Letter to the editor: On plurality and authorship in science.

Bor Luen Tang
Author Information
  1. Bor Luen Tang: a NUS Graduate School for Integrative Sciences and Engineering , National University of Singapore , Singapore. ORCID

Abstract

Moffatt argues that the "plurality of distinct accounts of scientific authorship" necessitates caution in attempts to identify unethical authorship practices, and urges that considerations be given to establishing a "single consensus account of authorship." The revised International Committee of Medical Journal Editors (ICMJE) criteria do capture the essential features of authorship in terms of "intellectual contribution" and "responsibility and accountability," which would clearly demarcate academically legitimate authorship from the common misdemeanors of ghost writing and honorary authorship. However, plurality in the practice of science and credit-sharing culture at the ground would likely render universal adoption or compliance of a single consensus account of authorship untenable.

Keywords

MeSH Term

Authorship
Cultural Diversity
Publishing
Social Responsibility
Writing

Word Cloud

Created with Highcharts 10.0.0authorshipconsensusaccount"InternationalCommitteeMedicalJournalEditorsICMJEhonorarypluralityscienceMoffattargues"pluralitydistinctaccountsscientificauthorship"necessitatescautionattemptsidentifyunethicalpracticesurgesconsiderationsgivenestablishing"singlerevisedcriteriacaptureessentialfeaturesterms"intellectualcontribution""responsibilityaccountabilityclearlydemarcateacademicallylegitimatecommonmisdemeanorsghostwritingHoweverpracticecredit-sharingculturegroundlikelyrenderuniversaladoptioncompliancesingleuntenableLettereditor:Authorshipresearchethics

Similar Articles

Cited By (2)