Never Seem to Find the Time: Evaluating the Physiological Time Course of Visual Word Recognition with Regression Analysis of Single Item ERPs.

Sarah Laszlo, Kara D Federmeier
Author Information
  1. Sarah Laszlo: Department of Psychology, State University of New York, Binghamton ; Program in Linguistics, State University of New York, Binghamton.
  2. Kara D Federmeier: Department of Psychology, University of Illinois, Urbana-Champaign ; Program in Neuroscience, University of Illinois, Urbana-Champaign ; Beckman Institute for Advanced Science and Technology, University of Illinois, Urbana-Champaign.

Abstract

Visual word recognition is a process that, both hierarchically and in parallel, draws on different types of information ranging from perceptual to orthographic to semantic. A central question concerns when and how these different types of information come online and interact after a word form is initially perceived. Numerous studies addressing aspects of this question have been conducted with a variety of techniques (e.g., behavior, eye-tracking, ERPs), and divergent theoretical models, suggesting different overall speeds of word processing, have coalesced around clusters of mostly method-specific results. Here, we examine the time course of influence of variables ranging from relatively perceptual (e.g., bigram frequency) to relatively semantic (e.g., number of lexical associates) on ERP responses, analyzed at the single item level. Our results, in combination with a critical review of the literature, suggest methodological, analytic, and theoretical factors that may have led to inconsistency in results of past studies; we will argue that consideration of these factors may lead to a reconciliation between divergent views of the speed of word recognition.

