Evolution of gastric surgery techniques and outcomes.

Hironori Shiozaki, Yusuke Shimodaira, Elena Elimova, Roopma Wadhwa, Kazuki Sudo, Kazuto Harada, Jeannelyn S Estrella, Prajnan Das, Brian Badgwell, Jaffer A Ajani
Author Information
  1. Hironori Shiozaki: Department of Gastrointestinal Medical Oncology, Unit 426, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, 1515 Holcombe Blvd, Houston, TX, 77030, USA.
  2. Yusuke Shimodaira: Department of Gastrointestinal Medical Oncology, Unit 426, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, 1515 Holcombe Blvd, Houston, TX, 77030, USA.
  3. Elena Elimova: Department of Gastrointestinal Medical Oncology, Unit 426, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, 1515 Holcombe Blvd, Houston, TX, 77030, USA.
  4. Roopma Wadhwa: Department of Gastrointestinal Medical Oncology, Unit 426, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, 1515 Holcombe Blvd, Houston, TX, 77030, USA.
  5. Kazuki Sudo: National Cancer Center Hospital, Tokyo, 104-0045, Japan.
  6. Kazuto Harada: Department of Gastrointestinal Medical Oncology, Unit 426, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, 1515 Holcombe Blvd, Houston, TX, 77030, USA.
  7. Jeannelyn S Estrella: Department of Pathology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, 77030, USA.
  8. Prajnan Das: Department of Radiation Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, 77030, USA.
  9. Brian Badgwell: Department of Surgical Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, 77030, USA.
  10. Jaffer A Ajani: Department of Gastrointestinal Medical Oncology, Unit 426, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, 1515 Holcombe Blvd, Houston, TX, 77030, USA. jajani@mdanderson.org.

Abstract

Surgical management of gastric cancer improves survival. However, for some time, surgeons have had diverse opinions about the extent of gastrectomy. Researchers have conducted many clinical studies, making slow but steady progress in determining the optimal surgical approach. The extent of lymph node dissection has been one of the major issues in surgery for gastric cancer. Many trials demonstrated that D2 dissection resulted in greater morbidity and mortality than D1 dissection. However, long-term outcomes demonstrated that D2 dissection resulted in longer survival than D1 dissection. In 2004, the Japan Clinical Oncology Group reported a pivotal trial which was performed to determine whether para-aortic lymph node dissection combined with D2 dissection was superior to D2 dissection alone and found no benefit of the additional surgery. Gastrectomy with pancreatectomy, splenectomy, and bursectomy was initially recommended as part of the D2 dissection. Now, pancreas-preserving total gastrectomy with D2 dissection is standard, and ongoing trials are addressing the role of splenectomy. Furthermore, the feasibility and safety of laparoscopic gastrectomy are well established. Survival and quality of life are increasingly recognized as the most important endpoints. In this review, we present perspectives on surgical techniques and important trials of these techniques in gastric cancer patients.

