The Effects of Multiple Exemplar Instruction on the Relation Between Listener and Intraverbal Categorization Repertoires.

Sarah A Lechago, James E Carr, April N Kisamore, Laura L Grow
Author Information
  1. Sarah A Lechago: Department of Psychology, University of Houston-Clear Lake, 2700 Bay Area Boulevard, Suite 2617, Houston, TX 77058-1098 USA.
  2. James E Carr: Auburn University, Auburn, AL USA ; Behavior Analyst Certification Board, 8051 Shaffer Parkway, Littleton, CO 80127 USA.
  3. April N Kisamore: Western New England College, Springfield, MA USA ; Caldwell University, 120 Bloomfield Avenue, Caldwell, NJ 07006 USA.
  4. Laura L Grow: St. Cloud State University, St. Cloud, MN USA ; University of British Columbia, Vancouver campus, 2125 Main Mall, Vancouver, BC V6T 1Z4 Canada.

Abstract

We evaluated the effects of multiple exemplar instruction (MEI) on the relation between listener and intraverbal categorization repertoires of six typically developing preschool-age children using a nonconcurrent multiple-probe design across participants. After failing to emit intraverbal categorization responses following listener categorization training, participants were exposed to MEI in the form of alternating response forms (listener and intraverbal) during categorization training with novel stimulus sets. For two participants for whom there was some evidence of emergent intraverbal responding, responding was variable. For the remaining four participants, 32 to 99 MEI trial blocks produced minimal improvement in responding or no emergent responding at all. The results are discussed in terms of Skinner's analysis of verbal behavior and naming theory.

Keywords

References

  1. J Appl Behav Anal. 2008 Spring;41(1):53-68 [PMID: 18468279]
  2. Anal Verbal Behav. 2007;23:71-87 [PMID: 22477382]
  3. Anal Verbal Behav. 2004;20:63-76 [PMID: 22477290]
  4. Anal Verbal Behav. 2005;21:27-41 [PMID: 22477312]
  5. Anal Verbal Behav. 2011;27(1):157-77 [PMID: 22532761]
  6. J Exp Anal Behav. 2005 Jan;83(1):47-65 [PMID: 15762380]
  7. J Appl Behav Anal. 2007 Fall;40(3):431-45 [PMID: 17970258]
  8. J Appl Behav Anal. 1995 Spring;28(1):3-14 [PMID: 7706148]
  9. J Exp Anal Behav. 1985 Jan;43(1):5-19 [PMID: 16812407]
  10. J Appl Behav Anal. 1973 Summer;6(2):311-29 [PMID: 16795412]
  11. Anal Verbal Behav. 2005;21:99-116 [PMID: 22477316]
  12. J Exp Anal Behav. 2008 May;89(3):383-405 [PMID: 18540221]
  13. Anal Verbal Behav. 1999;16:45-8 [PMID: 22477157]
  14. Behav Anal. 2003 Fall;26(2):195-213 [PMID: 22478402]
  15. J Exp Anal Behav. 1996 Jan;65(1):185-241 [PMID: 16812780]
  16. J Appl Behav Anal. 2011 Winter;44(4):859-76 [PMID: 22219535]
  17. Anal Verbal Behav. 2005;21:123-34 [PMID: 22477318]
  18. J Exp Anal Behav. 2004 May;81(3):267-88 [PMID: 15357510]
  19. J Exp Anal Behav. 2002 Nov;78(3):527-49 [PMID: 12507018]

Word Cloud

Created with Highcharts 10.0.0intraverbalcategorizationparticipantsrespondingMEIlistenerbehaviorexemplarinstructiontrainingemergentMultipleListenerIntraverbalCategorizationevaluatedeffectsmultiplerelationrepertoiressixtypicallydevelopingpreschool-agechildrenusingnonconcurrentmultiple-probedesignacrossfailingemitresponsesfollowingexposedformalternatingresponseformsnovelstimulussetstwoevidencevariableremainingfour3299trialblocksproducedminimalimprovementresultsdiscussedtermsSkinner'sanalysisverbalnamingtheoryEffectsExemplarInstructionRelationRepertoiresNaming

Similar Articles

Cited By