Keywords

References

  1. J Mem Lang. 2009 Oct 1;61(3):326-338 [PMID: 20161064]
  2. Cogn Affect Behav Neurosci. 2008 Jun;8(2):222-8 [PMID: 18589511]
  3. J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn. 1999 May;25(3):721-42 [PMID: 10368929]
  4. Clin Neurophysiol. 2007 Oct;118(10):2128-48 [PMID: 17573239]
  5. J Cogn Neurosci. 2000 Nov;12(6):1024-37 [PMID: 11177422]
  6. J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn. 1994 Jul;20(4):804-23 [PMID: 8064248]
  7. Psychophysiology. 2008 May;45(3):458-66 [PMID: 18221447]
  8. J Exp Psychol Gen. 2004 Jun;133(2):283-316 [PMID: 15149254]
  9. Brain Res Cogn Brain Res. 2002 Nov;14(3):398-409 [PMID: 12421663]
  10. Psychol Res. 2012 Mar;76(2):145-58 [PMID: 21915693]
  11. Vis cogn. 2012 Jan 1;20(4-5):360-390 [PMID: 22707910]
  12. Psychol Rev. 1998 Jan;105(1):125-57 [PMID: 9450374]
  13. Nature. 1994 Nov 17;372(6503):260-3 [PMID: 7969469]
  14. Cognition. 2009 Mar;110(3):293-321 [PMID: 19121826]
  15. Behav Brain Sci. 1999 Apr;22(2):253-79; discussion 280-336 [PMID: 11301524]
  16. Neuroimage. 2006 May 1;30(4):1383-400 [PMID: 16460964]
  17. Brain Res Cogn Brain Res. 2003 Apr;16(2):123-44 [PMID: 12668221]
  18. J Exp Psychol Gen. 2011 Nov;140(4):552-72 [PMID: 21744985]
  19. Neuroimage. 2012 Apr 2;60(2):1462-77 [PMID: 22281671]
  20. J Cogn Neurosci. 2001 May 15;13(4):454-61 [PMID: 11388919]
  21. Psychophysiology. 1998 May;35(3):240-51 [PMID: 9564744]
  22. Discourse Process. 2006;42(2):205-238 [PMID: 17203135]
  23. Psychophysiology. 2011 Apr;48(4):523-531 [PMID: 21361965]
  24. Psychol Rev. 2006 Apr;113(2):327-57 [PMID: 16637764]
  25. Mem Cognit. 1990 Jul;18(4):367-79 [PMID: 2381316]
  26. Trends Cogn Sci. 2005 Jul;9(7):335-41 [PMID: 15951224]
  27. Clin Neurophysiol. 2004 May;115(5):1090-103 [PMID: 15066535]
  28. Lang Linguist Compass. 2009 Jan 1;3(1):128-156 [PMID: 19750025]
  29. Lang Cogn Process. 2008;23(1):183-200 [PMID: 19590754]
  30. Lang Cogn Process. 2007 Jan;22(3):337-376 [PMID: 18163153]
  31. Neuroimage. 2008 Feb 15;39(4):1959-79 [PMID: 18055223]
  32. Lang Cogn Process. 2012;27(2):257-274 [PMID: 22518068]
  33. Hum Brain Mapp. 2002 Feb;15(2):95-111 [PMID: 11835601]
  34. Neuroreport. 1999 Oct 19;10(15):3175-8 [PMID: 10574555]
  35. Brain Res. 2007 Jun 25;1155:147-62 [PMID: 17499223]
  36. Acta Psychol (Amst). 2011 Jun;137(2):190-200 [PMID: 20965479]
  37. Trends Cogn Sci. 2003 May;7(5):187-189 [PMID: 12757816]
  38. Biol Psychol. 2009 Jan;80(1):4-9 [PMID: 18565638]
  39. J Cogn Neurosci. 1996 Spring;8(2):89-106 [PMID: 23971417]
  40. Psychon Bull Rev. 2007 Aug;14(4):612-9 [PMID: 17972722]
  41. J Neurophysiol. 1997 Jan;77(1):24-42 [PMID: 9120566]
  42. Annu Rev Psychol. 2011;62:621-47 [PMID: 20809790]
  43. Psychophysiology. 2011 Feb;48(2):176-86 [PMID: 20624252]
  44. Brain Cogn. 1990 Nov;14(2):201-12 [PMID: 2285513]
  45. Nat Neurosci. 2005 Aug;8(8):1117-21 [PMID: 16007080]
  46. J Cogn Neurosci. 2006 Oct;18(10):1631-43 [PMID: 17014368]
  47. Neuroreport. 1998 Jul 13;9(10):2195-200 [PMID: 9694199]
  48. Psychophysiology. 2011 Jul;48(7):993-1003 [PMID: 21261631]
  49. Psychophysiology. 1993 Sep;30(5):518-24 [PMID: 8416078]
  50. Neuropsychologia. 2007 Oct 1;45(13):3001-14 [PMID: 17659309]
  51. Q J Exp Psychol (Hove). 2009 Aug;62(8):1457-506 [PMID: 19449261]
  52. Vision Res. 2011 Jun 21;51(12):1297-311 [PMID: 21549144]
  53. Neuroimage. 2000 Feb;11(2):98-110 [PMID: 10679183]
  54. Neuroimage. 2013 Aug 15;77:1-13 [PMID: 23567884]
  55. Neuroimage. 2012 Aug 1;62(1):381-93 [PMID: 22521255]
  56. Neuropsychologia. 2011 Apr;49(5):970-983 [PMID: 21219919]
  57. Mem Cognit. 1986 May;14(3):191-201 [PMID: 3736392]
  58. Cogn Psychol. 2006 Feb;52(1):1-56 [PMID: 16289074]
  59. Vision Res. 2002 Mar;42(5):621-36 [PMID: 11853779]
  60. Psychol Rev. 2012 Jan;119(1):155-85 [PMID: 22229492]
  61. J Cogn Neurosci. 2001 Feb 15;13(2):171-80 [PMID: 11244543]
  62. Brain Res Cogn Brain Res. 2001 Jan;10(3):345-8 [PMID: 11167059]
  63. Mem Cognit. 2005 Jul;33(5):871-86 [PMID: 16383175]
  64. Neuropsychologia. 2012 Jul;50(8):1852-70 [PMID: 22564485]
  65. Brain Res. 2006 Apr 21;1084(1):89-103 [PMID: 16545344]
  66. Cereb Cortex. 2009 Nov;19(11):2659-70 [PMID: 19273459]
  67. Behav Res Methods Instrum Comput. 2004 Aug;36(3):402-7 [PMID: 15641430]
  68. Trends Cogn Sci. 2003 Nov;7(11):489-93 [PMID: 14585445]
  69. Biol Psychol. 2009 Jan;80(1):64-74 [PMID: 18565639]
  70. Neurosci Lett. 2010 Jul 26;479(2):152-6 [PMID: 20580772]
  71. Brain Lang. 2012 Mar;120(3):271-81 [PMID: 21945392]

Grants

  1. F32 HD062043/NICHD NIH HHS
  2. R01 AG026308/NIA NIH HHS
  3. T32 MH019983/NIMH NIH HHS

Word Cloud

Created with Highcharts 10.0.0wordVisualdifferentegERPsresultsrecognitiontypesinformationrangingperceptualsemanticquestionstudiesdivergenttheoreticalrelativelyfactorsmayWordRecognitionRegressionprocesshierarchicallyparalleldrawsorthographiccentralconcernscomeonlineinteractforminitiallyperceivedNumerousaddressingaspectsconductedvarietytechniquesbehavioreye-trackingmodelssuggestingoverallspeedsprocessingcoalescedaroundclustersmostlymethod-specificexaminetimecourseinfluencevariablesbigramfrequencynumberlexicalassociatesERPresponsesanalyzedsingleitemlevelcombinationcriticalreviewliteraturesuggestmethodologicalanalyticledinconsistencypastwillargueconsiderationleadreconciliationviewsspeedNeverSeemFindTime:EvaluatingPhysiologicalTimeCourseAnalysisSingleItemMultiple

Similar Articles

Cited By (35)