Immigrant Bilingualism in Spain: An Asset or a Liability?

Maria Medvedeva, Alejandro Portes
Author Information
  1. Maria Medvedeva: Princeton University, Princeton Writing Program, Baker Hall, Princeton, New Jersey, United States.
  2. Alejandro Portes: Princeton University, Department of Sociology, Princeton, New Jersey, United States.

Abstract

This study contributes to the ongoing debate about bilingual advantage and examines whether bilingual immigrant youths fare better, as well as, or worse academically than the matching group of monolinguals. Using data from Spain, where close to half of immigrants speak Spanish as their native language, we found no evidence of costs of bilingualism: bilingual youths did benefit from their linguistic skills. Their advantage, however, manifested itself not uniformly across discrete outcomes, but in a direct trajectory toward higher educational attainment. Bilingualism neutralized the possible negative effect of ethnic origins and extended the positive effect of high parental ambition. Implications for theory and practice are discussed.

References

  1. Int Migr Rev. 1998 Winter;32(4):877-900 [PMID: 12294300]
  2. Future Child. 2011 Spring;21(1):219-46 [PMID: 21465862]
  3. Can J Exp Psychol. 2011 Dec;65(4):229-35 [PMID: 21910523]
  4. Int Migr Rev. 2010 Winter;44(4):767-801 [PMID: 22904591]

Grants

  1. P2C HD047879/NICHD NIH HHS

Word Cloud

Created with Highcharts 10.0.0bilingualadvantageyouthsBilingualismeffectstudycontributesongoingdebateexamineswhetherimmigrantfarebetterwellworseacademicallymatchinggroupmonolingualsUsingdataSpainclosehalfimmigrantsspeakSpanishnativelanguagefoundevidencecostsbilingualism:benefitlinguisticskillshowevermanifesteduniformlyacrossdiscreteoutcomesdirecttrajectorytowardhighereducationalattainmentneutralizedpossiblenegativeethnicoriginsextendedpositivehighparentalambitionImplicationstheorypracticediscussedImmigrantSpain:AssetLiability?

Similar Articles

Cited By