Effects of setting under air pressure on the number of surface pores and irregularities of dental investment materials.

Anita Tourah, Alireza Moshaverinia, Winston W Chee
Author Information
  1. Anita Tourah: Clinical Assistant Professor of Dentistry, Division of Restorative Sciences, Herman Ostrow School of Dentistry, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, Calif.
  2. Alireza Moshaverinia: Postdoctoral Research Fellow, Center for Craniofacial Molecular Biology (CCMB), Herman Ostrow School of Dentistry, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, Calif. Electronic address: moshaver@usc.edu.
  3. Winston W Chee: Ralph & Jean Bleak Professor of Restorative Dentistry; Director, Implant Dentistry; and Co-Director, Advanced Prosthodontics, Herman Ostrow School of Dentistry, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, Calif.

Abstract

STATEMENT OF PROBLEM: Surface roughness and irregularities are important properties of dental investment materials that can affect the fit of a restoration. Whether setting under air pressure affects the surface irregularities of gypsum-bonded and phosphate-bonded investment materials is unknown.
PURPOSE: The purpose of this study was to investigate the effect of air pressure on the pore size and surface irregularities of investment materials immediately after pouring.
MATERIAL AND METHODS: Three dental investments, 1 gypsum-bonded investment and 2 phosphate-bonded investments, were investigated. They were vacuum mixed according to the manufacturers' recommendations, then poured into a ringless casting system. The prepared specimens were divided into 2 groups: 1 bench setting and the other placed in a pressure pot at 172 kPa. After 45 minutes of setting, the rings were removed and the investments were cut at a right angle to the long axis with a diamond disk. The surfaces of the investments were steam cleaned, dried with an air spray, and observed with a stereomicroscope. A profilometer was used to evaluate the surface roughness (μm) of the castings. The number of surface pores was counted for 8 specimens from each group and the means and standard deviations were reported. Two-way ANOVA was used to compare the data.
RESULTS: Specimens that set under atmospheric air pressure had a significantly higher number of pores than specimens that set under increased pressure (P<.05). No statistically significant differences for surface roughness were found (P=.078). Also, no significant difference was observed among the 3 different types of materials tested (P>.05).
CONCLUSION: Specimens set under positive pressure in a pressure chamber presented fewer surface bubbles than specimens set under atmospheric pressure. Positive pressure is effective and, therefore, is recommended for both gypsum-bonded and phosphate-bonded investment materials.

MeSH Term

Air Pressure
Calcium Sulfate
Dental Casting Investment
Materials Testing
Phosphates
Porosity
Pressure
Surface Properties
Time Factors

Chemicals

Dental Casting Investment
Phosphates
ceramigold
novocast
Calcium Sulfate

Word Cloud

Created with Highcharts 10.0.0pressuresurfaceinvestmentmaterialsairirregularitiessettinginvestmentsspecimenssetroughnessdentalgypsum-bondedphosphate-bondednumberpores12observedusedSpecimensatmospheric05significantSTATEMENTOFPROBLEM:SurfaceimportantpropertiescanaffectfitrestorationWhetheraffectsunknownPURPOSE:purposestudyinvestigateeffectporesizeimmediatelypouringMATERIALANDMETHODS:Threeinvestigatedvacuummixedaccordingmanufacturers'recommendationspouredringlesscastingsystemprepareddividedgroups:benchplacedpot172kPa45minutesringsremovedcutrightanglelongaxisdiamonddisksurfacessteamcleaneddriedspraystereomicroscopeprofilometerevaluateμmcastingscounted8groupmeansstandarddeviationsreportedTwo-wayANOVAcomparedataRESULTS:significantlyhigherincreasedP<statisticallydifferencesfoundP=078Alsodifferenceamong3differenttypestestedP>CONCLUSION:positivechamberpresentedfewerbubblesPositiveeffectivethereforerecommendedEffects

Similar Articles

Cited By (2)