Is binding decline the main source of the ageing effect on prospective memory? A ride in a virtual town.

Grégory Lecouvey, Julie Gonneaud, Pascale Piolino, Sophie Madeleine, Eric Orriols, Philippe Fleury, Francis Eustache, Béatrice Desgranges
Author Information
  1. Grégory Lecouvey: Normandie Univ, UNICAEN, PSL Research University, EPHE, INSERM, U1077, CHU de Caen, Neuropsychologie et Imagerie de la Mémoire Humaine, 14000 Caen, France.
  2. Julie Gonneaud: Normandie Univ, UNICAEN, PSL Research University, EPHE, INSERM, U1077, CHU de Caen, Neuropsychologie et Imagerie de la Mémoire Humaine, 14000 Caen, France.
  3. Pascale Piolino: Laboratoire Mémoire et Cognition, Institut de Psychologie & Centre de Psychiatrie et Neurosciences INSERM S894, Université Paris Descartes, Paris, France.
  4. Sophie Madeleine: Normandie Univ, UNICAEN, CIREVE, Caen, France.
  5. Eric Orriols: Laboratoire Mémoire et Cognition, Institut de Psychologie & Centre de Psychiatrie et Neurosciences INSERM S894, Université Paris Descartes, Paris, France.
  6. Philippe Fleury: Normandie Univ, UNICAEN, CIREVE, Caen, France.
  7. Francis Eustache: Normandie Univ, UNICAEN, PSL Research University, EPHE, INSERM, U1077, CHU de Caen, Neuropsychologie et Imagerie de la Mémoire Humaine, 14000 Caen, France.
  8. Béatrice Desgranges: Normandie Univ, UNICAEN, PSL Research University, EPHE, INSERM, U1077, CHU de Caen, Neuropsychologie et Imagerie de la Mémoire Humaine, 14000 Caen, France.

Abstract

: This study was designed to improve our understanding of (PM) changes in ageing, and to identify the cognitive correlates of PM decline, using a virtual environment, to provide a more realistic assessment than traditional laboratory tasks. : Thirty-five young and 29 older individuals exposed to a virtual town were asked to recall three event-based intentions with a strong link between prospective and retrospective components, three event-based intentions with a weak link, and three time-based intentions. They also underwent retrospective episodic memory, executive functions, binding in working memory, processing speed, and time estimation assessments. : Older individuals recalled fewer intentions than young adults. While age-related PM decline affected the recall of both prospective and retrospective components, the recall of the latter seemed more challenging for older individuals when the link was weak. This PM decline was linked to an age-related decline in the binding process in working memory, as well as in processing speed, executive functioning, and episodic memory, depending on the nature of intentions. : PM appears to be sensitive to ageing, even when the device is thought to be ecological. This decline is particularly pronounced when controlled processes are needed.

