Field evaluation of the InBios Chagas detect plus rapid test in serum and whole-blood specimens in Bolivia.

Vishal Shah, Lisbeth Ferrufino, Robert H Gilman, Margot Ramirez, Eliana Saenza, Edith Malaga, Gerardo Sanchez, Emi E Okamoto, Jacqueline E Sherbuck, Eva H Clark, Gerson Galdos-Cardenas, Ricardo Bozo, Jorge Luis Flores-Franco, Rony Colanzi, Manuela Verastegui, Caryn Bern
Author Information
  1. Vishal Shah: Saint Louis University School of Medicine, St. Louis, Missouri, USA.
  2. Lisbeth Ferrufino: Universidad Catolica Boliviana, Santa Cruz, Plurinational State of Bolivia.
  3. Robert H Gilman: Johns Hopkins University Bloomberg School of Public Health, Baltimore, Maryland, USA.
  4. Margot Ramirez: Universidad Catolica Boliviana, Santa Cruz, Plurinational State of Bolivia.
  5. Eliana Saenza: Universidad Catolica Boliviana, Santa Cruz, Plurinational State of Bolivia.
  6. Edith Malaga: Laboratorio de Investigaci��n en Enfermedades Infecciosas, Facultad de Ciencias y Filosof��as, Universidad Peruana Cayetano Heredia, Lima, Peru.
  7. Gerardo Sanchez: Laboratorio de Investigaci��n en Enfermedades Infecciosas, Facultad de Ciencias y Filosof��as, Universidad Peruana Cayetano Heredia, Lima, Peru.
  8. Emi E Okamoto: New York University School of Medicine, New York, New York, USA.
  9. Jacqueline E Sherbuck: New York University School of Medicine, New York, New York, USA.
  10. Eva H Clark: Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, Texas, USA.
  11. Gerson Galdos-Cardenas: Universidad Catolica Boliviana, Santa Cruz, Plurinational State of Bolivia Johns Hopkins University Bloomberg School of Public Health, Baltimore, Maryland, USA.
  12. Ricardo Bozo: Hospital Municipal Camiri, Camiri, Plurinational State of Bolivia.
  13. Jorge Luis Flores-Franco: Universidad Catolica Boliviana, Santa Cruz, Plurinational State of Bolivia.
  14. Rony Colanzi: Universidad Catolica Boliviana, Santa Cruz, Plurinational State of Bolivia.
  15. Manuela Verastegui: Laboratorio de Investigaci��n en Enfermedades Infecciosas, Facultad de Ciencias y Filosof��as, Universidad Peruana Cayetano Heredia, Lima, Peru.
  16. Caryn Bern: University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, California, USA Caryn.Bern2@UCSF.EDU.

Abstract

Trypanosoma cruzi causes Chagas disease, which affects an estimated 7 million to 8 million people. Chagas disease is endemic throughout Latin America, with the highest prevalence in Bolivia. Conventional diagnosis requires a well-equipped laboratory with experienced personnel. We evaluated the Chagas Detect Plus (CDP) (InBios, Seattle, WA), a rapid immunochromatographic assay for IgG antibodies to T. cruzi. CDP performance was compared to infection status based on results obtained by indirect hemagglutination assay, immunofluorescent-antibody test, and enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay. Confirmed infection required positive results by at least 2 conventional assays. We used specimens from adults of both sexes in a general hospital in the city of Santa Cruz and from pregnant women in a hospital and children in villages in the Bolivian Chaco, an area of hyperendemicity. CDP was performed in paired whole-blood and serum specimens from 385 individuals in the two hospital studies and in 200 serum specimens from the community study. CDP showed sensitivities/specificities of 96.2% (95% confidence interval, 92.7 to 98.4)/98.8% (95.9 to 99.9) in whole blood and 99.3% (97.5 to 99.9)/96.9% (94.2 to 98.6) in serum, with no differences by sex, age group, or study site. CDP showed excellent sensitivity and specificity in our study population, comparable to those of conventional serology. The test is reliable for field surveys, requires no laboratory equipment, and performed well in serum and whole blood. The CDP could also be used for accurate maternal screening to identify neonates at risk of congenital transmission. CDP performance data in diverse geographic areas are needed to strengthen the evidence base for its use.

