Chromosomal abnormalities and copy number variations in fetal ventricular septal defects.

Meiying Cai, Hailong Huang, Linjuan Su, Na Lin, Xiaoqing Wu, Xiaorui Xie, Gang An, Ying Li, Yuan Lin, Liangpu Xu, Hua Cao
Author Information
  1. Meiying Cai: Department of the Prenatal Diagnosis Center, Fujian Provincial Maternity and Children's Hospital, affiliated hospital of Fujian Medical University, Fujian Key Laboratory for Prenatal Diagnosis and Birth Defect, Fuzhou, China.
  2. Hailong Huang: Department of the Prenatal Diagnosis Center, Fujian Provincial Maternity and Children's Hospital, affiliated hospital of Fujian Medical University, Fujian Key Laboratory for Prenatal Diagnosis and Birth Defect, Fuzhou, China.
  3. Linjuan Su: Department of the Prenatal Diagnosis Center, Fujian Provincial Maternity and Children's Hospital, affiliated hospital of Fujian Medical University, Fujian Key Laboratory for Prenatal Diagnosis and Birth Defect, Fuzhou, China.
  4. Na Lin: Department of the Prenatal Diagnosis Center, Fujian Provincial Maternity and Children's Hospital, affiliated hospital of Fujian Medical University, Fujian Key Laboratory for Prenatal Diagnosis and Birth Defect, Fuzhou, China.
  5. Xiaoqing Wu: Department of the Prenatal Diagnosis Center, Fujian Provincial Maternity and Children's Hospital, affiliated hospital of Fujian Medical University, Fujian Key Laboratory for Prenatal Diagnosis and Birth Defect, Fuzhou, China.
  6. Xiaorui Xie: Department of the Prenatal Diagnosis Center, Fujian Provincial Maternity and Children's Hospital, affiliated hospital of Fujian Medical University, Fujian Key Laboratory for Prenatal Diagnosis and Birth Defect, Fuzhou, China.
  7. Gang An: Department of the Prenatal Diagnosis Center, Fujian Provincial Maternity and Children's Hospital, affiliated hospital of Fujian Medical University, Fujian Key Laboratory for Prenatal Diagnosis and Birth Defect, Fuzhou, China.
  8. Ying Li: Department of the Prenatal Diagnosis Center, Fujian Provincial Maternity and Children's Hospital, affiliated hospital of Fujian Medical University, Fujian Key Laboratory for Prenatal Diagnosis and Birth Defect, Fuzhou, China.
  9. Yuan Lin: Department of the Prenatal Diagnosis Center, Fujian Provincial Maternity and Children's Hospital, affiliated hospital of Fujian Medical University, Fujian Key Laboratory for Prenatal Diagnosis and Birth Defect, Fuzhou, China.
  10. Liangpu Xu: Department of the Prenatal Diagnosis Center, Fujian Provincial Maternity and Children's Hospital, affiliated hospital of Fujian Medical University, Fujian Key Laboratory for Prenatal Diagnosis and Birth Defect, Fuzhou, China.
  11. Hua Cao: Department of the Prenatal Diagnosis Center, Fujian Provincial Maternity and Children's Hospital, affiliated hospital of Fujian Medical University, Fujian Key Laboratory for Prenatal Diagnosis and Birth Defect, Fuzhou, China.

Abstract

BACKGROUND: This study aimed to evaluate the applicability of chromosomal microarray analysis (CMA), rather than traditional chromosome analysis, in prenatal diagnosis of ventricular septal defects (VSDs) for superior prenatal genetic counseling and to reveal a potential correlation between submicroscopic chromosomal aberrations and VSDs.
RESULTS: Among the 151 VSD cases, 79 (52.3%) had isolated defects and 72 (47.7%) had additional ultrasound anomalies. Karyotype analysis identified 16 chromosomal abnormalities. Besides the 14 cases of chromosome abnormalities consistent with karyotype analysis, CMA identified an additional 20 cases (13.2%) of abnormal copy number variations (CNVs), of which 13 were pathogenetic CNVs, 5 were variations of uncertain clinical significance (VOUS) and 2 were benign CNVs. The detection rate of pathogenic CNVs in non-isolated-VSDs was significantly higher than that in isolated-VSDs (36.1% (26/72) vs. 1.3% (1/79),  = 0.001). We also found that CMA results indicating pathogenic abnormalities affected the rate of pregnancy termination.
CONCLUSIONS: This study showed that CMA combined with cytogenetic analysis is particularly effective in identifying CNVs in fetuses with VSDs and can have an effect on obstetrical outcomes. The elucidation of the etiology of VSDs suggested that gene mutations or other factors may be implicated.

