High-intensity exercise interventions in cancer survivors: a systematic review exploring the impact on health outcomes.

Kellie Toohey, Kate Pumpa, Andrew McKune, Julie Cooke, Stuart Semple
Author Information
  1. Kellie Toohey: Discipline of Sport and Exercise Science, Faculty of Health, University of Canberra, University Drive, Bruce, Canberra, ACT, 2617, Australia. kellie.toohey@canberra.edu.au. ORCID
  2. Kate Pumpa: Discipline of Sport and Exercise Science, Faculty of Health, University of Canberra, University Drive, Bruce, Canberra, ACT, 2617, Australia.
  3. Andrew McKune: Discipline of Sport and Exercise Science, Faculty of Health, University of Canberra, University Drive, Bruce, Canberra, ACT, 2617, Australia.
  4. Julie Cooke: Discipline of Sport and Exercise Science, Faculty of Health, University of Canberra, University Drive, Bruce, Canberra, ACT, 2617, Australia.
  5. Stuart Semple: Discipline of Sport and Exercise Science, Faculty of Health, University of Canberra, University Drive, Bruce, Canberra, ACT, 2617, Australia.

Abstract

PURPOSE: There is an increasing body of evidence underpinning high-intensity exercise as an effective and time-efficient intervention for improving health in cancer survivors. The aim of this study was to, (1) evaluate the efficacy and (2) the safety of high-intensity exercise interventions in improving selected health outcomes in cancer survivors.
METHODS: Design Systematic review. Data sources Google Scholar and EBSCO, CINAHL Plus, Computers and Applied Sciences Complete, Health Source-Consumer Edition, Health Source: Nursing/Academic Edition, MEDLINE, Web of Science and SPORTDiscuss from inception up until August 2017. Eligibility criteria Randomized controlled trials of high-intensity exercise interventions in cancer survivors (all cancer types) with health-related outcome measures. The guidelines adopted for this review were the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analysis (PRISMA).
RESULTS: The search returned 447 articles, of which nine articles (n���=���531 participants mean, age 58��������9.5 years) met the eligibility criteria. Exercise interventions of between 4 and 18 weeks consisting of high-intensity interval bouts of up to 4-min were compared with a continuous moderate intensity (CMIT) intervention or a control group. High-intensity exercise interventions elicited significant improvements in VO max, strength, body mass, body fat and hip and waist circumference compared with CMIT and/or control groups. The studies reviewed showed low risk in participating in supervised high-intensity exercise interventions. Mixed mode high-intensity interventions which included both aerobic and resistance exercises were most effective improving the aerobic fitness levels of cancer survivors by 12.45-21.35%, from baseline to post-intervention.
CONCLUSION: High-intensity exercise interventions improved physical and physiological health-related outcome measures such as cardiovascular fitness and strength in cancer survivors. Given that high-intensity exercise sessions require a shorter time commitment, it may be a useful modality to improve health outcomes in those who are time poor. The risk of adverse events associated with high-intensity exercise was low.

Keywords

MeSH Term

Cancer Survivors
Exercise Therapy
Humans
Neoplasms
Prognosis

Word Cloud

Created with Highcharts 10.0.0exercisehigh-intensityinterventionscancersurvivorshealthHigh-intensitybodyimprovingoutcomesreviewHealtheffectiveinterventionSystematicEditioncriteriahealth-relatedoutcomemeasuresarticlesExercisecomparedCMITcontrolstrengthlowriskaerobicfitnesstimePURPOSE:increasingevidenceunderpinningtime-efficientaimstudy1evaluateefficacy2safetyselectedMETHODS:DesignDatasourcesGoogleScholarEBSCOCINAHLPlusComputersAppliedSciencesCompleteSource-ConsumerSource:Nursing/AcademicMEDLINEWebScienceSPORTDiscussinceptionAugust2017EligibilityRandomizedcontrolledtrialstypesguidelinesadoptedPreferredReportingItemsReviewsMeta-AnalysisPRISMARESULTS:searchreturned447ninen���=���531participantsmeanage58��������95 yearsmeteligibility418weeksconsistingintervalbouts4-mincontinuousmoderateintensitygroupelicitedsignificantimprovementsVOmaxmassfathipwaistcircumferenceand/orgroupsstudiesreviewedshowedparticipatingsupervisedMixedmodeincludedresistanceexerciseslevels1245-2135%baselinepost-interventionCONCLUSION:improvedphysicalphysiologicalcardiovascularGivensessionsrequireshortercommitmentmayusefulmodalityimprovepooradverseeventsassociatedsurvivors:systematicexploringimpactOncologyPhysicalactivitySafety

Similar Articles

Cited By