[Standard operating procedures (SOPs) for palliative care : Presence and relevance of palliative SOPs within the network of German Comprehensive Cancer Centers (CCCs) funded by the German Cancer Aid].

P Stachura, J Berendt, S Stiel, U S Schuler, C Ostgathe
Author Information
  1. P Stachura: Palliativmedizinische Abteilung, Universitätsklinikum Erlangen, Krankenhausstraße 12, 91054, Erlangen, Deutschland. peter.stachura@uk-erlangen.de.
  2. J Berendt: Palliativmedizinische Abteilung, Universitätsklinikum Erlangen, Krankenhausstraße 12, 91054, Erlangen, Deutschland.
  3. S Stiel: Palliativmedizinische Abteilung, Universitätsklinikum Erlangen, Krankenhausstraße 12, 91054, Erlangen, Deutschland.
  4. U S Schuler: Arbeitsgruppe Palliativmedizin im Netzwerk der deutschen Comprehensive Cancer Center.
  5. C Ostgathe: Palliativmedizinische Abteilung, Universitätsklinikum Erlangen, Krankenhausstraße 12, 91054, Erlangen, Deutschland.

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Standard operating procedures (SOPs) can contribute to the improvement of patient care.
OBJECTIVES: Survey the presence and relevance of SOPs for palliative care (PC) within the network of German Comprehensive Cancer Centers (CCCs) funded by the German Cancer Aid.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: In a descriptive survey, palliative care services within 15 CCCs funded by the German Cancer Aid were asked to rate availability and thematic relevance of (1) symptom-related, (2) clinical pathways and (3) measures- and processes-oriented SOPs using a structured questionnaire.
RESULTS: Pain management SOPs were the most common (n =11; 73 %). The most thematic relevance showed SOPs dedicated to pain management, care in the last days of life and delirium and other neuro-psychiatric diseases (each n =13; 87 %), followed by bowel obstruction, dyspnoea, nausea and palliative sedation (each n =12; 80 %).
CONCLUSIONS: There is a wide gap between availability and perceived relevance of palliative care SOPs within the network of German CCCs funded by the German Cancer Aid. It is obvious that there is a need for further development of relevant SOPs in palliative care.

Keywords

References

  1. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2012 Jul 15;83(4):1246-51 [PMID: 22245207]
  2. Rural Remote Health. 2012;12:1992 [PMID: 23116429]
  3. Ann Palliat Med. 2015 Jul;4(3):99-121 [PMID: 26231807]
  4. BMJ. 1998 Jan 10;316(7125):133-7 [PMID: 9462322]
  5. Breast Care (Basel). 2011;6(3):240-244 [PMID: 21779232]
  6. BMC Health Serv Res. 2008 Dec 19;8:265 [PMID: 19094244]
  7. Health Info Libr J. 2007 Jun;24(2):78-94 [PMID: 17584211]
  8. GMS Curr Top Otorhinolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2013 Dec 13;12:Doc09 [PMID: 24403977]
  9. Surgery. 2003 Mar;133(3):277-82 [PMID: 12660639]
  10. Br J Surg. 2013 Jan;100(1):105-12 [PMID: 23161343]
  11. Anaesthesist. 2015 Nov;64(11):874-83 [PMID: 26481389]
  12. BMJ. 1999 Feb 20;318(7182):527-30 [PMID: 10024268]
  13. Support Care Cancer. 2011 Jul;19(7):1037-43 [PMID: 21432009]
  14. Ann Palliat Med. 2015 Jan;4(1):3-4 [PMID: 25813413]
  15. J Palliat Med. 2013 Mar;16(3):289-94 [PMID: 23343113]

MeSH Term

Cancer Care Facilities
Comprehensive Health Care
Germany
Health Services Research
Humans
National Health Programs
Palliative Care
Quality Improvement
Terminal Care

Word Cloud

Created with Highcharts 10.0.0SOPscarepalliativeGermanCancerrelevancewithinfundedoperatingnetworkComprehensiveCCCsAidStandardproceduresCentersavailabilitythematicmanagementBACKGROUND:cancontributeimprovementpatientOBJECTIVES:SurveypresencePCMATERIALSANDMETHODS:a descriptivesurveyservices15 CCCsaskedrate1symptom-related2clinicalpathways3measures-processes-orientedusinga structuredquestionnaireRESULTS:Paincommonn =1173 %showeddedicatedpainlastdayslifedeliriumneuro-psychiatricdiseasesn =1387 %followedbowelobstructiondyspnoeanauseasedationn =1280 %CONCLUSIONS:a widegapperceivedobviousa needdevelopmentrelevant[Standard:PresenceAid]ClinicalpathwayCenterPalliativeQualityprocedure

Similar Articles

Cited By