Keywords

References

  1. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2009 May;33(5):552-9 [PMID: 19350566]
  2. Obstet Gynecol. 2014 Jul;124(1):83-90 [PMID: 24901266]
  3. PLoS Genet. 2012 Sep;8(9):e1002903 [PMID: 22969434]
  4. NPJ Genom Med. 2016 Sep 14;1:16031 [PMID: 28706735]
  5. Eur Heart J. 2007 Nov;28(22):2778-84 [PMID: 17384091]
  6. Am J Hum Genet. 2007 Apr;80(4):633-49 [PMID: 17357070]
  7. Prenat Diagn. 2014 Sep;34(9):858-63 [PMID: 24718970]
  8. N Engl J Med. 2012 Dec 6;367(23):2175-84 [PMID: 23215555]
  9. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2013 Apr;41(4):375-82 [PMID: 23233332]
  10. Prenat Diagn. 2016 Dec;36(13):1185-1191 [PMID: 27794172]
  11. Nat Genet. 1999 Oct;23(2):185-8 [PMID: 10508514]
  12. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2006 Mar;27(3):266-73 [PMID: 16485323]
  13. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2014 Jul;44(1):76-81 [PMID: 24357326]
  14. Clin Perinatol. 2005 Dec;32(4):963-78, ix-x [PMID: 16325672]
  15. J Pediatr. 1989 Jan;114(1):79-86 [PMID: 2521249]
  16. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2000 Aug;16(2):118-22 [PMID: 11117079]
  17. BMC Genomics. 2014 Dec 17;15:1127 [PMID: 25516202]
  18. Eur J Med Genet. 2012 Jan;55(1):12-6 [PMID: 22067610]
  19. Ther Clin Risk Manag. 2017 Oct 04;13:1303-1307 [PMID: 29042787]
  20. Eur J Hum Genet. 2012 Feb;20(2):161-5 [PMID: 21934709]
  21. World J Pediatr Congenit Heart Surg. 2013 Jan;4(1):53-7 [PMID: 23799755]
  22. BMC Med Genomics. 2016 Jan 08;9:2 [PMID: 26742958]
  23. Genomics. 1999 Apr 15;57(2):306-9 [PMID: 10198173]
  24. Prenat Diagn. 2002 Jul;22(7):545-52 [PMID: 12124685]
  25. Cold Spring Harb Perspect Biol. 2013 Aug 01;5(8):a017780 [PMID: 23906716]
  26. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2014 Apr;43(4):404-12 [PMID: 24323407]
  27. Prenat Diagn. 2016 Apr;36(4):321-7 [PMID: 26833920]
  28. Prenat Diagn. 2016 Dec;36(13):1178-1184 [PMID: 27794163]

Word Cloud

Created with Highcharts 10.0.0analysisCNVsCMAdefectsVSDsabnormalitieschromosomalseptalcasesvariationsChromosomalstudymicroarraychromosomeprenataldiagnosisventricular3%additionalidentified13copynumberratepathogenicBACKGROUND:aimedevaluateapplicabilityrathertraditionalsuperiorgeneticcounselingrevealpotentialcorrelationsubmicroscopicaberrationsRESULTS:Among151VSD7952isolated72477%ultrasoundanomaliesKaryotype16Besides14consistentkaryotype202%abnormalpathogenetic5uncertainclinicalsignificanceVOUS2benigndetectionnon-isolated-VSDssignificantlyhigherisolated-VSDs361%26/72vs11/79 = 0001alsofoundresultsindicatingaffectedpregnancyterminationCONCLUSIONS:showedcombinedcytogeneticparticularlyeffectiveidentifyingfetusescaneffectobstetricaloutcomeselucidationetiologysuggestedgenemutationsfactorsmayimplicatedfetalabnormalityPrenatalVentricular

Similar Articles

Cited By