Keywords

References

  1. J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn. 2000 Sep;26(5):1170-87 [PMID: 11009251]
  2. Memory. 2000 Sep;8(5):311-21 [PMID: 11045239]
  3. Trends Cogn Sci. 2000 Nov 1;4(11):417-423 [PMID: 11058819]
  4. Mem Cognit. 2000 Sep;28(6):1041-9 [PMID: 11105530]
  5. Am J Psychol. 2001 Autumn;114(3):411-23 [PMID: 11641887]
  6. J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn. 2002 Jul;28(4):652-9 [PMID: 12109759]
  7. Z Gerontol Geriatr. 2003 Feb;36(1):35-41 [PMID: 12616406]
  8. J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn. 2003 May;29(3):347-61 [PMID: 12776746]
  9. J Head Trauma Rehabil. 2002 Oct;17(5):378-94 [PMID: 12802250]
  10. Psychophysiology. 2003 Mar;40(2):260-76 [PMID: 12820867]
  11. Brain. 2003 Sep;126(Pt 9):1917-34 [PMID: 12876141]
  12. Psychol Aging. 1992 Sep;7(3):471-8 [PMID: 1388869]
  13. J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn. 2003 Sep;29(5):826-37 [PMID: 14516216]
  14. J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn. 2003 Sep;29(5):861-70 [PMID: 14516219]
  15. J Exp Psychol Gen. 2003 Dec;132(4):566-94 [PMID: 14640849]
  16. Can J Exp Psychol. 2003 Dec;57(4):274-89 [PMID: 14710865]
  17. Brain Inj. 2004 Apr;18(4):391-401 [PMID: 14742152]
  18. Psychol Aging. 2004 Mar;19(1):27-39 [PMID: 15065929]
  19. J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn. 2004 May;30(3):605-14 [PMID: 15099129]
  20. J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn. 2004 Jul;30(4):756-77 [PMID: 15238021]
  21. Brain Cogn. 2005 Feb;57(1):4-7 [PMID: 15629206]
  22. Behav Res Methods Instrum Comput. 2004 Nov;36(4):717-31 [PMID: 15641418]
  23. Mem Cognit. 2004 Oct;32(7):1133-48 [PMID: 15813495]
  24. J Exp Psychol Gen. 2005 Aug;134(3):327-42 [PMID: 16131267]
  25. Acta Psychol (Amst). 2006 May;122(1):58-73 [PMID: 16309619]
  26. Neuropsychologia. 2006;44(12):2508-19 [PMID: 16697428]
  27. J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn. 2006 May;32(3):623-35 [PMID: 16719671]
  28. J Genet Psychol. 2006 Sep;167(3):269-87 [PMID: 17278416]
  29. Neurobiol Aging. 2009 Jan;30(1):112-24 [PMID: 17630048]
  30. Int Psychogeriatr. 2008 Feb;20(1):124-34 [PMID: 17711605]
  31. PLoS One. 2008 Feb 20;3(2):e1568 [PMID: 18286167]
  32. J Gen Psychol. 2008 Jan;135(1):4-22 [PMID: 18318405]
  33. Neuropsychologia. 2008;46(7):1954-64 [PMID: 18329672]
  34. Memory. 2009 Feb;17(2):180-96 [PMID: 18608976]
  35. Behav Res Methods. 2008 Aug;40(3):879-91 [PMID: 18697684]
  36. Neuropsychology. 2009 Mar;23(2):178-88 [PMID: 19254091]
  37. Cyberpsychol Behav. 2009 Aug;12(4):379-85 [PMID: 19591619]
  38. Neuropsychol Rehabil. 2010 Apr;20(2):239-63 [PMID: 19742380]
  39. J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn. 2010 Jan;36(1):190-203 [PMID: 20053054]
  40. Q J Exp Psychol (Hove). 2010 Apr;63(4):646-52 [PMID: 20104392]
  41. Mem Cognit. 2010 Apr;38(3):304-11 [PMID: 20234020]
  42. Hum Psychopharmacol. 2010 Jun-Jul;25(4):318-25 [PMID: 20521322]
  43. Int Psychogeriatr. 2011 May;23(4):583-92 [PMID: 20843394]
  44. PLoS One. 2010 Oct 08;5(10):e13304 [PMID: 20949046]
  45. Dev Psychol. 2010 Nov;46(6):1444-53 [PMID: 21058832]
  46. J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn. 1990 Jul;16(4):717-26 [PMID: 2142956]
  47. Hum Psychopharmacol. 2011 Apr;26(3):208-15 [PMID: 21542026]
  48. J Cogn Neurosci. 2011 Dec;23(12):4138-49 [PMID: 21671732]
  49. Memory. 2011 May;19(4):360-77 [PMID: 21678154]
  50. Q J Exp Psychol (Hove). 2011 Nov;64(11):2181-93 [PMID: 21740113]
  51. Neuropsychol Dev Cogn B Aging Neuropsychol Cogn. 2012;19(1-2):58-83 [PMID: 22112250]
  52. Neuropsychologia. 2012 Apr;50(5):592-602 [PMID: 22261400]
  53. Hum Psychopharmacol. 2012 Mar;27(2):217-25 [PMID: 22389086]
  54. Q J Exp Psychol (Hove). 2013;66(5):895-909 [PMID: 23025821]
  55. Q J Exp Psychol (Hove). 2013;66(5):864-75 [PMID: 23030664]
  56. Dev Psychol. 2013 Aug;49(8):1544-1553 [PMID: 23148933]
  57. Int J Psychol. 2013;48(6):1291-302 [PMID: 23305040]
  58. Hum Brain Mapp. 2014 May;35(5):2448-58 [PMID: 24038539]
  59. Neuropsychologia. 2014 Jul;60:77-83 [PMID: 24892223]
  60. J Huntingtons Dis. 2013;2(3):305-13 [PMID: 25062678]
  61. Front Aging Neurosci. 2014 Dec 17;6:338 [PMID: 25566069]
  62. Memory. 2016;24(4):444-54 [PMID: 25750997]
  63. Front Aging Neurosci. 2015 May 12;7:80 [PMID: 26029101]
  64. Neurobiol Aging. 2015 Aug;36(8):2360-9 [PMID: 26058839]
  65. Memory. 2016 Jul;24(6):812-25 [PMID: 26247302]
  66. Eur J Ageing. 2013 Jun 5;11(1):99-106 [PMID: 28804318]
  67. J Pers Soc Psychol. 1986 Dec;51(6):1173-82 [PMID: 3806354]
  68. Memory. 1993 Mar;1(1):23-41 [PMID: 7584257]
  69. J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn. 1995 Jul;21(4):996-1007 [PMID: 7673871]
  70. Q J Exp Psychol A. 1994 Aug;47(3):565-87 [PMID: 7938668]
  71. Psychol Aging. 1996 Mar;11(1):74-8 [PMID: 8726372]
  72. Mem Cognit. 1996 Jul;24(4):403-16 [PMID: 8757490]
  73. Psychol Rev. 1996 Jul;103(3):403-28 [PMID: 8759042]
  74. Psychol Aging. 1997 Jun;12(2):314-27 [PMID: 9189992]
  75. Psychol Aging. 1997 Sep;12(3):479-88 [PMID: 9308095]
  76. J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn. 1998 Mar;24(2):336-49 [PMID: 9530843]

Word Cloud

Created with Highcharts 10.0.0declinePMintentionsmemory:ageingvirtualindividualsrecallthreelinkprospectiveretrospectiveepisodicexecutivebindingyoungoldertownevent-basedcomponentsweakfunctionsworkingprocessingspeedage-relatedstudydesignedimproveunderstandingchangesidentifycognitivecorrelatesusingenvironmentproviderealisticassessmenttraditionallaboratorytasksThirty-five29exposedaskedstrongtime-basedalsounderwenttimeestimationassessmentsOlderrecalledfeweradultsaffectedlatterseemedchallenginglinkedprocesswellfunctioningdependingnatureappearssensitiveevendevicethoughtecologicalparticularlypronouncedcontrolledprocessesneededmainsourceeffectmemory?rideIntentionshealthyreality

Similar Articles

Cited By (8)