Focusing on cancer patients' intentions to use psychooncological support: A longitudinal, mixed-methods study.

T Tondorf, A Grossert, S I Rothschild, M T Koller, C Rochlitz, A Kiss, R Schaefert, G Meinlschmidt, S Hunziker, D Zwahlen
Author Information
  1. T Tondorf: Department of Psychosomatic Medicine, University Hospital Basel, Basel, Switzerland. ORCID
  2. A Grossert: Department of Psychosomatic Medicine, University Hospital Basel, Basel, Switzerland.
  3. S I Rothschild: Department Medical Oncology, University Hospital Basel, Basel, Switzerland.
  4. M T Koller: Swiss Transplant Cohort Study (STCS), University Hospital Basel, Basel, Switzerland.
  5. C Rochlitz: Department Medical Oncology, University Hospital Basel, Basel, Switzerland.
  6. A Kiss: Department of Psychosomatic Medicine, University Hospital Basel, Basel, Switzerland.
  7. R Schaefert: Department of Psychosomatic Medicine, University Hospital Basel, Basel, Switzerland.
  8. G Meinlschmidt: Department of Psychosomatic Medicine, University Hospital Basel, Basel, Switzerland. ORCID
  9. S Hunziker: Department of Psychosomatic Medicine, University Hospital Basel, Basel, Switzerland.
  10. D Zwahlen: Department of Psychosomatic Medicine, University Hospital Basel, Basel, Switzerland. ORCID

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: Distress screening programs aim to ensure appropriate psychooncological support for cancer patients, but many eligible patients do not use these services. To improve distress management, we need to better understand patients' supportive care needs. In this paper, we report the first key finding from a longitudinal study that focused on patients' intentions to use psychooncological support and its association with distress and uptake of the psychooncology service.
METHODS: We conducted a prospective, observational study in an Oncology Outpatient Clinic and assessed distress, intention to use psychooncological support, and uptake of the psychooncology service by using the Distress Thermometer, a semistructured interview, and hospital records. We analyzed data with a mixed-methods approach.
RESULTS: Of 333 patients (mean age 61 years; 55% male; 54% Distress Thermometer ≥ 5), 25% intended to use the psychooncology service (yes), 33% were ambivalent (maybe), and 42% reported no intention (no). Overall, 23% had attended the psychooncology service 4 months later. Ambivalent patients reported higher distress than patients with no intention (odds ratio = 1.18, 95% confidence interval [1.06-1.32]) but showed significantly lower uptake behavior than patients with an intention (odds ratio = 14.04, 95% confidence interval [6.74-29.24]). Qualitative analyses revealed that ambivalent patients (maybe) emphasized fears and uncertainties, while patients with clear intentions (yes/no) emphasized knowledge, attitudes, and coping concepts.
CONCLUSIONS: We identified a vulnerable group of ambivalent patients with high distress levels and low uptake behavior. To optimize distress screening programs, we suggest addressing and discussing patients' supportive care needs in routine clinical practice.

