Added Sugar Intake among Pregnant Women in the United States: National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey 2003-2012.

Catherine E Cioffi, Janet Figueroa, Jean A Welsh
Author Information

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Despite associations of dietary added sugar with excess weight gain and chronic disease risk, intake among most Americans exceeds the recommended limits (<10% total energy). Maternal diet plays an important role in pregnancy-related outcomes, but little is known about the extent of added sugar intake during pregnancy.
OBJECTIVE: To assess intake and identify the top sources of added sugars in the diets of pregnant vs nonpregnant women in the United States.
DESIGN: Cross-sectional analysis of data from the National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey (NHANES), 2003-2004 to 2011-2012.
PARTICIPANTS: Four thousand one hundred seventy-nine pregnant and nonpregnant women (aged 20 to 39 years) who completed a dietary recall.
STATISTICAL ANALYSES PERFORMED: Survey-weighted analyses were used to estimate means (95% CIs) in total grams and as percentage of total energy for added sugar intake by pregnancy status and by demographic subgroup and to identify leading sources of added sugar.
RESULTS: Added sugar intake trended toward being higher in pregnant compared with nonpregnant women in absolute grams, 85.1 g (95% CI: 77.4 to 92.7) vs 76.7 g (95% CI: 73.6 to 79.9), respectively (P=0.06), but was lower among pregnant women when total energy intake was accounted for, 14.8% (95% CI: 13.8 to 15.7) vs 15.9% (95% CI: 15.2 to 16.6) of total energy, respectively (P=0.03). Among pregnant women, added sugar intake was similar among demographic subgroups. However, in multivariable regression, pregnancy status significantly modified the associations of education and income with added sugar intake, whereby less educated and lower-income women who were pregnant had lower added sugar intakes compared with those who were not pregnant, but more educated or higher-income women did not exhibit this pattern. The top five sources of added sugar for all women were sugar-sweetened beverages; cakes, cookies, and pastries; sugars and sweets; juice drinks and smoothies; and milk-based desserts.
CONCLUSIONS: Although pregnant women had higher energy intakes, this was not attributed to higher intakes of added sugar. Although education and income affected consumption during pregnancy, intake of added sugar among all women, regardless of pregnancy status, exceeded recommendations.

Keywords

References

  1. Lancet Diabetes Endocrinol. 2016 Feb;4(2):174-86 [PMID: 26654575]
  2. BMJ Open. 2015 Feb 10;5(2):e005839 [PMID: 25670731]
  3. BJOG. 2014 Jan;121(1):72-81; discussion 82 [PMID: 24102880]
  4. NCHS Data Brief. 2013 May;(122):1-8 [PMID: 23742909]
  5. BMJ. 1995 Oct 14;311(7011):986-9 [PMID: 7580640]
  6. PLoS One. 2015 Jul 20;10(7):e0133041 [PMID: 26192183]
  7. Obstet Gynecol. 2007 Feb;109(2 Pt 1):419-33 [PMID: 17267845]
  8. Circulation. 2009 Sep 15;120(11):1011-20 [PMID: 19704096]
  9. JAMA. 2016 Mar 15;315(11):1129-40 [PMID: 26978208]
  10. Matern Child Health J. 2012 Dec;16(9):1837-43 [PMID: 22160656]
  11. Clin Endocrinol (Oxf). 2013 Jan;78(1):9-16 [PMID: 23009645]
  12. Am J Clin Nutr. 2015 Dec;102(6):1475-81 [PMID: 26561621]
  13. Nutrients. 2016 Mar 11;8(3):162 [PMID: 26978398]
  14. Obstet Gynecol. 2010 Mar;115(3):597-604 [PMID: 20177292]
  15. Matern Child Health J. 2016 Nov;20(11):2348-2356 [PMID: 27406151]
  16. Diabetes Metab Syndr Obes. 2015 Jun 29;8:295-302 [PMID: 26170704]
  17. Curr Opin Endocrinol Diabetes Obes. 2014 Aug;21(4):257-63 [PMID: 24937039]
  18. J Acad Nutr Diet. 2014 Jul;114(7):1099-1103 [PMID: 24956993]
  19. J Am Diet Assoc. 2006 Oct;106(10):1640-50 [PMID: 17000197]
  20. Obes Rev. 2014 Apr;15(4):338-47 [PMID: 24321007]
  21. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2009 Jul;201(1):61.e1-7 [PMID: 19371858]
  22. Matern Child Health J. 2016 Dec;20(12):2527-2538 [PMID: 27456307]
  23. Int J Gynaecol Obstet. 2011 Nov;115 Suppl 1:S6-10 [PMID: 22099446]
  24. Lancet. 2013 Aug 3;382(9890):427-451 [PMID: 23746772]
  25. BMJ. 2012 Jan 15;346:e7492 [PMID: 23321486]
  26. Paediatr Perinat Epidemiol. 2013 Nov;27(6):521-31 [PMID: 24117964]
  27. Am J Public Health. 2007 Apr;97(4):667-75 [PMID: 17329656]
  28. J Acad Nutr Diet. 2013 Sep;113(9):1175-81 [PMID: 23871106]

Grants

  1. T32 DK007734/NIDDK NIH HHS

MeSH Term

Adult
Cross-Sectional Studies
Diet
Diet Surveys
Dietary Sugars
Eating
Female
Humans
Nutrition Surveys
Pregnancy
Recommended Dietary Allowances
United States
Young Adult

Chemicals

Dietary Sugars

Word Cloud

Created with Highcharts 10.0.0sugaraddedwomenintakepregnantamongtotalenergypregnancy95%CI:intakessourcesvsnonpregnantstatusAddedhigher715associationsdietaryweightgainidentifytopsugarsUnitedNationalHealthNutritionExaminationSurveygramsdemographiccomparedg6respectivelyP=0lowereducationincomeeducatedAlthoughBACKGROUND:DespiteexcesschronicdiseaseriskAmericansexceedsrecommendedlimits<10%Maternaldietplaysimportantrolepregnancy-relatedoutcomeslittleknownextentOBJECTIVE:assessdietsStatesDESIGN:Cross-sectionalanalysisdataNHANES2003-20042011-2012PARTICIPANTS:Fourthousandonehundredseventy-nineaged2039yearscompletedrecallSTATISTICALANALYSESPERFORMED:Survey-weightedanalysesusedestimatemeansCIspercentagesubgroupleadingRESULTS:trendedtowardabsolute85177492767379906accounted148%1389%21603AmongsimilarsubgroupsHowevermultivariableregressionsignificantlymodifiedwherebylesslower-incomehigher-incomeexhibitpatternfivesugar-sweetenedbeveragescakescookiespastriessweetsjuicedrinkssmoothiesmilk-baseddessertsCONCLUSIONS:attributedaffectedconsumptionregardlessexceededrecommendationsSugarIntakePregnantWomenStates:2003-2012CarbohydratesDietaryGestationalPregnancy

Similar Articles

Cited By