Interventions targeting working memory in 4-11 year olds within their everyday contexts: A systematic review.

Anita Rowe, Jill Titterington, Joni Holmes, Lucy Henry, Laurence Taggart
Author Information
  1. Anita Rowe: Institute of Nursing and Health Research, Ulster University, Shore Road, Newtownabbey, Co Antrim BT37 0QB, Northern Ireland, United Kingdom.
  2. Jill Titterington: Institute of Nursing and Health Research, Ulster University, Shore Road, Newtownabbey, Co Antrim BT37 0QB, Northern Ireland, United Kingdom.
  3. Joni Holmes: MRC Cognition & Brain Sciences Unit, University of Cambridge, 15 Chaucer Road, Cambridge CB2 7EF, England, United Kingdom.
  4. Lucy Henry: Division of Language and Communication Science, City, University of London, 10 Northampton Square, London EC1V 0HB, England, United Kingdom.
  5. Laurence Taggart: Institute of Nursing and Health Research, Ulster University, Shore Road, Newtownabbey, Co Antrim BT37 0QB, Northern Ireland, United Kingdom.

Abstract

It has been suggested that diverse interventions applied within children's everyday contexts have the potential to improve working memory (WM) and produce transfer to real-world skills but little is known about the effectiveness of these approaches. This review aims to examine systematically the effectiveness of non-computerised interventions with 4-11 year olds to identify: (i) their effects on WM; (ii) whether benefits extend to near- and far-transfer measures; (iii) if gains are sustained over time; (iv) the active ingredients; and (v) the optimum dosage. Searches were conducted across 12 electronic databases using consistent keywords. Papers were screened by title and abstract ( 6212) and judged against pre-defined eligibility criteria ( 63). Eighteen papers were included in the review. They used a range of non-computerised WM intervention approaches that included: (i) adapting the environment to reduce WM loads; (ii) direct WM training with and without strategy instruction; and (iii) training skills which may indirectly impact on WM (physical activity, phonological awareness, fantastical play and inhibition). Both direct training on WM tasks and practicing certain skills that may impact indirectly on WM (physical activity, fantastical play and inhibition) produced improvements on WM tasks, with some benefits for near-transfer activities. The common ingredient across effective interventions was the executive-loaded nature of the trained task i.e., training on a task that taps into attentional and processing resources under executive control and not just the storage of information. Few studies reported dosage effects, measured far-transfer effects ( 4), or tested the durability of gains over time ( 4). The lack of a clear theoretical framework in many of the included studies resulted in ambiguous predictions about training and transfer effects, and inadequate use of outcome measures. Methodological issues also constrain the strength of the evidence, including: small samples sizes; an absence of blinding of participant and outcome assessors; and lack of active control groups. Further well-designed and controlled studies with clear theoretical underpinnings are required to expand and enhance the evidence base. The heterogeneity of the interventions and of the study designs (randomised and non-randomised) in the included papers limited the synthesis of evidence across studies. However, this diversity enabled the identification of key ingredients, notably the training of executive-loaded WM tasks, which can help inform novel approaches to WM intervention in everyday contexts.

