Cost-Effectiveness of Statin Plus Eicosapentaenoic Acid Combination Therapy for Cardiovascular Disease Prevention in Japanese Patients With Hypercholesterolemia - An Analysis Based on the Japan Eicosapentaenoic Acid Lipid Intervention Study (JELIS).

Satoshi Kodera, Hiroyuki Morita, Arihiro Kiyosue, Jiro Ando, Issei Komuro
Author Information
  1. Satoshi Kodera: Department of Cardiovascular Medicine, Graduate School of Medicine, The University of Tokyo.
  2. Hiroyuki Morita: Department of Cardiovascular Medicine, Graduate School of Medicine, The University of Tokyo.
  3. Arihiro Kiyosue: Department of Cardiovascular Medicine, Graduate School of Medicine, The University of Tokyo.
  4. Jiro Ando: Department of Cardiovascular Medicine, Graduate School of Medicine, The University of Tokyo.
  5. Issei Komuro: Department of Cardiovascular Medicine, Graduate School of Medicine, The University of Tokyo.

Abstract

BACKGROUND: The addition of eicosapentaenoic acid (EPA) to statin therapy has been shown to reduce cardiovascular events. This study examined the cost-effectiveness of EPA plus statin (EPA+statin) combination therapy compared with statin monotherapy for primary and secondary prevention of cardiovascular disease (CVD) in Japan.
METHODS AND RESULTS: A Markov model was applied to assess the costs and benefits associated with EPA+statin combination therapy over a projected 30-year period from the perspective of a public healthcare funder in Japan. The incremental cost-effectiveness ratio (ICER), expressed as quality-adjusted life-years (QALY), was estimated for primary prevention and secondary prevention of CVD in patients with hypercholesterolemia. Impact on survival and number of events were based on the Japan EPA Lipid Intervention Study. Sensitivity analyses examined the influence of various input parameters on costs and outcomes of treatment. ICER was ¥29.6 million per QALY gained in primary prevention and ¥5.5 million per QALY gained in secondary prevention. The probabilities that EPA+statin combination therapy would be cost-effective compared with statin monotherapy were 39% in primary prevention and 49% in secondary prevention at a cost-effectiveness threshold of ¥5 million per QALY gained. Sensitivity analyses showed that EPA was cost-effective in secondary prevention.
CONCLUSIONS: EPA+statin combination therapy showed acceptable cost-effectiveness for secondary prevention, but not primary prevention, of CVD in patients with hypercholesterolemia in Japan.

Keywords

MeSH Term

Cardiovascular Diseases
Cost-Benefit Analysis
Drug Therapy, Combination
Eicosapentaenoic Acid
Female
Humans
Hydroxymethylglutaryl-CoA Reductase Inhibitors
Hypercholesterolemia
Japan
Male
Primary Prevention
Quality-Adjusted Life Years
Secondary Prevention

Chemicals

Hydroxymethylglutaryl-CoA Reductase Inhibitors
Eicosapentaenoic Acid

Word Cloud

Created with Highcharts 10.0.0preventionsecondarytherapycost-effectivenessprimaryJapanEPAstatinEPA+statincombinationQALYdiseaseCVDmillionpergainedEicosapentaenoicacidcardiovasculareventsexaminedcomparedmonotherapycostsratioICERpatientshypercholesterolemiaLipidInterventionStudySensitivityanalyses¥5cost-effectiveshowedAcidCardiovascularBACKGROUND:additioneicosapentaenoicshownreducestudyplusMETHODS AND RESULTS:Markovmodelappliedassessbenefitsassociatedprojected30-yearperiodperspectivepublichealthcarefunderincrementalexpressedquality-adjustedlife-yearsestimatedImpactsurvivalnumberbasedinfluencevariousinputparametersoutcomestreatment¥2965probabilities39%49%thresholdCONCLUSIONS:acceptableCost-EffectivenessStatinPlusCombinationTherapyDiseasePreventionJapanesePatientsHypercholesterolemia -AnalysisBasedJELISCoronaryarteryHypercholesterolemiaIncremental

Similar Articles

Cited By (9)