Systematic implementation of evidence-based practice in a clinical nursing setting: a participatory action research project.

Jolanda H H M Friesen-Storms, Albine Moser, Sandra van der Loo, Anna J H M Beurskens, Gerrie J J W Bours
Author Information
  1. Jolanda H H M Friesen-Storms: Research Centre Autonomy and Participation of Persons with a Chronic Illness, Nursing Department, Zuyd Health, Zuyd University of Applied Science, Heerlen, Netherlands; CAPHRI School for Public Health and Primary Care, Maastricht University, Maastricht, Netherlands.

Abstract

AIMS AND OBJECTIVES: To describe the process of implementing evidence-based practice in a clinical nursing setting.
BACKGROUND: Evidence-based practice has become a major issue in nursing, it is insufficiently integrated into daily practice and its implementation is complex.
DESIGN: Participatory action research.
METHODS: The main participants were nurses working in a lung unit of a rural hospital. A multi-method process of data collection was used during the observing, reflecting, planning and acting phases. Data were continuously gathered during a 24-month period from 2010 to 2012, and analysed using an interpretive constant comparative approach. Patients were consulted to incorporate their perspective.
RESULTS: A best-practice mode of working was prevalent on the ward. The main barriers to the implementation of evidence-based practice were that nurses had little knowledge of evidence-based practice and a rather negative attitude towards it, and that their English reading proficiency was poor. The main facilitators were that nurses wanted to deliver high-quality care and were enthusiastic and open to innovation. Implementation strategies included a tailored interactive outreach training and the development and implementation of an evidence-based discharge protocol. The academic model of evidence-based practice was adapted. Nurses worked according to the evidence-based practice discharge protocol but barely recorded their activities. Nurses favourably evaluated the participatory action research process.
CONCLUSIONS: Action research provides an opportunity to empower nurses and to tailor evidence-based practice to the practice context. Applying and implementing evidence-based practice is difficult for front-line nurses with limited evidence-based practice competencies.
RELEVANCE TO CLINICAL PRACTICE: Adaptation of the academic model of evidence-based practice to a more pragmatic approach seems necessary to introduce evidence-based practice into clinical practice. The use of scientific evidence can be facilitated by using pre-appraised evidence. For clinical practice, it seems relevant to integrate scientific evidence with clinical expertise and patient values in nurses' clinical decision-making at the individual patient level.

Keywords

MeSH Term

Adult
Attitude of Health Personnel
Clinical Nursing Research
Evidence-Based Nursing
Female
Health Services Research
Humans
Male
Middle Aged
Research Design

Word Cloud

Created with Highcharts 10.0.0practiceevidence-basedclinicalimplementationresearchnursesnursingactionprocessmainparticipatoryevidenceimplementingworkingusingapproachdischargeprotocolacademicmodelNursesseemsscientificpatientAIMSANDOBJECTIVES:describesettingBACKGROUND:Evidence-basedbecomemajorissueinsufficientlyintegrateddailycomplexDESIGN:ParticipatoryMETHODS:participantslungunitruralhospitalmulti-methoddatacollectionusedobservingreflectingplanningactingphasesDatacontinuouslygathered24-monthperiod20102012analysedinterpretiveconstantcomparativePatientsconsultedincorporateperspectiveRESULTS:best-practicemodeprevalentwardbarrierslittleknowledgerathernegativeattitudetowardsEnglishreadingproficiencypoorfacilitatorswanteddeliverhigh-qualitycareenthusiasticopeninnovationImplementationstrategiesincludedtailoredinteractiveoutreachtrainingdevelopmentadaptedworkedaccordingbarelyrecordedactivitiesfavourablyevaluatedCONCLUSIONS:ActionprovidesopportunityempowertailorcontextApplyingdifficultfront-linelimitedcompetenciesRELEVANCETOCLINICALPRACTICE:Adaptationpragmaticnecessaryintroduceusecanfacilitatedpre-appraisedrelevantintegrateexpertisevaluesnurses'decision-makingindividuallevelSystematicsetting:project

Similar Articles

Cited By