Applicability of Two Universally Accepted Mixed Dentition Analysis on a Sample from Southeastern Region of Andhra Pradesh, India.

M B Shobha, Sai Ajs, Kmg Manoj, E Srideevi, M Sridhar, Gmjs Pratap
Author Information
  1. M B Shobha: Department of Pedodontics and Preventive Dentistry, S.V.S. Dental College, Mahbubnagar, Telangana, India.
  2. Sai Ajs: Department of Pedodontics and Preventive Dentistry, Sibar Institute of Dental Sciences, Guntur, Andhra Pradesh, India.
  3. Kmg Manoj: Department of Pedodontics and Preventive Dentistry, S.V.S. Dental College, Mahbubnagar, Telangana, India.
  4. E Srideevi: Department of Pedodontics and Preventive Dentistry, Sibar Institute of Dental Sciences, Guntur, Andhra Pradesh, India.
  5. M Sridhar: Department of Pedodontics and Preventive Dentistry, Sibar Institute of Dental Sciences, Guntur, Andhra Pradesh, India.
  6. Gmjs Pratap: Department of Pedodontics and Preventive Dentistry, Sibar Institute of Dental Sciences, Guntur, Andhra Pradesh, India.

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Most of the universally accepted mixed dentition analyses are based on the data derived from northwestern European descent. However, the accuracy of these methods when applied to different ethnic population is questionable.
AIM: The present study is aimed to evaluate the applicability of Tanaka and Johnston (TJ) and Moyers (50(th) and 75(th) percentile) mixed dentition analysis in a sample from south-eastern region of Andhra Pradesh, India.
SUBJECTS AND METHODS: Study models were prepared from a sample of 100 patients (50 males and 50 females) in the age range of 13-15 years. The mesio-distal dimension of the teeth was measured using a Digital Vernier calipers. The actual values of permanent canine and premolars on the casts were compared with the predicted values from TJ and Moyers analysis. The values derived from this study were statistically analyzed using SPSS version 17.0 (IBM, Chicago, USA). Pearson's coefficients were used to evaluate the correlations between the groups of teeth.
RESULTS: Overestimated values were noticed in males and females of both arches with TJ equation; Males showed no significant difference at Moyers 50(th) percentile (50/100), in both the arches where as females showed higher values in mandibular arch and underestimated values in maxillary arch. At Moyers 75(th) percentile, overestimated values were noticed in males for both the arches whereas in females lesser values were observed.
CONCLUSION: As the values showed significant deviation from TJ and Moyers both at 50 and 75 percentile, its applicability to the present population is limited. So, new regression equations were derived.

Keywords

References

  1. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2010 Sep;138(3):339-45 [PMID: 20816304]
  2. Eur J Orthod. 2000 Apr;22(2):127-34 [PMID: 10822885]
  3. J Dent Res. 1967 Sep-Oct;46(5):963-72 [PMID: 5234039]
  4. Indian J Dent Res. 2009 Jan-Mar;20(1):26-30 [PMID: 19336856]
  5. Angle Orthod. 2002 Jun;72(3):216-21 [PMID: 12071605]
  6. J Dent Res. 1957 Feb;36(1):39-47 [PMID: 13398501]
  7. BMC Oral Health. 2012 Jul 23;12:23 [PMID: 22824246]
  8. Eur J Paediatr Dent. 2012 Mar;13(1):29-34 [PMID: 22455525]
  9. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 1998 Nov;114(5):573-6 [PMID: 9810053]
  10. Eur J Paediatr Dent. 2005 Jun;6(2):97-104 [PMID: 16004539]
  11. J Clin Pediatr Dent. 2007 Fall;32(1):43-7 [PMID: 18274469]
  12. Int J Paediatr Dent. 2006 Mar;16(2):104-10 [PMID: 16430524]
  13. Orthod Craniofac Res. 2003 Aug;6(3):173-6 [PMID: 12962200]
  14. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 1997 Nov;112(5):545-51 [PMID: 9387842]
  15. Angle Orthod. 2008 Jul;78(4):670-5 [PMID: 18302466]
  16. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2003 Aug;124(2):178-83 [PMID: 12923514]
  17. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 1998 Mar;113(3):293-9 [PMID: 9517721]
  18. J Orthod. 2009 Dec;36(4):253-9 [PMID: 19934243]
  19. J Am Dent Assoc. 1974 Apr 1;88(4):798-801 [PMID: 4525402]
  20. J Dent Res. 1965 Mar-Apr;44:439-41 [PMID: 14278205]
  21. J Coll Physicians Surg Pak. 2010 Aug;20(8):533-7 [PMID: 20688019]
  22. Prog Orthod. 2014 Jan 06;15:4 [PMID: 24393608]

Word Cloud

Created with Highcharts 10.0.0valuesMoyers50analysisTJthpercentilefemalesdentitionderived75malesarchesshowedmixedpopulationpresentstudyevaluateapplicabilityTanakaJohnstonsampleAndhraPradeshIndiateethusingnoticedsignificantarchMixedBACKGROUND:universallyacceptedanalysesbaseddatanorthwesternEuropeandescentHoweveraccuracymethodsapplieddifferentethnicquestionableAIM:aimedsouth-easternregionSUBJECTSANDMETHODS:Studymodelsprepared100patientsagerange13-15yearsmesio-distaldimensionmeasuredDigitalVerniercalipersactualpermanentcaninepremolarscastscomparedpredictedstatisticallyanalyzedSPSSversion170IBMChicagoUSAPearson'scoefficientsusedcorrelationsgroupsRESULTS:OverestimatedequationMalesdifference50/100highermandibularunderestimatedmaxillaryoverestimatedwhereaslesserobservedCONCLUSION:deviationlimitednewregressionequationsApplicabilityTwoUniversallyAcceptedDentitionAnalysisSampleSoutheasternRegion

Similar Articles

Cited By

No available data.