Study of Stepwise Acquisition of and Mutations Conferring Bedaquiline Resistance.

Nabila Ismail, Nazir A Ismail, Shaheed V Omar, Remco P H Peters
Author Information
  1. Nabila Ismail: Department of Medical Microbiology, Faculty of Health Sciences, University of Pretoria, Prinshof, Gauteng, South Africa. ORCID
  2. Nazir A Ismail: Department of Medical Microbiology, Faculty of Health Sciences, University of Pretoria, Prinshof, Gauteng, South Africa.
  3. Shaheed V Omar: WHO Supranational Tuberculosis Reference Laboratory, National Health Laboratory Service, National Institute for Communicable Diseases, Sandringham, Gauteng, South Africa.
  4. Remco P H Peters: Department of Medical Microbiology, Faculty of Health Sciences, University of Pretoria, Prinshof, Gauteng, South Africa rph.peters@gmail.com. ORCID

Abstract

Bedaquiline resistance within may arise through efflux-based () or target-based () pathway mutations. mutant populations from each of five sequential steps in a passaging approach, using a pyrazinamide-resistant ATCC strain, were subjected to MIC determinations and whole-genome sequencing. Exposure to increasing bedaquiline concentrations resulted in increasing phenotypic resistance (up to >2 μg/ml) through MIC determination on solid medium (Middlebrook 7H10). mutations were dynamic, while mutations were fixed, once occurring. We present the following hypothesis for emergence of bedaquiline resistance: mutations may be the first transient step in low-level resistance acquisition, followed by high-level resistance due to fixed mutations.

Keywords

References

  1. N Engl J Med. 2015 Nov 12;373(20):1986-8 [PMID: 26559594]
  2. ACS Infect Dis. 2016 Aug 12;2(8):552-63 [PMID: 27626295]
  3. PLoS One. 2014 Jul 10;9(7):e102135 [PMID: 25010492]
  4. Indian J Microbiol. 2017 Dec;57(4):371-377 [PMID: 29151636]
  5. Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 2014 May;58(5):2979-81 [PMID: 24590481]
  6. J Microbiol Methods. 2018 Oct;153:1-9 [PMID: 30165087]
  7. J Antimicrob Chemother. 2017 Jul 1;72(7):1901-1906 [PMID: 28387862]
  8. Clin Infect Dis. 2018 May 2;66(10):1625-1630 [PMID: 29126225]
  9. Afr J Lab Med. 2019 Feb 21;8(1):801 [PMID: 30863717]
  10. Data Brief. 2018 Sep 24;20:1975-1983 [PMID: 30306102]
  11. Sci Rep. 2015 Dec 01;5:17507 [PMID: 26620446]
  12. J Infect Dis. 2012 Dec 1;206(11):1724-33 [PMID: 22984115]
  13. J Antimicrob Chemother. 2017 Mar 1;72(3):684-690 [PMID: 28031270]
  14. Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 2010 Mar;54(3):1022-8 [PMID: 20038615]
  15. J Clin Microbiol. 2016 Dec;54(12):2956-2962 [PMID: 27654337]
  16. Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 2012 May;56(5):2326-34 [PMID: 22354303]

MeSH Term

Antitubercular Agents
Bacterial Proteins
Bacterial Proton-Translocating ATPases
Diarylquinolines
Drug Resistance, Bacterial
Microbial Sensitivity Tests
Mutation
Mycobacterium tuberculosis

Chemicals

Antitubercular Agents
Bacterial Proteins
Diarylquinolines
bedaquiline
Bacterial Proton-Translocating ATPases

Word Cloud

Created with Highcharts 10.0.0mutationsresistancebedaquilineBedaquilinemayMICincreasingfixedacquisitionwithinariseefflux-basedtarget-basedpathwaymutantpopulationsfivesequentialstepspassagingapproachusingpyrazinamide-resistantATCCstrainsubjecteddeterminationswhole-genomesequencingExposureconcentrationsresultedphenotypic>2μg/mldeterminationsolidmediumMiddlebrook7H10dynamicoccurringpresentfollowinghypothesisemergenceresistance:firsttransientsteplow-levelfollowedhigh-leveldueStudyStepwiseAcquisitionMutationsConferringResistanceMycobacteriumtuberculosisatpEvitromodelrv0678stepwise

Similar Articles

Cited By