Making birth defects 'preventable': pre-conceptional vitamin supplements and the politics of risk reduction.

Salim Al-Gailani
Author Information
  1. Salim Al-Gailani: Department of History and Philosophy of Science, University of Cambridge, Free School Lane, Cambridge CB2 3RH, UK. Electronic address: ssa32@cam.ac.uk.

Abstract

Since the mid-1990s, governments and health organizations around the world have adopted policies designed to increase women's intake of the B-vitamin 'folic acid' before and during the first weeks of pregnancy. Building on initial clinical research in the United Kingdom, folic acid supplementation has been shown to lower the incidence of neural tube defects (NTDs). Recent debate has focused principally on the need for mandatory fortification of grain products with this vitamin. This article takes a longer view, tracing the transformation of folic acid from a routine prenatal supplement to reduce the risk of anaemia to a routine 'pre-conceptional' supplement to 'prevent' birth defects. Understood in the 1950s in relation to social problems of poverty and malnutrition, NTDs were by the end of the century more likely to be attributed to individual failings. This transition was closely associated with a second. Folic acid supplements were initially prescribed to 'high-risk' women who had previously borne a child with a NTD. By the mid-1990s, they were recommended for all women of childbearing age. The acceptance of folic acid as a 'risk-reducing drug' both relied upon and helped to advance the development of preventive and clinical practices concerned with women's health before pregnancy.

Keywords

References

  1. Lancet. 1964 Nov 28;2(7370):1146-9 [PMID: 14213572]
  2. Br Med J. 1971 Dec 18;4(5789):734-6 [PMID: 5129620]
  3. Br Med J. 1965 Feb 20;1(5433):480-5 [PMID: 14238675]
  4. BMJ. 2007 Jun 16;334(7606):1252 [PMID: 17569931]
  5. Dev Med Child Neurol. 1967;:Suppl 13:35-50 [PMID: 4860652]
  6. Milbank Q. 1993;71(3):411-37 [PMID: 8413069]
  7. Br J Haematol. 2001 Jun;113(3):579-89 [PMID: 11380441]
  8. Bull World Health Organ. 1963;28(4):517-29 [PMID: 13935207]
  9. Lancet. 1982 Jan 30;1(8266):275-6 [PMID: 6120289]
  10. Clio Med. 1997;43:1-31 [PMID: 9459051]
  11. Med Hist. 2009 Jul;53(3):331-50 [PMID: 19584956]
  12. Birth Defects Res A Clin Mol Teratol. 2009 Apr;85(4):254-9 [PMID: 19067403]
  13. J Obstet Gynaecol Br Emp. 1952 Apr;59(2):183-96 [PMID: 14928086]
  14. Br Med J (Clin Res Ed). 1981 Sep 12;283(6293):685 [PMID: 6793125]
  15. Med Hist. 2008 Oct;52(4):493-510 [PMID: 18958251]
  16. J Biosoc Sci. 1974 Apr;6(2):113-37 [PMID: 4845039]
  17. Br J Nutr. 1977 Nov;38(3):497-506 [PMID: 201270]
  18. Br J Prev Soc Med. 1968 Jul;22(3):146-60 [PMID: 4874476]
  19. J Obstet Gynaecol Br Emp. 1946 Dec;53(6):498-509 [PMID: 12255545]
  20. Med Humanit. 2010 Dec;36(2):118-21 [PMID: 21393296]
  21. Br Med J. 1964 Jul 18;2(5402):138 [PMID: 14150883]
  22. Fem Stud. 1997 Summer;23(2):351-72 [PMID: 11656819]
  23. Lancet. 1980 May 17;1(8177):1061-2 [PMID: 6103394]
  24. Lancet. 1994 Jan 8;343(8889):123-4 [PMID: 7903762]
  25. J R Coll Gen Pract. 1981 Dec;31(233):707-11 [PMID: 7338863]
  26. Lancet. 1972 Jul 29;2(7770):197-9 [PMID: 4114207]
  27. Proc Soc Exp Biol Med. 1959 Jun;101(2):350-2 [PMID: 13675237]
  28. Nature. 1982 Sep 16;299(5880):198 [PMID: 7110341]
  29. N Engl J Med. 1992 Dec 24;327(26):1832-5 [PMID: 1307234]
  30. Dev Med Child Neurol. 1962 Jun;4:320-4 [PMID: 13914463]
  31. Nutr Rev. 1988 Sep;46(9):324-5 [PMID: 3067148]
  32. New Sci. 1982 Dec 16;96(1336):709 [PMID: 11655513]
  33. Hum Reprod. 2010 Sep;25(9):2157-74 [PMID: 20657027]
  34. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 1952 Jun;63(6):1298-304 [PMID: 14933487]
  35. Paediatr Perinat Epidemiol. 1996 Jan;10(1):2-16 [PMID: 8746426]
  36. Nature. 1984 Jun 21-27;309(5970):661 [PMID: 6374472]
  37. Br J Prev Soc Med. 1970 May;24(2):67-77 [PMID: 4914434]
  38. Nature. 1985 Mar 14-20;314(6007):127-8 [PMID: 3974717]
  39. Br Med J. 1964 Jul 18;2(5402):178-9 [PMID: 14150899]
  40. New Sci. 1978 Jan 12;77(1085):68 [PMID: 11663823]
  41. Reprod Biomed Online. 2011 May;22(5):457-71 [PMID: 21397558]
  42. Br J Soc Med. 1950 Jan;4(1):26-50 [PMID: 15426747]
  43. Women Health. 1989;15(4):25-59 [PMID: 2618063]
  44. J Med Ethics. 2007 Sep;33(9):501-7 [PMID: 17761816]
  45. J Med Ethics. 1985 Sep;11(3):159-60 [PMID: 2932554]
  46. Pediatrics. 2012 Aug;130(2):181-3 [PMID: 22826577]
  47. Br Med J. 1967 Feb 18;1(5537):415-6 [PMID: 6017512]
  48. Arch Dis Child. 1976 Dec;51(12):944-50 [PMID: 1015847]
  49. Lancet. 1982 Mar 27;1(8274):748 [PMID: 6122045]
  50. BMJ. 2007 Jun 16;334(7606):1253 [PMID: 17569932]
  51. Br Med J. 1968 May 18;2(5602):377-9 [PMID: 5648991]
  52. Br Med J. 1956 Jun 2;1(4978):1262-5 [PMID: 13316125]
  53. Br Med J. 1980 May 17;280(6225):1199-202 [PMID: 6155970]
  54. Times (Lond). 1974 Feb 20;:15 [PMID: 11649108]
  55. Milbank Q. 2009 Jun;87(2):417-42 [PMID: 19523124]
  56. J Med Screen. 2007;14(2):55-9 [PMID: 17626701]
  57. Clio Med. 1995;32:1-14 [PMID: 9061234]
  58. Lancet. 1982 Mar 27;1(8274):748 [PMID: 6122046]
  59. Med Soc (Berkeley). 1996;:1-466 [PMID: 11619509]
  60. Br Med J. 1968 Mar 16;1(5593):660 [PMID: 4867860]
  61. Lancet. 1991 Aug 10;338(8763):379-80 [PMID: 1677712]
  62. Arch Dis Child. 1992 Sep;67(9):1061-2 [PMID: 21032803]
  63. Econ Hist Rev. 2009 Aug;62(3):629-654 [PMID: 20098665]
  64. Br Med J. 1964 Jan 11;1(5375):71-2 [PMID: 20790050]
  65. Lancet. 1991 Jul 20;338(8760):153-4 [PMID: 1677069]
  66. Lancet. 1993 Nov 6;342(8880):1174 [PMID: 7901496]
  67. Lancet. 1951 Jan 27;1(6648):192-6 [PMID: 14795817]
  68. New Sci. 1988 Nov 12;120(1638):26-7 [PMID: 11655899]
  69. Int J Epidemiol. 2010 Apr;39 Suppl 1:i110-21 [PMID: 20348114]
  70. Lancet. 1991 Jul 20;338(8760):131-7 [PMID: 1677062]
  71. Proc R Soc Med. 1967 Nov;60(11 Part 2):1219-24 [PMID: 4229051]
  72. Soc Hist Med. 2002 Apr;15(1):109-35 [PMID: 12625329]
  73. Br Med J. 1970 Jan 3;1(5687):16-7 [PMID: 5460838]
  74. Br Med J. 1966 Dec 24;2(5529):1543-4 [PMID: 5926254]
  75. Lancet. 1980 Feb 16;1(8164):339-40 [PMID: 6101792]
  76. Lancet. 1977 Feb 26;1(8009):462 [PMID: 65568]
  77. Br Med J. 1964 Mar 14;1(5384):649 [PMID: 14096453]

