Maxent-directed field surveys identify new populations of narrowly endemic habitat specialists.

Cody M Rhoden, William E Peterman, Christopher A Taylor
Author Information
  1. Cody M Rhoden: Illinois Natural History Survey, University of Illinois Urbana-Champaign, Champaign, IL, United States of America.
  2. William E Peterman: School of Environment and Natural Resources, Ohio State University, Columbus, OH, United States of America.
  3. Christopher A Taylor: Illinois Natural History Survey, University of Illinois Urbana-Champaign, Champaign, IL, United States of America.

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Rare or narrowly endemic organisms are difficult to monitor and conserve when their total distribution and habitat preferences are incompletely known. One method employed in determining distributions of these organisms is species distribution modeling (SDM).
METHODS: Using two species of narrowly endemic burrowing crayfish species as our study organisms, we sought to ground validate Maxent, a commonly used program to conduct SDMs. We used fine scale (30 m) resolution rasters of pertinent habitat variables collected from historical museum records in 2014. We then ground validated the Maxent model in 2015 by randomly and equally sampling the output from the model.
RESULTS: The Maxent models for both species of crayfish showed positive relationships between predicted relative occurrence rate and crayfish burrow abundance in both a Receiver Operating Characteristic and generalized linear model approach. The ground validation of Maxent led us to new populations and range extensions of both species of crayfish.
DISCUSSION: We conclude that Maxent is a suitable tool for the discovery of new populations of narrowly endemic, rare habitat specialists and our technique may be used for other rare, endemic organisms.

Keywords

References

  1. PLoS One. 2014 May 12;9(5):e97122 [PMID: 24818607]
  2. Ecol Appl. 2011 Mar;21(2):335-42 [PMID: 21563566]
  3. PLoS One. 2013;8(2):e55158 [PMID: 23457462]
  4. BMC Bioinformatics. 2011 Mar 17;12:77 [PMID: 21414208]
  5. Ecology. 2012 Mar;93(3):679-88 [PMID: 22624221]
  6. Ecol Lett. 2005 Sep;8(9):993-1009 [PMID: 34517687]
  7. Ann Appl Stat. 2013 Dec 1;7(4):1917-1939 [PMID: 25493106]
  8. PLoS One. 2013;8(3):e59853 [PMID: 23555808]
  9. Zootaxa. 2013;3717:101-57 [PMID: 26176099]
  10. Conserv Biol. 2010 Aug;24(4):1099-110 [PMID: 20337670]

Word Cloud

Created with Highcharts 10.0.0endemicspeciesMaxentmodelnarrowlyorganismshabitatcrayfishdistributiongroundusednewpopulationsscalelinearrarespecialistsBACKGROUND:RaredifficultmonitorconservetotalpreferencesincompletelyknownOnemethodemployeddeterminingdistributionsmodelingSDMMETHODS:UsingtwoburrowingstudysoughtvalidatecommonlyprogramconductSDMsfine30mresolutionrasterspertinentvariablescollectedhistoricalmuseumrecords2014validated2015randomlyequallysamplingoutputRESULTS:modelsshowedpositiverelationshipspredictedrelativeoccurrencerateburrowabundanceReceiverOperatingCharacteristicgeneralizedapproachvalidationledusrangeextensionsDISCUSSION:concludesuitabletooldiscoverytechniquemayMaxent-directedfieldsurveysidentifyArkansasCrayfishFallicambarusharpiFineGeneralizedOuachitamountainsProcambarusreimeriSpeciesZeroinflated

Similar Articles

Cited By