Keywords

References

  1. SSM Popul Health. 2017 Dec;3:132-135 [PMID: 29302610]
  2. Dev Psychol. 2017 May;53(5):971-995 [PMID: 28459277]
  3. Mem Cognit. 2016 Nov;44(8):1183-1191 [PMID: 27443320]
  4. Psychon Bull Rev. 2017 Aug;24(4):1077-1096 [PMID: 28116702]
  5. Annu Rev Public Health. 2015 Mar 18;36:307-23 [PMID: 25581153]
  6. Int J Speech Lang Pathol. 2018 Jun;20(3):318-323 [PMID: 29788772]
  7. Prog Brain Res. 2008;169:323-38 [PMID: 18394484]
  8. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2014 Jan;95(1 Suppl):S33-44.e2 [PMID: 24370323]
  9. Psychol Bull. 2002 Jul;128(4):612-37 [PMID: 12081085]
  10. Percept Mot Skills. 2015 Jun;120(3):766-75 [PMID: 26029969]
  11. J Exp Child Psychol. 2003 May;85(1):1-31 [PMID: 12742760]
  12. J Exp Child Psychol. 2006 Mar;93(3):265-81 [PMID: 16293261]
  13. Br J Educ Psychol. 2015 Sep;85(3):424-39 [PMID: 26099785]
  14. PLoS Med. 2009 Jul 21;6(7):e1000097 [PMID: 19621072]
  15. Nat Rev Neurosci. 2013 May;14(5):365-76 [PMID: 23571845]
  16. J Atten Disord. 2013 Nov;17(8):711-21 [PMID: 22392551]
  17. Dev Psychol. 2017 Apr;53(4):671-685 [PMID: 28165253]
  18. J Clin Exp Neuropsychol. 2002 Sep;24(6):781-91 [PMID: 12424652]
  19. Dyslexia. 2004 Aug;10(3):196-214 [PMID: 15341198]
  20. Mem Cognit. 2006 Dec;34(8):1754-68 [PMID: 17489300]
  21. Child Neuropsychol. 2016;22(1):81-98 [PMID: 25366543]
  22. Psychon Bull Rev. 2007 Oct;14(5):919-24 [PMID: 18087960]
  23. Psychol Aging. 2017 Dec;32(8):732-746 [PMID: 29239658]
  24. Dev Sci. 2011 Sep;14(5):1046-58 [PMID: 21884320]
  25. Mem Cognit. 2016 May;44(4):580-9 [PMID: 26680246]
  26. Psychol Sci. 2010 Nov;21(11):1694-700 [PMID: 20921571]
  27. Cortex. 2013 Nov-Dec;49(10):2674-88 [PMID: 23890692]
  28. Appl Neuropsychol Child. 2014;3(3):205-14 [PMID: 25010086]
  29. Science. 2011 Aug 19;333(6045):959-64 [PMID: 21852486]
  30. Psychol Rev. 1956 Mar;63(2):81-97 [PMID: 13310704]
  31. J Exp Child Psychol. 2004 Jun;88(2):121-51 [PMID: 15157755]
  32. Health Educ Q. 1988 Winter;15(4):351-77 [PMID: 3068205]
  33. Br J Educ Psychol. 2000 Jun;70 ( Pt 2):177-94 [PMID: 10900777]
  34. Pediatr Exerc Sci. 2016 Feb;28(1):64-70 [PMID: 26252883]
  35. Am Sci. 1982 Nov-Dec;70(6):607-15 [PMID: 7181217]
  36. Front Psychol. 2015 Aug 03;6:1097 [PMID: 26284017]
  37. Trends Cogn Sci. 2000 Nov 1;4(11):417-423 [PMID: 11058819]
  38. Perspect Psychol Sci. 2016 Jul;11(4):512-34 [PMID: 27474138]
  39. Dev Psychol. 2013 Feb;49(2):270-91 [PMID: 22612437]
  40. Am J Public Health. 2004 Mar;94(3):361-6 [PMID: 14998794]
  41. Syst Rev. 2015 Mar 28;4:36 [PMID: 25875303]
  42. BMJ. 2014 Mar 07;348:g1687 [PMID: 24609605]
  43. J Learn Disabil. 2009 May-Jun;42(3):260-87 [PMID: 19255286]
  44. J Exp Child Psychol. 2016 May;145:120-38 [PMID: 26835841]
  45. Behav Brain Sci. 2001 Feb;24(1):87-114; discussion 114-85 [PMID: 11515286]
  46. Evaluation (Lond). 2016 Jul;22(3):286-303 [PMID: 27478401]
  47. Dev Sci. 2013 Nov;16(6):915-25 [PMID: 24093880]
  48. Psychol Rev. 1998 Jan;105(1):158-73 [PMID: 9450375]
  49. Trends Cogn Sci. 2010 Jul;14(7):317-24 [PMID: 20630350]
  50. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2011 Jun 21;108(25):10081-6 [PMID: 21670271]
  51. Int J Lang Commun Disord. 2018 Jul;53(4):718-734 [PMID: 29900638]
  52. Syst Rev. 2015 Jan 01;4:1 [PMID: 25554246]
  53. Psychol Sci Public Interest. 2016 Oct;17(3):103-186 [PMID: 27697851]
  54. J Learn Disabil. 1994 Jan;27(1):34-50 [PMID: 8133185]
  55. PLoS One. 2016 Jul 08;11(7):e0158753 [PMID: 27392128]
  56. Restor Neurol Neurosci. 2009;27(5):435-53 [PMID: 19847069]
  57. Dev Neuropsychol. 2015;40(4):201-15 [PMID: 26179487]
  58. J Mem Lang. 2016 Sep 12;105:19-42 [PMID: 31235992]
  59. Front Psychol. 2015 Apr 30;6:519 [PMID: 25983703]
  60. BMJ. 2004 Jun 19;328(7454):1490 [PMID: 15205295]
  61. Dev Psychol. 2004 Mar;40(2):177-90 [PMID: 14979759]
  62. Psychol Res. 2005 Jun;69(5-6):412-9 [PMID: 15856289]
  63. Res Q Exerc Sport. 2007 Dec;78(5):510-9 [PMID: 18274222]
  64. Percept Mot Skills. 2016 Feb;122(1):27-46 [PMID: 27420304]
  65. Med Sci Sports Exerc. 2016 Jun;48(6):1144-52 [PMID: 26765631]
  66. J Learn Disabil. 2017 Jan;50(1):62-80 [PMID: 26156961]
  67. Curr Dir Psychol Sci. 2012 Oct;21(5):335-341 [PMID: 25328287]
  68. Ment Retard Dev Disabil Res Rev. 2007;13(1):70-7 [PMID: 17326112]
  69. Neuropsychol Rehabil. 2016 Oct;26(5-6):645-72 [PMID: 25886202]
  70. J Appl Res Mem Cogn. 2016 Dec;5(4):384-394 [PMID: 28066703]
  71. Syst Rev. 2012 Jun 09;1:28 [PMID: 22681772]
  72. J Exp Psychol Gen. 2018 Jun;147(6):829-858 [PMID: 29888939]
  73. Adv Cogn Psychol. 2011;7:7-15 [PMID: 21818243]
  74. Front Psychol. 2015 Aug 17;6:1230 [PMID: 26347692]
  75. PLoS One. 2017 Dec 11;12(12):e0188693 [PMID: 29228008]
  76. Res Dev Disabil. 2015 May;40:51-62 [PMID: 25725389]
  77. Psychol Res. 2014 Nov;78(6):803-20 [PMID: 24213250]
  78. Ann Intern Med. 2010 Jun 1;152(11):726-32 [PMID: 20335313]
  79. Cogn Neuropsychol. 2015;32(3-4):104-32 [PMID: 25734525]
  80. Educ Psychol Rev. 2015 Dec 1;27(4):617-633 [PMID: 26640352]
  81. Child Dev. 2009 Mar-Apr;80(2):606-21 [PMID: 19467014]
  82. J Learn Disabil. 2008 May-Jun;41(3):251-62 [PMID: 18434291]
  83. J Child Psychol Psychiatry. 1998 Jan;39(1):3-27 [PMID: 9534084]
  84. Mem Cognit. 2014 Aug;42(6):854-62 [PMID: 24748348]

