Measuring sperm backflow following female orgasm: a new method.

Robert King, Maria Dempsey, Katherine A Valentine
Author Information
  1. Robert King: School of Applied Psychology, University College Cork, Cork, Ireland; r.king@ucc.ie.
  2. Maria Dempsey: School of Applied Psychology, University College Cork, Cork, Ireland.
  3. Katherine A Valentine: Lecturer in Psychology at Chapman University, Orange, CA, USA.

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Human female orgasm is a vexed question in the field while there is credible evidence of cryptic female choice that has many hallmarks of orgasm in other species. Our initial goal was to produce a proof of concept for allowing females to study an aspect of infertility in a home setting, specifically by aligning the study of human infertility and increased fertility with the study of other mammalian fertility. In the latter case - the realm of oxytocin-mediated sperm retention mechanisms seems to be at work in terms of ultimate function (differential sperm retention) while the proximate function (rapid transport or cervical tenting) remains unresolved.
METHOD: A repeated measures design using an easily taught technique in a natural setting was used. Participants were a small (n=6), non-representative sample of females. The introduction of a sperm-simulant combined with an orgasm-producing technique using a vibrator/home massager and other easily supplied materials.
RESULTS: The sperm flowback (simulated) was measured using a technique that can be used in a home setting. There was a significant difference in simulant retention between the orgasm (M=4.08, SD=0.17) and non-orgasm (M=3.30, SD=0.22) conditions; t (5)=7.02, p=0.001. Cohen's d=3.97, effect size r=0.89. This indicates a medium to small effect size.
CONCLUSIONS: This method could allow females to test an aspect of sexual response that has been linked to lowered fertility in a home setting with minimal training. It needs to be replicated with a larger sample size.

