Plastic and reconstructive Surgery is among the most competitive specialties in the residency match. Applicants seeking to maximize their chances of a successful match often submit numerous applications to the National Residency Matching Program. It is not uncommon for those applying to plastic and reconstructive Surgery to apply to every program. The high application volume imparts significant time and financial burden for applicants and programs alike. Furthermore, it makes distinguishing between applicants with a genuine interest in a specific program and those who are merely hoping to improve their chances vastly more difficult. The authors sought to characterize trends in the match rate, as the number of integrated plastic and reconstructive Surgery programs continues to increase. Furthermore, they reviewed the literature on game theory for possible solutions to residency application congestion. The authors propose the use of the game theory model to explain the observed results and show why an application limit is the most reasonable approach to address this issue.
References
National Resident Matching Program. National Resident Matching Program Results and Data: 2018 Main Residency Match. 2018.Washington, DC: National Resident Matching Program.
National Resident Matching Program.National Resident Matching Program, Data Release and Research Committee: Results of the 2017 NRMP Applicant Survey by Preferred Specialty and Applicant Type. 2017.Washington, DC: National Resident Matching Program.
Claiborne JR, Crantford JC, Swett KR, David LR. The plastic surgery match: Predicting success and improving the process. Ann Plast Surg. 2013;70:698–703.
Bernstein J. Not the last word: Want to match in an orthopaedic surgery residency? Send a rose to the program director. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2017;475:2845–2849.
Weissbart SJ, Hall SJ, Fultz BR, Stock JA. The urology match as a prisoner’s dilemma: A game theory perspective. Urology 2013;82:791–797.
Weissbart SJ, Kim SJ, Feinn RS, Stock JA. Relationship between the number of residency applications and the yearly match rate: Time to start thinking about an application limit? J Grad Med Educ. 2015;7:81–85.
Roth AE, Peranson E. The redesign of the matching market for American physicians: Some engineering aspects of economic design. Am Econ Rev. 1999;89:748–780.
National Resident Matching Program. National Resident Matching Program Results and Data: 2010 Main Residency Match. 2010.Washington, DC: National Resident Matching Program.
National Resident Matching Program. National Resident Matching Program Results and Data: 2011 Main Residency Match. 2011.Washington, DC: National Resident Matching Program.
National Resident Matching Program. National Resident Matching Program Results and Data: 2012 Main Residency Match. 2012.Washington, DC: National Resident Matching Program.
National Resident Matching Program. National Resident Matching Program Results and Data: 2013 Main Residency Match. 2013.Washington, DC: National Resident Matching Program.
National Resident Matching Program. National Resident Matching Program Results and Data: 2014 Main Residency Match. 2014.Washington, DC: National Resident Matching Program.
National Resident Matching Program. National Resident Matching Program Results and Data: 2015 Main Residency Match. 2015.Washington, DC: National Resident Matching Program.
National Resident Matching Program. National Resident Matching Program Results and Data: 2016 Main Residency Match. 2016.Washington, DC: National Resident Matching Program.
National Resident Matching Program. National Resident Matching Program Results and Data: 2017 Main Residency Match. 2017.Washington, DC: National Resident Matching Program.
National Resident Matching Program. National Resident Matching Program, Data Release and Research Committee: Results of the 2018 NRMP Applicant Survey by Preferred Specialty and Applicant Type. 2018.Washington, DC: National Resident Matching Program.
American Association of Medical Colleges. Preliminary data, ERAS 2018. Available at: https://www.aamc.org/download/358760/data/residency.xlsx. Accessed January 3, 2018.
National Resident Matching Program. National Resident Matching Program, Data Release and Research Committee: Results of the 2015 NRMP Applicant Survey by Preferred Specialty and Applicant Type. 2015.Washington, DC: National Resident Matching Program.
National Resident Matching Program. National Resident Matching Program, Data Release and Research Committee: Results of the 2013 NRMP Applicant Survey by Preferred Specialty and Applicant Type. 2013.Washington, DC: National Resident Matching Program.
National Resident Matching Program. National Resident Matching Program, Data Release and Research Committee: Results of the 2011 NRMP Applicant Survey by Preferred Specialty and Applicant Type. 2011.Washington, DC: National Resident Matching Program.
National Resident Matching Program. National Resident Matching Program, Data Release and Research Committee: Results of the 2016 NRMP Program Director Survey. 2016.Washington, DC: National Resident Matching Program.
National Resident Matching Program. National Resident Matching Program, Data Release and Research Committee: Results of the 2014 NRMP Program Director Survey. 2014.Washington, DC: National Resident Matching Program.
National Resident Matching Program. National Resident Matching Program, Data Release and Research Committee: Results of the 2012 NRMP Program Director Survey. 2012.Washington, DC: National Resident Matching Program.
Arnosti N, Johari R, Kanoria Y. Managing congestion in matching markets. Available at: https://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=2427960. Accessed December 1, 2017.
Pereira AG, Chelminski PR, Chheda SG, et al.; Medical Student to Resident Interface Committee Workgroup on the Interview Season. Application inflation for internal medicine applicants in the match: Drivers, consequences, and potential solutions. Am J Med. 2016;129:885–891.
Tadisina KK, Gharb BB, Orra S, Kwiecien G, Bernard S, Zins JE. Reply: Applying to integrated plastic surgery residency programs: Trends in the past 5 years of the match. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2017;139:330e–331e.
Tadisina KK, Orra S, Bassiri Gharb B, Kwiecien G, Bernard S, Zins JE. Applying to integrated plastic surgery residency programs: Trends in the past 5 years of the match. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2016;137:1344–1353.
Malafa MM, Nagarkar PA, Janis JE. Insights from the San Francisco Match rank list data: How many interviews does it take to match? Ann Plast Surg. 2014;72:584–588.
Sinno S, Mehta K, Squitieri L, et al. Residency characteristics that matter most to plastic surgery applicants: A multi-institutional analysis and review of the literature. Ann Plast Surg. 2015;74:713–717.
Janis JE, Hatef DA. Resident selection protocols in plastic surgery: A national survey of plastic surgery program directors. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2008;122:1929–1939; discussion 19401941.
Nagarkar PA, Janis JE. Fixing the “match”: How to play the game. J Grad Med Educ. 2012;4:142–147.
Nagarkar PA, Janis JE. Fixing the match: A survey of resident behaviors. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2013;132:711–719.
Coles P, Kushnir A, Niederle M. Preference signaling in matching markets. Am Econ J. 2013;5:99–134.
Lee S, Niederle M. Propose with a rose? Signaling in internet dating markets. Exp Econ. 2015;18:731–755.
Drolet BC, Brower JP, Lifchez SD, Janis JE, Liu PY. Away rotations and matching in integrated plastic surgery residency: Applicant and program director perspectives. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2016;137:1337–1343.
Mann S. How many residency applications? AAMC News: Medical Education. June 19, 2017. Available at: https://news.aamc.org/medical-education/article/how-many-residency-applications-strategy. Accessed March 20, 2018.
