Time perception: the bad news and the good.

William J Matthews, Warren H Meck
Author Information
  1. William J Matthews: Department of Psychology, University of Essex, Colchester, UK.
  2. Warren H Meck: Department of Psychology and Neuroscience, Duke University, Durham, NC, USA.

Abstract

Time perception is fundamental and heavily researched, but the field faces a number of obstacles to theoretical progress. In this advanced review, we focus on three pieces of 'bad news' for time perception research: temporal perception is highly labile across changes in experimental context and task; there are pronounced individual differences not just in overall performance but in the use of different timing strategies and the effect of key variables; and laboratory studies typically bear little relation to timing in the 'real world'. We describe recent examples of these issues and in each case offer some 'good news' by showing how new research is addressing these challenges to provide rich insights into the neural and information-processing bases of timing and time perception. WIREs Cogn Sci 2014, 5:429-446. doi: 10.1002/wcs.1298 This article is categorized under: Psychology > Perception and Psychophysics Neuroscience > Cognition.

References

  1. Trends Cogn Sci. 2013 Nov;17(11):556-64 [PMID: 24139486]
  2. Cogn Sci. 2008 Dec;32(8):1248-84 [PMID: 21585453]
  3. Mem Cognit. 1985 Mar;13(2):101-11 [PMID: 4033413]
  4. Brain. 2012 Mar;135(Pt 3):656-77 [PMID: 21921020]
  5. Q J Exp Psychol (Hove). 2007 Sep;60(9):1289-302 [PMID: 17676559]
  6. Atten Percept Psychophys. 2012 Jul;74(5):1056-72 [PMID: 22391892]
  7. J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform. 2007 Jun;33(3):716-29 [PMID: 17563232]
  8. Atten Percept Psychophys. 2009 Aug;71(6):1219-27 [PMID: 19633337]
  9. Neuron. 2007 Feb 1;53(3):427-38 [PMID: 17270738]
  10. PLoS One. 2010 Feb 17;5(2):e9271 [PMID: 20174648]
  11. Percept Psychophys. 1979 May;25(5):432-8 [PMID: 461105]
  12. Acta Psychol (Amst). 2008 May;128(1):63-74 [PMID: 18001688]
  13. Atten Percept Psychophys. 2010 Apr;72(3):561-82 [PMID: 20348562]
  14. Front Integr Neurosci. 2012 Jan 03;5:90 [PMID: 22319477]
  15. Front Integr Neurosci. 2011 Oct 18;5:64 [PMID: 22022309]
  16. J Neurosci. 2012 Jan 18;32(3):1056-60 [PMID: 22262903]
  17. Ann N Y Acad Sci. 1984;423:52-77 [PMID: 6588812]
  18. Psychol Bull. 2001 Jan;127(1):22-44 [PMID: 11271754]
  19. J Vis. 2007 Jul 06;7(10):2.1-5 [PMID: 17997671]
  20. PLoS One. 2013;8(3):e59847 [PMID: 23555804]
  21. Psychon Bull Rev. 1997 Jun;4(2):184-97 [PMID: 21331825]
  22. J Cogn Neurosci. 2011 Oct;23(10):2811-21 [PMID: 21261454]
  23. Acta Psychol (Amst). 2014 Mar;147:111-21 [PMID: 24210181]
  24. J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform. 2011 Feb;37(1):303-13 [PMID: 20731508]
  25. J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform. 2003 Dec;29(6):1102-25 [PMID: 14640833]
  26. Percept Psychophys. 1991 Mar;49(3):245-56 [PMID: 2011462]
  27. Psychol Rev. 2005 Oct;112(4):881-911 [PMID: 16262472]
  28. Nat Chem Biol. 2007 Oct;3(10):594-7 [PMID: 17876310]
  29. Percept Psychophys. 2005 Nov;67(8):1362-75 [PMID: 16555588]
  30. J Neurosci. 1998 Feb 15;18(4):1559-70 [PMID: 9454861]
  31. Wiley Interdiscip Rev Cogn Sci. 2013 Mar;4(2):135-148 [PMID: 26304191]
  32. Percept Psychophys. 1991 Dec;50(6):565-74 [PMID: 1780204]
  33. Acta Psychol (Amst). 2014 Mar;147:60-7 [PMID: 23896562]
  34. J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform. 2011 Oct;37(5):1617-27 [PMID: 21517218]
  35. Acta Psychol (Amst). 2014 Mar;147:97-104 [PMID: 23978665]
  36. PLoS One. 2011 May 09;6(5):e19815 [PMID: 21573020]
  37. Neuroimage. 2009 Oct 1;47(4):1894-903 [PMID: 19376241]
  38. Psychol Rev. 1965 Nov;72(6):407-18 [PMID: 5852241]
  39. Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci. 2014 Jan 20;369(1637):20120459 [PMID: 24446493]
  40. Atten Percept Psychophys. 2012 Nov;74(8):1819-41 [PMID: 23055085]
  41. Annu Rev Neurosci. 2013 Jul 8;36:313-36 [PMID: 23725000]
  42. Psychon Bull Rev. 2007 Oct;14(5):989-93 [PMID: 18087971]