Keywords

References

  1. Br J Cancer. 2004 May 4;90(9):1727-32 [PMID: 15150592]
  2. N Engl J Med. 1999 Mar 25;340(12):908-14 [PMID: 10089184]
  3. J Clin Oncol. 2004 Jul 15;22(14):2767-73 [PMID: 15199090]
  4. Surg Endosc. 2005 Sep;19(9):1172-6 [PMID: 16132323]
  5. Lancet Oncol. 2006 Apr;7(4):309-15 [PMID: 16574546]
  6. Lancet. 1996 Apr 13;347(9007):995-9 [PMID: 8606613]
  7. Gastric Cancer. 2012 Jan;15(1):42-8 [PMID: 21573917]
  8. Eur J Surg Oncol. 2004 Apr;30(3):303-8 [PMID: 15028313]
  9. Chin J Cancer. 2015 Oct 19;34(12):602-7 [PMID: 26481511]
  10. Gastric Cancer. 2011 Jun;14(2):113-23 [PMID: 21573742]
  11. Surgery. 2002 Apr;131(4):401-7 [PMID: 11935130]
  12. Br J Cancer. 1999 Mar;79(9-10):1522-30 [PMID: 10188901]
  13. Jpn J Clin Oncol. 2010 Sep;40 Suppl 1:i28-37 [PMID: 20870917]
  14. Jpn J Clin Oncol. 2011 Jan;41(1):139-47 [PMID: 20819836]
  15. J Natl Compr Canc Netw. 2013 May 1;11(5):531-46 [PMID: 23667204]
  16. Br J Cancer. 2008 Jan 15;98(1):54-9 [PMID: 18182977]
  17. Int J Cancer. 2009 Aug 1;125(3):666-73 [PMID: 19382179]
  18. Br J Surg. 2014 Jan;101(2):23-31 [PMID: 24375296]
  19. Surgery. 2002 Jan;131(1 Suppl):S306-11 [PMID: 11821829]
  20. Br Med J. 1910 Feb 12;1(2563):366-70 [PMID: 20764919]
  21. Surg Endosc. 2013 Nov;27(11):4267-76 [PMID: 23793805]
  22. Ann Surg. 2008 Nov;248(5):721-7 [PMID: 18948798]
  23. Lancet. 1995 Mar 25;345(8952):745-8 [PMID: 7891484]
  24. Jpn J Clin Oncol. 2012 Feb;42(2):154 [PMID: 22291209]
  25. J Clin Oncol. 2004 Jun 1;22(11):2069-77 [PMID: 15082726]
  26. N Engl J Med. 2008 Jul 31;359(5):453-62 [PMID: 18669424]
  27. Ann Surg. 2010 Mar;251(3):417-20 [PMID: 20160637]
  28. Gastric Cancer. 2010 Nov;13(4):238-44 [PMID: 21128059]
  29. Surg Endosc. 2005 Feb;19(2):168-73 [PMID: 15580441]
  30. Ann Surg Oncol. 2000 Oct;7(9):669-73 [PMID: 11034244]
  31. Br J Surg. 2010 May;97(5):643-9 [PMID: 20186890]
  32. Chin J Cancer. 2013 Mar;32(3):106-12 [PMID: 23452393]
  33. CA Cancer J Clin. 2011 Mar-Apr;61(2):69-90 [PMID: 21296855]
  34. Ann Surg. 2005 Feb;241(2):232-7 [PMID: 15650632]
  35. Lancet Oncol. 2010 May;11(5):439-49 [PMID: 20409751]
  36. Jpn J Clin Oncol. 2013 Mar;43(3):324-7 [PMID: 23275644]
  37. Br J Surg. 2006 May;93(5):559-63 [PMID: 16607678]

Grants

  1. P30 CA016672/NCI NIH HHS
  2. R01 CA138671/NCI NIH HHS
  3. R01 CA172741/NCI NIH HHS
  4. F30 CA210334/NCI NIH HHS

MeSH Term

Gastrectomy
Humans
Lymph Node Excision
Prognosis
Stomach Neoplasms

Word Cloud

Created with Highcharts 10.0.0dissectionD2gastriccancergastrectomynodesurgerytrialstechniquessurvivalHoweverextentsurgicallymphdemonstratedresultedD1outcomesGastrectomysplenectomyimportantSurgicalmanagementimprovestimesurgeonsdiverseopinionsResearchersconductedmanyclinicalstudiesmakingslowsteadyprogressdeterminingoptimalapproachonemajorissuesManygreatermorbiditymortalitylong-termlonger2004JapanClinicalOncologyGroupreportedpivotaltrialperformeddeterminewhetherpara-aorticcombinedsuperioralonefoundbenefitadditionalpancreatectomybursectomyinitiallyrecommendedpartNowpancreas-preservingtotalstandardongoingaddressingroleFurthermorefeasibilitysafetylaparoscopicwellestablishedSurvivalqualitylifeincreasinglyrecognizedendpointsreviewpresentperspectivespatientsEvolutionGastricLaparoscopicLymph

Similar Articles

Cited By (11)