A comparative study of the electromyographic activities of lower extremity muscles during level walking and Pedalo riding.

DongGeon Lee, YouJeong Kim, JiHyeon Yun, MiHye Jung, GyuChang Lee
Author Information
  1. DongGeon Lee: 1) Department of Physical Therapy, Kyungnam University, Republic of Korea.
  2. YouJeong Kim: 1) Department of Physical Therapy, Kyungnam University, Republic of Korea.
  3. JiHyeon Yun: 1) Department of Physical Therapy, Kyungnam University, Republic of Korea.
  4. MiHye Jung: 1) Department of Physical Therapy, Kyungnam University, Republic of Korea.
  5. GyuChang Lee: 1) Department of Physical Therapy, Kyungnam University, Republic of Korea.

Abstract

[Purpose] To analyze the electromyographic (EMG) activities of several lower extremity muscles during ground walking and pedaling using the Pedalo Reha-Bar device. [Subjects and Methods] Fifteen healthy adults aged 20-29 year participated in this study. The subjects' surface EMG signals while walking and Pedalo Reha-Bar riding were recorded. The subjects performed 20 steps on flat ground and 20 cycles on the Pedalo Reha-Bar. During the tasks, EMG signals of the rectus femoris, biceps femoris, tibialis anterior, soleus, and gastrocnemius within a 20-second period were recorded. The mean EMG signals within the 10 seconds from 6 to 15 seconds were used for the data analysis. [Results] There was a significant increase in the bilateral use of the rectus femoris and a significant decrease in the use of the left tibialis anterior and left soleus in pedaling using the Pedalo Reha-Bar device compared to ground walking. [Conclusion] Level walking and the Pedalo Reha-Bar riding utilize different types of muscles activities. These results suggest that Pedalo Reha-Bar riding may be used for neuromuscular activation, especially of the rectus femoris.

Keywords

References

  1. J Mot Behav. 2005 May;37(3):247-56 [PMID: 15883122]
  2. J Phys Ther Sci. 2015 Sep;27(9):2871-3 [PMID: 26504314]
  3. Int J Sports Phys Ther. 2014 Feb;9(1):76-81 [PMID: 24567858]
  4. J Phys Ther Sci. 2015 Apr;27(4):1247-50 [PMID: 25995599]
  5. J Phys Ther Sci. 2015 Nov;27(11):3529-31 [PMID: 26696731]
  6. Pediatr Phys Ther. 2002 Spring;14(1):2-15 [PMID: 17053676]
  7. Ethn Dis. 2007 Summer;17(3):503-7 [PMID: 17985505]
  8. Gait Posture. 2004 Jun;19(3):270-8 [PMID: 15125916]
  9. Arch Gerontol Geriatr. 2014 Nov-Dec;59(3):574-6 [PMID: 25179442]
  10. Ayu. 2012 Jan;33(1):44-9 [PMID: 23049183]
  11. J Phys Ther Sci. 2015 Sep;27(9):2837-40 [PMID: 26504305]
  12. J Electromyogr Kinesiol. 2000 Oct;10(5):361-74 [PMID: 11018445]
  13. J Electromyogr Kinesiol. 2001 Dec;11(6):413-23 [PMID: 11738954]
  14. J Electromyogr Kinesiol. 2013 Oct;23(5):1145-9 [PMID: 23880233]
  15. Ann Intern Med. 2002 Apr 2;136(7):493-503 [PMID: 11926784]
  16. Clin Biomech (Bristol, Avon). 2006 Jan;21(1):75-81 [PMID: 16169641]
  17. Rev Port Pneumol. 2014 Mar-Apr;20(2):69-77 [PMID: 24290563]
  18. J Neurophysiol. 2006 Jun;95(6):3426-37 [PMID: 16554517]

Word Cloud

Created with Highcharts 10.0.0PedaloReha-BarwalkingEMGridingfemorisactivitiesmusclesgroundsignalsrectuselectromyographiclowerextremitypedalingusingdevicestudyrecorded20tibialisanteriorsoleuswithinsecondsusedsignificantuseleft[Purpose]analyzeseveral[SubjectsMethods]Fifteenhealthyadultsaged20-29yearparticipatedsubjects'surfacesubjectsperformedstepsflatcyclestasksbicepsgastrocnemius20-secondperiodmean10615dataanalysis[Results]increasebilateraldecreasecompared[Conclusion]LevelutilizedifferenttypesresultssuggestmayneuromuscularactivationespeciallycomparativelevelElectromyographyWalking

Similar Articles

Cited By (2)