651]
  10. Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging. 2005 Jan;32(1):15-22 [PMID: 15586282]
  11. Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging. 2010 Apr;37(4):706-13 [PMID: 20016889]
  12. J Urol. 2004 Jul;172(1):133-6 [PMID: 15201753]
  13. J Urol. 1989 Jul;142(1):76-82 [PMID: 2659828]
  14. Urol Int. 2003;70(4):311-5 [PMID: 12740497]
  15. J Urol. 2003 Nov;170(5):1717-21 [PMID: 14532761]
  16. Nat Nanotechnol. 2012 Oct;7(10):677-82 [PMID: 22983492]
  17. Prostate Cancer Prostatic Dis. 2012 Mar;15(1):45-55 [PMID: 21844889]
  18. J Med Chem. 2008 Aug 14;51(15):4504-17 [PMID: 18637669]
  19. Lancet. 2010 Apr 24;375(9724):1437-46 [PMID: 20398925]
  20. J Nucl Med. 2007 Jan;48(1):56-63 [PMID: 17204699]
  21. J Nucl Med. 2010 Aug;51(8):1293-300 [PMID: 20660376]
  22. J Nucl Med. 2011 Jul;52(7):1005-8 [PMID: 21680688]
  23. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2011 Jun 7;108(23):9578-82 [PMID: 21606347]
  24. Nuklearmedizin. 2003 Feb;42(1):25-30 [PMID: 12601451]
  25. Mol Imaging. 2012 Sep-Oct;11(5):426-32 [PMID: 22954187]
  26. Nucl Med Biol. 2004 Oct;31(7):851-8 [PMID: 15464386]
  27. J Clin Oncol. 2010 Jan 1;28(1):126-31 [PMID: 19917860]
  28. Clin Cancer Res. 2011 Jun 1;17(11):3751-9 [PMID: 21493868]
  29. N Engl J Med. 2003 Jun 19;348(25):2491-9 [PMID: 12815134]
  30. Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging. 2011 Jan;38(1):81-9 [PMID: 20878403]
  31. Amino Acids. 2013 Feb;44(2):543-53 [PMID: 22833158]
  32. Hum Pathol. 2007 May;38(5):696-701 [PMID: 17320151]
  33. J Nucl Med. 2009 Apr;50(4):606-11 [PMID: 19289418]
  34. J Nucl Med. 2008 Feb;49(2):327-34 [PMID: 18199615]
  35. Radiology. 2007 Apr;243(1):28-53 [PMID: 17392247]
  36. Eur Radiol. 2011 Sep;21(9):1970-8 [PMID: 21533634]
  37. Ann Nucl Med. 2012 Feb;26(2):138-45 [PMID: 22069194]
  38. J Nucl Med. 2008 Jan;49(1):112-21 [PMID: 18077536]
  39. Cancer Discov. 2012 Apr;2(4):320-7 [PMID: 22576209]
  40. Eur Urol. 2011 Jun;59(6):962-77 [PMID: 21367519]
  41. J Nucl Med. 2012 Dec;53(12):1883-91 [PMID: 23203246]
  42. Clin Cancer Res. 2011 Dec 15;17(24):7673-83 [PMID: 22038995]
  43. Bioconjug Chem. 2012 Dec 19;23(12):2377-85 [PMID: 23157641]
  44. Clin Cancer Res. 1996 Aug;2(8):1289-97 [PMID: 9816299]
  45. Clin Cancer Res. 2010 Dec 15;16(24):6093-9 [PMID: 20975102]
  46. J Nucl Med. 1990 Mar;31(3):332-6 [PMID: 2308004]
  47. Lancet Oncol. 2008 Sep;9(9):850-6 [PMID: 18708295]
  48. J Clin Oncol. 2005 Jul 20;23(21):4591-601 [PMID: 15837970]
  49. N Engl J Med. 2011 May 26;364(21):1995-2005 [PMID: 21612468]
  50. NMR Biomed. 2012 Jan;25(1):113-122 [PMID: 21618306]
  51. N Engl J Med. 2004 Oct 7;351(15):1513-20 [PMID: 15470214]
  52. Eur J Radiol. 2007 Sep;63(3):351-60 [PMID: 17709223]
  53. Eur Urol. 2012 Jul;62(1):78-84 [PMID: 22306323]
  54. Bioconjug Chem. 2012 Aug 15;23(8):1548-56 [PMID: 22812444]
  55. Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging. 2005 Mar;32(3):344-50 [PMID: 15726353]
  56. Lancet. 2010 Oct 2;376(9747):1147-54 [PMID: 20888992]