Grants

  1. /Wellcome Trust
  2. 088708/Wellcome Trust

MeSH Term

Anemia
Dietary Supplements
Female
Folic Acid
History, 20th Century
Humans
Infant, Newborn
Neural Tube Defects
Politics
Pregnancy
Prenatal Care
Risk Reduction Behavior
United Kingdom
Vitamin B Complex

Chemicals

Vitamin B Complex
Folic Acid

Word Cloud

Created with Highcharts 10.0.0acidhealthfolicdefectssupplementsmid-1990swomen'spregnancyclinicalNTDsvitaminroutinesupplementriskbirthFolicwomenSincegovernmentsorganizationsaroundworldadoptedpoliciesdesignedincreaseintakeB-vitamin'folicacid'firstweeksBuildinginitialresearchUnitedKingdomsupplementationshownlowerincidenceneuraltubeRecentdebatefocusedprincipallyneedmandatoryfortificationgrainproductsarticletakeslongerviewtracingtransformationprenatalreduceanaemia'pre-conceptional''prevent'Understood1950srelationsocialproblemspovertymalnutritionendcenturylikelyattributedindividualfailingstransitioncloselyassociatedsecondinitiallyprescribed'high-risk'previouslybornechildNTDrecommendedchildbearingageacceptance'risk-reducingdrug'relieduponhelpedadvancedevelopmentpreventivepracticesconcernedMaking'preventable':pre-conceptionalpoliticsreductionClinicaltrialsPre-conceptionPublicRiskVitamin

Similar Articles

Cited By