Grants

  1. MC_UP_A060_1103/Medical Research Council
  2. MC_UU_00005/2/Medical Research Council
  3. MC_UU_00005/7/Medical Research Council

Word Cloud

Created with Highcharts 10.0.0WMtraininginterventionseffectsstudieseverydaymemoryskillsapproachesreviewacrossincludedtasksevidencewithincontextsworkingtransfereffectivenessnon-computerised4-11 yearoldsiibenefitsfar-transfermeasuresiiigainstimeactiveingredientsdosagepapersinterventiondirectmayindirectlyimpactphysicalactivityfantasticalplayinhibitionexecutive-loadedtaskcontrol 4lackcleartheoreticaloutcomesuggesteddiverseappliedchildren'spotentialimproveproducereal-worldlittleknownaimsexaminesystematicallyidentify:whetherextendnear-sustainedivvoptimumSearchesconducted12electronicdatabasesusingconsistentkeywordsPapersscreenedtitleabstract 6212judgedpre-definedeligibilitycriteria 63Eighteenusedrangeincluded:adaptingenvironmentreduceloadswithoutstrategyinstructionphonologicalawarenesspracticingcertainproducedimprovementsnear-transferactivitiescommoningredienteffectivenaturetrainedietapsattentionalprocessingresourcesexecutivejuststorageinformationreportedmeasuredtesteddurabilityframeworkmanyresultedambiguouspredictionsinadequateuseMethodologicalissuesalsoconstrainstrengthincluding:smallsamplessizesabsenceblindingparticipantassessorsgroupswell-designedcontrolledunderpinningsrequiredexpandenhancebaseheterogeneitystudydesignsrandomisednon-randomisedlimitedsynthesisHoweverdiversityenabledidentificationkeynotablycanhelpinformnovelInterventionstargetingcontexts:systematicChildrenDurabilityFar-transferNear-transferWorking

Similar Articles

Cited By