Quality of maize for sale in markets in Benin and Niger.

O N Bakoye, I B Baoua, H Seyni, L Amadou, L L Murdock, D Baributsa
Author Information
  1. O N Bakoye: Institut National de la Recherche Agronomique du Niger (INRAN), BP 240 Maradi, Niger.
  2. I B Baoua: Université de Maradi, BP 465 Maradi, Niger.
  3. H Seyni: Université Abdou Moumouni de Niamey, BP 10662 Niamey, Niger.
  4. L Amadou: Institut National de la Recherche Agronomique du Niger (INRAN), BP 240 Maradi, Niger.
  5. L L Murdock: Department of Entomology, Purdue University, West Lafayette, IN 47907, USA.
  6. D Baributsa: Department of Entomology, Purdue University, West Lafayette, IN 47907, USA.

Abstract

A follow-up study on the quality of maize for sale in West African public markets was carried out in Benin and Niger from August 15-28, 2013. Complementing the earlier study, this present assessment included not only retailers but also wholesalers and maize producers. Samples were evaluated for parameters related to the physical quality of the maize and for aflatoxin contamination. Most maize value chain actors process their offered Grain using traditional methods for threshing, winnowing and drying. maize for sale in the markets surveyed had an average moisture content ranging between 12 and 14%. Non-Grain impurities amounted to 0-2.3% while mouldy grains ranged between 0.2 and 0.8%. The impurity level in Grain was three times higher among wholesalers compared to retailers and producers. An insect pest, the Larger Grain Borer ( (Horn) was found only in Benin but Motschulsky, Stephens, and Herbst, were present in maize for sale in the markets in of both countries. Insect pest frequency was 16 times higher in wholesalers' Grain compared to that of retailers and producers. aflatoxin levels exceeding the accepted standard of 20 ppb were noted in markets in both countries. The highest proportion of aflatoxin-contaminated maize was in wholesalers' Grain in Malanville market.

Keywords

References

  1. Environ Health Perspect. 2005 Dec;113(12):1763-7 [PMID: 16330360]
  2. J Appl Microbiol. 2004;97(2):439-45 [PMID: 15239712]
  3. J Food Prot. 1995 Jan;58(1):86-90 [PMID: 31121770]
  4. J Econ Entomol. 1995 Dec;88(6):1776-82 [PMID: 8537546]
  5. J Econ Entomol. 2000 Aug;93(4):1338-46 [PMID: 10985051]
  6. J Anim Sci. 1992 Dec;70(12):3941-9 [PMID: 1474031]

Word Cloud

Created with Highcharts 10.0.0maizemarketssalegrainBeninretailersproducersstudyqualityNigerpresentwholesalersMaize0timeshighercomparedpestcountriesInsectwholesalers'Aflatoxinfollow-upWestAfricanpubliccarriedAugust15-282013ComplementingearlierassessmentincludedalsoSamplesevaluatedparametersrelatedphysicalaflatoxincontaminationvaluechainactorsprocessofferedusingtraditionalmethodsthreshingwinnowingdryingsurveyedaveragemoisturecontentranging1214%Non-grainimpuritiesamounted0-23%mouldygrainsranged28%impuritylevelthreeamonginsectLargerGrainBorerHornfoundMotschulskyStephensHerbstfrequency16levelsexceedingacceptedstandard20 ppbnotedhighestproportionaflatoxin-contaminatedMalanvillemarketQualityInfestationMarketTrader

Similar Articles

Cited By (3)