References

  1. PLoS Negl Trop Dis. 2013;7(2):e2057 [PMID: 23469296]
  2. Am J Trop Med Hyg. 1969 Jul;18(4):500-5 [PMID: 4978596]
  3. Diagn Microbiol Infect Dis. 2003 Aug;46(4):265-71 [PMID: 12944018]
  4. Am J Trop Med Hyg. 2008 Nov;79(5):755-9 [PMID: 18981518]
  5. J Clin Microbiol. 2008 Jun;46(6):2022-7 [PMID: 18400910]
  6. Lancet. 2010 Apr 17;375(9723):1388-402 [PMID: 20399979]
  7. Biometrics. 1977 Jun;33(2):363-74 [PMID: 884196]
  8. Clin Vaccine Immunol. 2009 Apr;16(4):515-20 [PMID: 19211772]
  9. J Clin Microbiol. 2014 Jul;52(7):2506-12 [PMID: 24808239]
  10. PLoS Negl Trop Dis. 2014 Jun 05;8(6):e2801 [PMID: 24901942]
  11. JAMA. 2007 Nov 14;298(18):2171-81 [PMID: 18000201]
  12. Expert Rev Anti Infect Ther. 2010 Aug;8(8):945-56 [PMID: 20695749]
  13. Am J Trop Med Hyg. 2009 Mar;80(3):410-5 [PMID: 19270291]
  14. Clin Infect Dis. 2009 Dec 1;49(11):1667-74 [PMID: 19877966]
  15. PLoS Negl Trop Dis. 2013 Aug 01;7(8):e2358 [PMID: 23936581]
  16. PLoS Negl Trop Dis. 2014 Feb 20;8(2):e2675 [PMID: 24587456]

Grants

  1. D43 TW006581/FIC NIH HHS
  2. MR/K007467/1/Medical Research Council
  3. R01 AI087776/NIAID NIH HHS
  4. R01-AI087776/NIAID NIH HHS

MeSH Term

Adolescent
Adult
Aged
Aged, 80 and over
Antibodies, Protozoan
Bolivia
Chagas Disease
Child
Child, Preschool
Chromatography, Affinity
Female
Humans
Infant
Male
Middle Aged
Pregnancy
Sensitivity and Specificity
Serum
Trypanosoma cruzi

Chemicals

Antibodies, Protozoan

Word Cloud

Created with Highcharts 10.0.0CDPserumChagasspecimensassaytesthospitalstudy999cruzidisease7millionBoliviarequireslaboratoryInBiosrapidperformanceinfectionresults2conventionalusedperformedwhole-bloodshowed98wholebloodTrypanosomacausesaffectsestimated8peopleendemicthroughoutLatinAmericahighestprevalenceConventionaldiagnosiswell-equippedexperiencedpersonnelevaluatedDetectPlusSeattleWAimmunochromatographicIgGantibodiesTcomparedstatusbasedobtainedindirecthemagglutinationimmunofluorescent-antibodyenzyme-linkedimmunosorbentConfirmedrequiredpositiveleastassaysadultssexesgeneralcitySantaCruzpregnantwomenchildrenvillagesBolivianChacoareahyperendemicitypaired385individualstwostudies200communitysensitivities/specificities962%95%confidenceinterval924/988%953%975/969%946differencessexagegroupsiteexcellentsensitivityspecificitypopulationcomparableserologyreliablefieldsurveysequipmentwellalsoaccuratematernalscreeningidentifyneonatesriskcongenitaltransmissiondatadiversegeographicareasneededstrengthenevidencebaseuseFieldevaluationdetectplus

Similar Articles

Cited By