Keywords

References

  1. Brain Res. 2004 Oct 22;1024(1-2):77-88 [PMID: 15451368]
  2. Int J Androl. 1986 Dec;9(6):401-6 [PMID: 3553035]
  3. J Urol. 2005 Oct;174(4 Pt 1):1189-95 [PMID: 16145367]
  4. Brain Res. 1996 Feb 5;708(1-2):128-34 [PMID: 8720868]
  5. Arch Sex Behav. 1994 Feb;23(1):59-79 [PMID: 8135652]
  6. J Urol. 1998 Jun;159(6):1892-7 [PMID: 9598482]
  7. BMJ. 1999 Dec 18-25;319(7225):1596-600 [PMID: 10600954]
  8. J Androl. 2005 Jul-Aug;26(4):459-69 [PMID: 15955884]
  9. Arch Sex Behav. 2002 Oct;31(5):405-11 [PMID: 12238607]
  10. Arch Sex Behav. 2012 Oct;41(5):1145-60 [PMID: 23054257]
  11. J Sex Marital Ther. 2007 Jul-Sep;33(4):319-27 [PMID: 17541850]
  12. J Sex Med. 2011 Jun;8(6):1566-78 [PMID: 21210957]
  13. J Sex Med. 2011 Oct;8(10):2822-30 [PMID: 21797981]
  14. Arch Sex Behav. 2013 Nov;42(8):1545-54 [PMID: 23857519]
  15. J Reprod Fertil. 1986 Sep;78(1):239-49 [PMID: 3761269]
  16. Ann N Y Acad Sci. 2007 Apr;1101:1-20 [PMID: 17416925]
  17. Proc Biol Sci. 1998 May 22;265(1399):927-33 [PMID: 9633114]
  18. Int J Androl. 1989 Jun;12(3):187-94 [PMID: 2767779]
  19. J Reprod Fertil. 1970 Jul;22(2):243-51 [PMID: 5428946]
  20. Arch Sex Behav. 1985 Oct;14(5):439-49 [PMID: 4062540]
  21. Gynecol Obstet Invest. 1999;47(2):125-6 [PMID: 9949283]
  22. J Sex Res. 2002 May;39(2):104-13 [PMID: 12476242]
  23. J Sex Marital Ther. 1976 Fall;2(3):205-13 [PMID: 13226]
  24. Cereb Cortex. 2013 May;23(5):1005-13 [PMID: 22510528]
  25. Evol Dev. 2008 Jan-Feb;10(1):1-2 [PMID: 18184351]
  26. J Pers. 1990 Mar;58(1):69-96 [PMID: 23750376]
  27. Arch Sex Behav. 2011 Oct;40(5):865-75 [PMID: 20697937]
  28. Clin Psychol Rev. 2001 Aug;21(6):823-56 [PMID: 11497209]
  29. Anim Behav. 1998 Nov;56(5):1261-1266 [PMID: 9819343]
  30. Anim Reprod Sci. 1998 Dec 31;54(2):109-19 [PMID: 9877057]
  31. Hum Reprod Update. 1998 Sep-Oct;4(5):655-66 [PMID: 10027619]
  32. Twin Res Hum Genet. 2005 Feb;8(1):27-33 [PMID: 15836807]
  33. Am J Physiol. 1951 Jun;165(3):674-9 [PMID: 14846992]
  34. Biol Reprod. 1984 Dec;31(5):888-94 [PMID: 6518230]
  35. Science. 1980 Jun 27;208(4451):1477-9 [PMID: 7384791]
  36. Scand J Psychol. 2003 Jul;44(3):241-50 [PMID: 12914587]
  37. Hum Nat. 1997 Mar;8(1):1-49 [PMID: 26196591]
  38. BJU Int. 2004 Sep;94(4):589-94 [PMID: 15329118]
  39. Horm Behav. 2011 May;59(5):780-92 [PMID: 21195073]
  40. Nat Hist. 1987;96(2):14-21 [PMID: 11622185]
  41. Arch Sex Behav. 2006 Dec;35(6):633-6; author reply 637-9 [PMID: 17109228]
  42. Arch Sex Behav. 1979 Sep;8(5):405-23 [PMID: 496622]
  43. Reprod Domest Anim. 2005 Feb;40(1):1-5 [PMID: 15654993]
  44. Andrologia. 1982 Sep-Oct;14(5):434-9 [PMID: 7149288]
  45. J Psychosom Res. 1981;25(2):119-33 [PMID: 7277273]
  46. J Reprod Fertil. 1971 Mar;24(3):319-36 [PMID: 4926898]
  47. Arch Sex Behav. 2012 Oct;41(5):1127-43 [PMID: 22733154]
  48. Indian J Physiol Pharmacol. 1978 Oct-Dec;22(4):393-6 [PMID: 35465]
  49. Int J Impot Res. 1998 May;10 Suppl 1:S14-21 [PMID: 9669216]
  50. J Sex Marital Ther. 1976 Spring;2(1):40-6 [PMID: 1271479]
  51. Arch Sex Behav. 1995 Aug;24(4):369-82 [PMID: 7661653]

Word Cloud

Created with Highcharts 10.0.0settingspermfemaleorgasmfemalesstudyhomefertilityretentionusingtechniquesizeaspectinfertilityfunctioneasilyusedsmallsampleSD=0effectmethodBACKGROUND:Humanvexedquestionfieldcredibleevidencecrypticchoicemanyhallmarksspeciesinitialgoalproduceproofconceptallowingspecificallyaligninghumanincreasedmammalianlattercase-realmoxytocin-mediatedmechanismsseemsworktermsultimatedifferentialproximaterapidtransportcervicaltentingremainsunresolvedMETHOD:repeatedmeasuresdesigntaughtnaturalParticipantsn=6non-representativeintroductionsperm-simulantcombinedorgasm-producingvibrator/homemassagersuppliedmaterialsRESULTS:flowbacksimulatedmeasuredcansignificantdifferencesimulantM=40817non-orgasmM=33022conditionst5=702p=0001Cohen'sd=397r=089indicatesmediumCONCLUSIONS:allowtestsexualresponselinkedloweredminimaltrainingneedsreplicatedlargerMeasuringbackflowfollowingorgasm:newEvolutionFemaleOrgasmFertilityInsuckSpermRetention

Similar Articles

Cited By