  43. Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci. 2009 Jul 12;364(1525):1865-73 [PMID: 19487189]
  44. Brain Res Cogn Brain Res. 2004 Oct;21(2):139-70 [PMID: 15464348]
  45. Exp Brain Res. 1999 Nov;129(1):121-6 [PMID: 10550509]
  46. Conscious Cogn. 2005 Sep;14(3):474-82 [PMID: 16091266]
  47. Percept Psychophys. 2004 Oct;66(7):1171-89 [PMID: 15751474]
  48. Psychol Rev. 2007 Jul;114(3):577-98 [PMID: 17638497]
  49. Q J Exp Psychol (Hove). 2009 Oct;62(10):1896-903 [PMID: 19459084]
  50. Q J Exp Psychol (Hove). 2009 Oct;62(10):2014-29 [PMID: 19235096]
  51. Acta Psychol (Amst). 2010 Jul;134(3):330-43 [PMID: 20403583]
  52. J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform. 2000 Dec;26(6):1770-87 [PMID: 11129373]
  53. J Neurosci. 2011 Jun 22;31(25):9238-53 [PMID: 21697374]
  54. Q J Exp Psychol B. 1995 Nov;48(4):289-310 [PMID: 8532899]
  55. Front Integr Neurosci. 2011 Nov 21;5:76 [PMID: 22125515]
  56. Wiley Interdiscip Rev Cogn Sci. 2010 Jul;1(4):613-621 [PMID: 26271508]
  57. Neuropharmacology. 2012 Mar;62(3):1221-9 [PMID: 21296093]
  58. Front Integr Neurosci. 2012 Mar 30;6:13 [PMID: 22479240]
  59. Cogn Psychol. 2013 May;66(3):259-82 [PMID: 23395774]
  60. J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform. 2005 Oct;31(5):919-38 [PMID: 16262489]
  61. Q J Exp Psychol (Hove). 2008 Apr;61(4):569-87 [PMID: 18938276]
  62. Curr Opin Neurobiol. 2008 Apr;18(2):131-6 [PMID: 18639634]
  63. Wiley Interdiscip Rev Cogn Sci. 2011 Jul;2(4):419-428 [PMID: 26302201]
  64. Perception. 2013;42(2):198-207 [PMID: 23700958]
  65. Neuropsychopharmacology. 2011 Jan;36(1):3-25 [PMID: 20668434]
  66. Neuropsychologia. 2013 Jan;51(2):284-92 [PMID: 22982605]
  67. Psychol Rev. 2008 Apr;115(2):396-425 [PMID: 18426295]
  68. Behav Processes. 2011 Jan;86(1):68-74 [PMID: 20933588]
  69. Psychol Rev. 1989 Jul;96(3):459-91 [PMID: 2756068]
  70. Wiley Interdiscip Rev Cogn Sci. 2012 May;3(3):293-299 [PMID: 24179564]
  71. Percept Psychophys. 1995 Jan;57(1):105-16 [PMID: 7885802]
  72. J Vis. 2006 Dec 15;6(12):1421-30 [PMID: 17209745]
  73. Acta Psychol (Amst). 2011 Mar;136(3):354-62 [PMID: 21276583]
  74. Psychophysiology. 2011 Feb;48(2):198-207 [PMID: 20557484]
  75. Annu Rev Psychol. 2014;65:743-71 [PMID: 24050187]
  76. J Vis. 2009 Jul 22;9(7):14 [PMID: 19761329]
  77. Psychol Rev. 1957 May;64(3):153-81 [PMID: 13441853]
  78. Atten Percept Psychophys. 2010 May;72(4):871-84 [PMID: 20436185]
  79. Q J Exp Psychol (Hove). 2014;67(6):1121-50 [PMID: 24295428]
  80. Q J Exp Psychol (Hove). 2006 Nov;59(11):1875-908 [PMID: 16987779]
  81. Nat Neurosci. 2010 Aug;13(8):1020-6 [PMID: 20581842]
  82. Percept Psychophys. 1980 Apr;27(4):300-6 [PMID: 7383814]
  83. Adv Exp Med Biol. 2024;1455:3-23 [PMID: 38918343]
  84. Learn Mem. 2003 Mar-Apr;10(2):141-7 [PMID: 12663752]
  85. J Neurosci. 1997 May 15;17(10):3956-63 [PMID: 9133413]
  86. J Exp Psychol Anim Behav Process. 2009 Oct;35(4):525-37 [PMID: 19839705]
  87. PLoS One. 2012;7(3):e33049 [PMID: 22412982]
  88. Neuropsychologia. 2013 Jan;51(2):293-308 [PMID: 22903038]
  89. Front Integr Neurosci. 2011 Sep 12;5:51 [PMID: 21941471]
  90. PLoS One. 2010 Sep 17;5(9): [PMID: 20862259]
  91. Mem Cognit. 2012 Nov;40(8):1339-51 [PMID: 22806428]
  92. J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform. 2012 Aug;38(4):880-90 [PMID: 22390291]
  93. Nat Rev Neurosci. 2005 Oct;6(10):755-65 [PMID: 16163383]

Word Cloud

Created with Highcharts 10.0.0perceptiontimingTimenews'time>fundamentalheavilyresearchedfieldfacesnumberobstaclestheoreticalprogressadvancedreviewfocusthreepieces'badresearch:temporalhighlylabileacrosschangesexperimentalcontexttaskpronouncedindividualdifferencesjustoverallperformanceusedifferentstrategieseffectkeyvariableslaboratorystudiestypicallybearlittlerelation'realworld'describerecentexamplesissuescaseoffer'goodshowingnewresearchaddressingchallengesproviderichinsightsneuralinformation-processingbasesWIREsCognSci20145:429-446doi:101002/wcs1298articlecategorizedunder:PsychologyPerceptionPsychophysicsNeuroscienceCognitionperception:badnewsgood

Similar Articles

Cited By (59)