Positioning Error Analysis and Control of a Piezo-Driven 6-DOF Micro-Positioner.

Chao Lin, Shan Zheng, Pingyang Li, Zhonglei Shen, Shuang Wang
Author Information
  1. Chao Lin: State Key Laboratory of Mechanical Transmission, Chongqing University, Chongqing 400030, China. linchao@cqu.edu.cn. ORCID
  2. Shan Zheng: State Key Laboratory of Mechanical Transmission, Chongqing University, Chongqing 400030, China.
  3. Pingyang Li: State Key Laboratory of Mechanical Transmission, Chongqing University, Chongqing 400030, China.
  4. Zhonglei Shen: State Key Laboratory of Mechanical Transmission, Chongqing University, Chongqing 400030, China.
  5. Shuang Wang: State Key Laboratory of Mechanical Transmission, Chongqing University, Chongqing 400030, China.

Abstract

This paper presents a positioning error model and a control compensation scheme for a six-degree-of-freedom (6-DOF) micro-positioner based on a compliant mechanism and piezoelectric actuators (PZT). The positioning error model is established by means of the kinematic model of the compliant mechanism and complete differential coefficient theory, which includes the relationships between three typical errors (hysteresis, machining and measuring errors) and the total positioning error. The quantitative analysis of three errors is demonstrated through several experimental studies. Afterwards, an inverse Presiach model-based feedforward compensation of the hysteresis nonlinearity is employed by the control scheme, combined with a proportional-integral-derivative (PID) feedback controller for the compensation of machining and measuring errors. Moreover, a back propagation neural network PID (BP-PID) controller and a cerebellar model articulation controller neural network PID (CMAC-PID) controller are also adopted and compared to obtain optimal control. Taking the translational motion along the X axis as an example, the positioning errors are sharply reduced by the inverse hysteresis model with the maximum error of 12.76% and a root-mean-square error of 4.09%. In combination with the CMAC-PID controller, the errors are decreased to 0.63% and 0.23%, respectively. Hence, simulated and experimental results reveal that the proposed approach can improve the positioning accuracy of 6-DOF for the micro-positioner.

Keywords

References

  1. Rev Sci Instrum. 2012 Jun;83(6):065106 [PMID: 22755661]
  2. Opt Express. 2013 Nov 4;21(22):25805-19 [PMID: 24216807]
  3. Rev Sci Instrum. 2014 May;85(5):055112 [PMID: 24880420]

Grants

  1. 51675060/National Natural Science Foundation of China
  2. 106112017CDJPT280002/Fundamental Research Funds for the Central Universities

Word Cloud

Created with Highcharts 10.0.0positioningerrormodelerrorscontrollercontrolcompensationhysteresis6-DOFmicro-positionercompliantmechanismPIDschemethreemachiningmeasuringexperimentalinversenonlinearityneuralnetworkCMAC-PID0paperpresentssix-degree-of-freedombasedpiezoelectricactuatorsPZTestablishedmeanskinematiccompletedifferentialcoefficienttheoryincludesrelationshipstypicaltotalquantitativeanalysisdemonstratedseveralstudiesAfterwardsPresiachmodel-basedfeedforwardemployedcombinedproportional-integral-derivativefeedbackMoreoverbackpropagationBP-PIDcerebellararticulationalsoadoptedcomparedobtainoptimalTakingtranslationalmotionalongXaxisexamplesharplyreducedmaximum1276%root-mean-square409%combinationdecreased63%23%respectivelyHencesimulatedresultsrevealproposedapproachcanimproveaccuracyPositioningErrorAnalysisControlPiezo-DrivenMicro-Positioner

Similar Articles

Cited By