Keywords

References

  1. Support Care Cancer. 2010 Sep;18(9):1147-56 [PMID: 19727843]
  2. J Clin Oncol. 2007 Oct 10;25(29):4670-81 [PMID: 17846453]
  3. Res Nurs Health. 2000 Aug;23(4):334-40 [PMID: 10940958]
  4. Psychooncology. 2018 Jun;27(6):1656-1663 [PMID: 29656415]
  5. Psychooncology. 2010 Jul;19(7):718-25 [PMID: 19673010]
  6. Arch Intern Med. 2000 Jul 24;160(14):2101-7 [PMID: 10904452]
  7. Br J Cancer. 2004 Jun 14;90(12):2297-304 [PMID: 15162149]
  8. Psychooncology. 2015 Dec;24(12):1784-91 [PMID: 26042392]
  9. Psychooncology. 2016 Nov;25(11):1363-1370 [PMID: 26804486]
  10. Psychooncology. 2017 Apr;26(4):537-543 [PMID: 27327213]
  11. J Clin Oncol. 2013 Feb 20;31(6):782-93 [PMID: 23319686]
  12. Biochem Med (Zagreb). 2012;22(3):276-82 [PMID: 23092060]
  13. BMC Cancer. 2017 May 30;17(1):385 [PMID: 28558713]
  14. Lancet Psychiatry. 2014 Oct;1(5):320-1 [PMID: 26360982]
  15. J Psychosom Res. 2016 Feb;81:24-30 [PMID: 26800635]
  16. Cancer. 2008 Aug 15;113(4):870-8 [PMID: 18618581]
  17. J Clin Oncol. 2014 Nov 1;32(31):3540-6 [PMID: 25287821]
  18. Psychooncology. 2014 Jun;23(6):601-12 [PMID: 24519814]
  19. Psychooncology. 2010 Mar;19(3):248-54 [PMID: 19382116]
  20. Support Care Cancer. 2008 Mar;16(3):251-9 [PMID: 17602245]
  21. Psychooncology. 2011 Jun;20(6):655-63 [PMID: 21381148]
  22. J Clin Oncol. 2002 Jul 15;20(14):3137-48 [PMID: 12118028]
  23. Psychooncology. 2016 Aug;25(8):882-90 [PMID: 26893285]
  24. Acta Oncol. 2017 Jul;56(7):1026-1029 [PMID: 28145789]
  25. Psychooncology. 2010 Dec;19(12):1294-302 [PMID: 20148442]
  26. Psychooncology. 2004 Dec;13(12):893-7 [PMID: 15457540]
  27. Psychooncology. 2011 May;20(5):525-31 [PMID: 20878852]
  28. J Clin Oncol. 2012 Apr 10;30(11):1160-77 [PMID: 22412146]
  29. Ann Oncol. 2010 May;21(5):925-30 [PMID: 19887467]
  30. Psychooncology. 2015 Mar;24(3):262-8 [PMID: 25082459]
  31. Lancet Oncol. 2011 Feb;12(2):160-74 [PMID: 21251875]
  32. J Natl Compr Canc Netw. 2019 Oct 1;17(10):1229-1249 [PMID: 31590149]
  33. Psychooncology. 2008 Oct;17(10):997-1005 [PMID: 18203243]
  34. Psychooncology. 2015 Jul;24(7):812-8 [PMID: 25504987]

MeSH Term

Adaptation, Psychological
Adult
Aged
Counseling
Female
Humans
Intention
Longitudinal Studies
Male
Middle Aged
Neoplasms
Patient Acceptance of Health Care
Prospective Studies
Psycho-Oncology
Quality of Life
Social Support

Word Cloud

Created with Highcharts 10.0.0patientsdistressuseuptakepsychooncologyDistresspsychooncologicalsupportpatients'serviceintentionscreeningcancerneedsstudyintentionsambivalentprogramssupportivecarelongitudinalThermometermixed-methodsmaybereportedodds95%confidenceintervalbehavioremphasizedOBJECTIVE:aimensureappropriatemanyeligibleservicesimprovemanagementneedbetterunderstandpaperreportfirstkeyfindingfocusedassociationMETHODS:conductedprospectiveobservationalOncologyOutpatientClinicassessedusingsemistructuredinterviewhospitalrecordsanalyzeddataapproachRESULTS:333meanage61 years55%male54%Thermometer ≥ 525%intendedyes33%42%Overall23%attended4 monthslaterAmbivalenthigherratio = 118[106-132]showedsignificantlylowerratio = 1404[674-2924]Qualitativeanalysesrevealedfearsuncertaintiesclearyes/noknowledgeattitudescopingconceptsCONCLUSIONS:identifiedvulnerablegrouphighlevelslowoptimizesuggestaddressingdiscussingroutineclinicalpracticeFocusingsupport:health-caredeliveryoncologypsychologicalreasons

Similar Articles

Cited By