  57. J Urol. 2005 Jan;173(1):66-9; discussion 69 [PMID: 15592030]
  58. Clin Cancer Res. 2005 May 1;11(9):3210-6 [PMID: 15867215]
  59. Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging. 2012 Jun;39(6):1085-6 [PMID: 22310854]
  60. Curr Med Chem. 2012;19(9):1346-59 [PMID: 22304713]
  61. J Nucl Med. 2003 Apr;44(4):549-55 [PMID: 12679398]
  62. JAMA. 2010 Dec 1;304(21):2373-80 [PMID: 21119084]
  63. J Clin Oncol. 2004 Jul 1;22(13):2522-31 [PMID: 15173215]
  64. J Nucl Med. 2012 Sep;53(9):1427-37 [PMID: 22872743]
  65. J Clin Oncol. 2007 Feb 10;25(5):540-7 [PMID: 17290063]
  66. Eur Urol. 2011 Nov;60(5):935-43 [PMID: 21840116]
  67. J Nucl Med. 2006 Feb;47(2):287-97 [PMID: 16455635]
  68. J Nucl Med. 2004 Mar;45(3):366-73 [PMID: 15001675]
  69. Clin Nucl Med. 2012 Apr;37(4):325-31 [PMID: 22391699]
  70. Clin Nucl Med. 2011 Sep;36(9):800-2 [PMID: 21825855]
  71. Curr Top Med Chem. 2013;13(8):951-62 [PMID: 23590171]
  72. Clin Cancer Res. 2011 Dec 15;17(24):7645-53 [PMID: 22042970]
  73. Curr Opin Urol. 2012 Jul;22(4):320-7 [PMID: 22617062]
  74. J Nucl Med. 2011 Oct;52(10):1608-15 [PMID: 21908391]
  75. N Engl J Med. 2010 Jul 29;363(5):411-22 [PMID: 20818862]
  76. J Med Chem. 2006 Apr 6;49(7):2155-65 [PMID: 16570911]
  77. N Engl J Med. 2012 Sep 27;367(13):1187-97 [PMID: 22894553]
  78. Biochim Biophys Acta. 2013 Oct;1831(10):1518-32 [PMID: 23562839]
  79. Radiother Oncol. 2011 May;99(2):193-200 [PMID: 21620494]
  80. J Nucl Med. 2009 Sep;50(9):1394-400 [PMID: 19690023]
  81. J Urol. 2007 Jun;177(6):2106-31 [PMID: 17509297]
  82. J Clin Oncol. 2003 May 1;21(9):1715-21 [PMID: 12721246]
  83. Theranostics. 2012;2(3):313-7 [PMID: 22448197]
  84. Urology. 1998 Oct;52(4):637-40 [PMID: 9763084]
  85. J Urol. 2012 Nov;188(5):1732-8 [PMID: 23017866]
  86. Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging. 2007 Feb;34(2):185-96 [PMID: 16832632]
  87. Cancer Res. 2008 Oct 15;68(20):8607-15 [PMID: 18922937]
  88. Urology. 2001 Jun;57(6):1179-83 [PMID: 11377343]
  89. J Nucl Med. 2012 Jan;53(1):90-7 [PMID: 22173843]
  90. J Clin Oncol. 2012 Feb 10;30(5):519-24 [PMID: 22231045]
  91. Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging. 2013 Apr;40(4):486-95 [PMID: 23179945]

Grants

  1. R01 CA134675/NCI NIH HHS

Word Cloud

Created with Highcharts 10.0.0imagingcancerclinicalprostateagentsnewtechniquesemissiontomographyProstatediseasetargetedmolecularalsopositronandrogenreceptorprostate-specificmembraneantigenmagneticresonanceMolecularheterogeneousmanagementnowevolvingbecomepersonalizedincorporatetherapieschangescomesdemandcandetectassessbiologytreatmentresponsereviewarticlesummarizescurrentapproachesegTcbonescintigraphyF-fluorodeoxyglucosehighlightsemergingpreclinicalemphasismechanismapplicationEmergingvariousstagestranslationincluderadiolabeledanalogslipidaminoacidnucleosidemetabolismwellspecificallytargetingbiomarkersincludingothershighlightcontrastspectroscopygrowingimportantunmetneedwell-designedprospectivetrialsestablishclearindicationsbenefitTranslationalImagingCancersinglephotoncomputed

Similar Articles

Cited By