Pelvic Organ Prolapse Repair with Mesh: Mid-Term Efficacy and Complications.

Laura Mateu Arrom, Carlos Errando Smet, Cristina Gutierrez Ruiz, Pedro Araño, Joan Palou Redorta
Author Information
  1. Laura Mateu Arrom: Department of Female and Functional Urology, Fundació Puigvert, Barcelona, Spain.
  2. Carlos Errando Smet: Department of Female and Functional Urology, Fundació Puigvert, Barcelona, Spain.
  3. Cristina Gutierrez Ruiz: Department of Female and Functional Urology, Fundació Puigvert, Barcelona, Spain.
  4. Pedro Araño: Department of Female and Functional Urology, Fundació Puigvert, Barcelona, Spain.
  5. Joan Palou Redorta: Chairman, Department of Urology, Fundació Puigvert, Barcelona, Spain.

Abstract

INTRODUCTION: Our aim was to assess the efficacy and complications of pelvic organ prolapse (POP) correction with transvaginal mesh (TVM).
MATERIALS AND METHODS: We retrospectively assessed patients who had undergone a repair of an apical (primary or recurrent) or recurrent POP using TVM in our department since 2007. Meshes used were Prolift®, Elevate®, and Surelift®. Satisfaction with surgery was assessed on a 0-10 scale.
RESULTS: A total of 83 patients were included (33 Prolift®, 36 Elevate®, 14 Surelift®), with a mean age of 67.8 ± 9.7 years. Eighteen (21.6%) patients underwent a recurrent POP correction. Follow-up was 49 ± 34 months. Twelve (14.4%) symptomatic recurrences were identified, 3 of which required further surgery. Satisfaction was 8.7. Four (4.8%) vaginal exposures were detected, 2 of which required partial mesh removal. Three (3.6%) cases of dyspareunia and 1 (1.2%) case of mild pelvic pain were reported, which did not require further treatment.
CONCLUSION: The use of TVM for apical or recurrent POP repair is effective and is associated with a high satisfaction rate while complications are infrequent.

Keywords

MeSH Term

Aged
Female
Humans
Middle Aged
Patient Satisfaction
Pelvic Organ Prolapse
Postoperative Complications
Recovery of Function
Recurrence
Retrospective Studies
Suburethral Slings
Surgical Mesh
Time Factors
Treatment Outcome
Urologic Surgical Procedures

Word Cloud

Created with Highcharts 10.0.0POPrecurrentTVMpatientsPelviccomplicationspelvicorganprolapsecorrectionmeshassessedrepairapicalProlift®Elevate®Surelift®Satisfactionsurgery148±76%3requiredProlapseINTRODUCTION:aimassessefficacytransvaginalMATERIALSANDMETHODS:retrospectivelyundergoneprimaryusingdepartmentsince2007Meshesused0-10scaleRESULTS:total83included3336meanage679yearsEighteen21underwentFollow-up4934monthsTwelve4%symptomaticrecurrencesidentifiedFour48%vaginalexposuresdetected2partialremovalThreecasesdyspareunia12%casemildpainreportedrequiretreatmentCONCLUSION:useeffectiveassociatedhighsatisfactionrateinfrequentOrganRepairMesh:Mid-TermEfficacyComplicationsComplicationMeshexposurefloordysfunctionfemalerecurrence

Similar Articles

Cited By