Long-term survival trends of gastric cancer patients between 1972 and 2011 in Qidong.

Yong-Sheng Chen, Jian-Guo Chen, Jian Zhu, Yong-Hui Zhang, Lu-Lu Ding
Author Information
  1. Yong-Sheng Chen: Qidong Liver Cancer Institute, Qidong People's Hospital, Qidong, Jiangsu, 226200, P.R. China. qdcys@126.com.
  2. Jian-Guo Chen: Qidong Liver Cancer Institute, Qidong People's Hospital, Qidong, Jiangsu, 226200, P.R. China. chenjg@vip.sina.com.
  3. Jian Zhu: Qidong Liver Cancer Institute, Qidong People's Hospital, Qidong, Jiangsu, 226200, P.R. China. jsqdzj8888@sina.com.
  4. Yong-Hui Zhang: Qidong Liver Cancer Institute, Qidong People's Hospital, Qidong, Jiangsu, 226200, P.R. China. 309797940@qq.com.
  5. Lu-Lu Ding: Qidong Liver Cancer Institute, Qidong People's Hospital, Qidong, Jiangsu, 226200, P.R. China. 119448035@qq.com.

Abstract

BACKGROUND: There have been few reports on long-term survival of gastric cancer patients. This study analyzed the survival data of gastric cancer patients obtained from the population-based Qidong Cancer Registry between 1972 and 2011, providing a basis for evaluation of gastric cancer treatment and prognosis.
METHODS: The cumulative observed survival rate and relative survival rate of gastric cancer patients were calculated using Hakulinen's method via the SURV3.01 software, which was developed by the Finnish Cancer Registry. The date of the last follow-up for the survival status of the 15,401 registered cases was April 30, 2012.
RESULTS: The 1-, 5-, 10-, 20-, and 30-year observed survival rates were 33.82%, 14.18%, 10.35%, 6.63%, and 4.19%, respectively, and the 1-, 5-, 10-, 20-, and 30-year relative survival rates were 35.43%, 18.13%, 17.50%, 21.96%, and 32.84%, respectively. For males, the corresponding observed survival rates were 34.50%, 14.40%, 10.42%, 6.46%, and 4.05%, and the corresponding relative survival rates were 36.23%, 18.67%, 18.28%, 23.73%, and 38.61%. For females, the corresponding observed survival rates were 32.62%, 13.80%, 10.22%, 6.95%, and 4.46%, and the corresponding relative survival rates were 34.03%, 17.21%, 16.28%, 19.70%, and 26.78%. Significant differences in relative survival rates were observed between sexes (P = 0.003). For the 15-34, 35-44, 45-54, 55-64, 65-74, and 75+ age groups, the 5-year relative survival rates were 16.13%, 21.77%, 18.63%, 12.61%, 7.99%, and 2.94%, respectively, and the 10-year relative survival rates were 16.49%, 22.83%, 20.50%, 15.97%, 15.88%, and 15.73%, respectively. Remarkable improvement could be observed for the 5-, 10-, and 15-year relative survival rates in Qidong beginning in the 1980s.
CONCLUSION: The survival outcome of registered gastric cancer cases in Qidong showed gradual progress over the past two decades.

References

  1. J Korean Med Sci. 2007 Sep;22 Suppl:S5-S10 [PMID: 17923755]
  2. Chin J Cancer. 2013 Mar;32(3):106-12 [PMID: 23452393]
  3. Ann Oncol. 2005 Jun;16(6):981-6 [PMID: 15849221]
  4. Chin J Cancer. 2013 Sep;32(9):512-9 [PMID: 23149312]
  5. Lancet. 2015 Mar 14;385(9972):977-1010 [PMID: 25467588]
  6. Lancet Oncol. 2014 Jan;15(1):23-34 [PMID: 24314615]
  7. Ann Glob Health. 2014 Sep-Oct;80(5):358-69 [PMID: 25512151]
  8. Int J Cancer. 2006 Sep 15;119(6):1447-54 [PMID: 16596645]
  9. Clin Endosc. 2014 Nov;47(6):478-89 [PMID: 25505712]
  10. Jpn J Clin Oncol. 2006 Sep;36(9):602-7 [PMID: 16870692]
  11. IARC Sci Publ. 2011;(162):23-31 [PMID: 21675403]
  12. IARC Sci Publ. 1991;(95):159-76 [PMID: 1894319]
  13. IARC Sci Publ. 1998;(145):27-35 [PMID: 10194625]
  14. Int J Cancer. 2015 Apr 15;136(8):1921-30 [PMID: 25242378]
  15. BMC Cancer. 2015 Feb 19;15:72 [PMID: 25886269]
  16. Br J Cancer. 2005 May 9;92(9):1808-12 [PMID: 15827554]

MeSH Term

Adolescent
Adult
Age Distribution
Aged
China
Female
Humans
Male
Middle Aged
Mortality
Registries
Sex Distribution
Stomach Neoplasms
Survival Analysis
Young Adult

Word Cloud

Created with Highcharts 10.0.0survivalratesrelativegastriccancerobservedpatientsQidong15respectively18corresponding5-10-106450%16CancerRegistry19722011rateregisteredcases1-20-30-year1463%13%1721323446%28%73%61%BACKGROUND:reportslong-termstudyanalyzeddataobtainedpopulation-basedprovidingbasisevaluationtreatmentprognosisMETHODS:cumulativecalculatedusingHakulinen'smethodviaSURV301softwaredevelopedFinnishdatelastfollow-upstatus401April302012RESULTS:3382%18%35%19%3543%96%84%males40%42%05%3623%67%2338females62%1380%22%95%03%21%1970%2678%SignificantdifferencessexesP=000315-3435-4445-5455-6465-7475+agegroups5-year77%12799%294%10-year49%2283%2097%88%Remarkableimprovement15-yearbeginning1980sCONCLUSION:outcomeshowedgradualprogresspasttwodecadesLong-termtrends

Similar Articles

Cited By