Modeling Classical Swine Fever Outbreak-Related Outcomes.

Shankar Yadav, Nicole J Olynk Widmar, Hsin-Yi Weng
Author Information
  1. Shankar Yadav: Department of Comparative Pathobiology, Purdue University , West Lafayette, IN , USA.
  2. Nicole J Olynk Widmar: Department of Agricultural Economics, Purdue University , West Lafayette, IN , USA.
  3. Hsin-Yi Weng: Department of Comparative Pathobiology, Purdue University , West Lafayette, IN , USA.

Abstract

The study was carried out to estimate classical swine fever (CSF) outbreak-related outcomes, such as epidemic duration and number of infected, vaccinated, and depopulated premises, using defined most likely CSF outbreak scenarios. Risk metrics were established using empirical data to select the most likely CSF outbreak scenarios in Indiana. These scenarios were simulated using a stochastic between-premises disease spread model to estimate outbreak-related outcomes. A total of 19 single-site (i.e., with one index premises at the onset of an outbreak) and 15 multiple-site (i.e., with more than one index premises at the onset of an outbreak) outbreak scenarios of CSF were selected using the risk metrics. The number of index premises in the multiple-site outbreak scenarios ranged from 4 to 32. The multiple-site outbreak scenarios were further classified into clustered (N = 6) and non-clustered (N = 9) groups. The estimated median (5th, 95th percentiles) epidemic duration (days) was 224 (24, 343) in the single-site and was 190 (157, 251) and 210 (167, 302) in the clustered and non-clustered multiple-site outbreak scenarios, respectively. The median (5th, 95th percentiles) number of infected premises was 323 (0, 488) in the single-site outbreak scenarios and was 529 (395, 662) and 465 (295, 640) in the clustered and non-clustered multiple-site outbreak scenarios, respectively. Both the number and spatial distributions of the index premises affected the outcome estimates. The results also showed the importance of implementing vaccinations to accommodate depopulation in the CSF outbreak controls. The use of routinely collected surveillance data in the risk metrics and disease spread model allows end users to generate timely outbreak-related information based on the initial outbreak's characteristics. Swine producers can use this information to make an informed decision on the management of swine operations and continuity of business, so that potential losses could be minimized during a CSF outbreak. Government authorities might use the information to make emergency preparedness plans for CSF outbreak control.

Keywords

References

  1. Prev Vet Med. 2005 Jan;67(1):19-37 [PMID: 15698906]
  2. Rev Sci Tech. 2006 Dec;25(3):1025-38 [PMID: 17361768]
  3. Vet Microbiol. 2000 Apr 13;73(2-3):103-19 [PMID: 10785321]
  4. Vet Microbiol. 2000 Nov 15;77(1-2):3-15 [PMID: 11042396]
  5. Prev Vet Med. 2014 Dec 1;117(3-4):487-504 [PMID: 25457133]
  6. Vet Microbiol. 2005 Jul 1;108(3-4):187-98 [PMID: 15908147]
  7. Vet Rec. 2007 May 19;160(20):687-90 [PMID: 17513834]
  8. Prev Vet Med. 2009 Aug 1;90(3-4):180-93 [PMID: 19439381]
  9. PLoS One. 2014 Apr 18;9(4):e95278 [PMID: 24748233]
  10. Can Vet J. 2002 Nov;43(11):855-62 [PMID: 12497962]
  11. Trends Microbiol. 2006 Mar;14(3):125-31 [PMID: 16460942]
  12. Prev Vet Med. 2002 Dec 18;56(2):141-63 [PMID: 12450686]
  13. Math Biosci. 2003 Dec;186(2):145-73 [PMID: 14583170]
  14. J Am Vet Med Assoc. 2014 May 1;244(9):1066-74 [PMID: 24739117]
  15. Prev Vet Med. 1999 Dec 1;42(3-4):157-84 [PMID: 10619154]
  16. Vet Rec. 2001 Sep 29;149(13):377-82 [PMID: 11601514]
  17. Prev Vet Med. 1999 Dec 1;42(3-4):297-317 [PMID: 10619161]
  18. Transbound Emerg Dis. 2011 Jun;58(3):187-96 [PMID: 21303492]
  19. J Am Vet Med Assoc. 2004 Apr 1;224(7):1105-9 [PMID: 15074855]
  20. Prev Vet Med. 1999 Dec 1;42(3-4):271-95 [PMID: 10619160]
  21. Prev Vet Med. 2003 Jul 30;60(1):27-36 [PMID: 12900147]
  22. Vet Microbiol. 2000 Apr 13;73(2-3):221-37 [PMID: 10785330]
  23. Vet Microbiol. 2011 Jan 27;147(3-4):300-9 [PMID: 20708351]
  24. Prev Vet Med. 2011 Apr 1;99(1):28-37 [PMID: 21300412]
  25. Prev Vet Med. 2007 Sep 14;81(1-3):21-37 [PMID: 17482296]
  26. Prev Vet Med. 1999 Dec 1;42(3-4):249-70 [PMID: 10619159]
  27. Epidemiol Infect. 2002 Apr;128(2):285-91 [PMID: 12002547]

Word Cloud

Created with Highcharts 10.0.0outbreakscenariosCSFpremisesmultiple-siteswinenumberusingdiseaseindexoutbreak-relatedepidemicmetricssingle-siteclusterednon-clustereduseinformationestimateclassicalfeveroutcomesdurationinfectedlikelydataspreadmodelieoneonsetriskmedian5th95thpercentilesrespectivelySwinemakecontrolstudycarriedvaccinateddepopulateddefinedRiskestablishedempiricalselectIndianasimulatedstochasticbetween-premisestotal1915selectedranged432classifiedN = 6N = 9groupsestimateddays224243431901572512101673023230488529395662465295640spatialdistributionsaffectedoutcomeestimatesresultsalsoshowedimportanceimplementingvaccinationsaccommodatedepopulationcontrolsroutinelycollectedsurveillanceallowsendusersgeneratetimelybasedinitialoutbreak'scharacteristicsproducerscaninformeddecisionmanagementoperationscontinuitybusinesspotentiallossesminimizedGovernmentauthoritiesmightemergencypreparednessplansModelingClassicalFeverOutbreak-RelatedOutcomesmodelingpigs

Similar Articles

Cited By