Functional activities versus work hardening in the rehabilitation of the injured worker.

S Wilson, C Haws, P Naccarato, A P Beaulne
Author Information
  1. S Wilson: Alberta Workers' Compensation Board Rehabilitation Centre, Edmonton, Alberta, Canada.
  2. C Haws: Alberta Workers' Compensation Board Rehabilitation Centre, Edmonton, Alberta, Canada.
  3. P Naccarato: Alberta Workers' Compensation Board Rehabilitation Centre, Edmonton, Alberta, Canada.
  4. A P Beaulne: Alberta Workers' Compensation Board Rehabilitation Centre, Edmonton, Alberta, Canada.

Abstract

A correlational study was carried out to consider whether a program based on a work-hardening paradigm would result in objective improvements in return-to-work rates relative to a functional-activities approach. Subjects, 165 nurses, were obtained from the Alberta Workers' Compensation Board Rehabilitation Centre client files. The clients were described relative to their age, accident-to-admission times, length of stay, and other relevant measures. A logistic regression was carried out to ascertain whether a work-hardening program versus a functional-activities program would be more effective in facilitating return-to-work rates. The logistic regression was carried out controlling for other relevant predictor variables. The results indicated that clients who received a work-hardening program were statistically more likely to return to work.

Keywords

Word Cloud

Created with Highcharts 10.0.0programcarriedwork-hardeningregressionwhetherreturn-to-workratesrelativefunctional-activitiesclientsrelevantlogisticversusworkFunctionalactivitieshardeningrehabilitationcorrelationalstudyconsiderbasedparadigmresultobjectiveimprovementsapproachSubjects165nursesobtainedAlbertaWorkers'CompensationBoardRehabilitationCentreclientfilesdescribedageaccident-to-admissiontimeslengthstaymeasuresascertaineffectivefacilitatingcontrollingpredictorvariablesresultsindicatedreceivedstatisticallylikelyreturninjuredworkerIndustrialLogisticWork

Similar Articles

Cited By