OpenLB
Open Library of Bioscience
Advanced Search
Journal of the experimental analysis of behavior
11, 2019;112 (3): 349-353.

Analysis of apparent demonstrations of responding in accordance with relational frames of sameness and opposition by Alonso-Alvarez and Perez-Gonzalez (2018): A rejoinder.

Ian Stewart, Simon Dymond, Bryan Roche
Author Information
  1. Ian Stewart: National University of Ireland, Galway.
  2. Simon Dymond: Swansea University.
  3. Bryan Roche: Maynooth University.
PMID: 31650554 DOI: 10.1002/jeab.555

Abstract

No abstract text available.

References

  1. Alonso-Alvarez, B., & Perez-Gonzalez, L. A. (2017). Contextual control over equivalence and non-equivalence explains apparent arbitrary applicable relational responding in accordance with sameness and opposition. Learning and Behavior, 110, 228-242. doi: https://doi.org/10.3758/s13420-017-0258-1
  2. Alonso-Alvarez, B., & Perez-Gonzalez, L. A. (2018). Analysis of apparent demonstrations of responding in accordance with relational frames of sameness and opposition. Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 110(2), 213-228. doi: https://doi.org/10.1002/jeab.458
  3. Barnes-Holmes, Y., Barnes-Holmes, D., & Smeets, P. M. (2004). Establishing relational responding in accordance with opposite as generalized operant behavior in young children. International Journal of Psychology and Psychological Therapy, 4, 559-586.
  4. Cassidy, S., Roche, B., & Hayes, S. C. (2011). A relational frame training intervention to raise intelligence quotients: A pilot study. The Psychological Record, 61, 173-198. doi: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF03395755
  5. Colbert, D., Tyndall, I., Roche, B., & Cassidy, S. (2018). Can SMART training really increase intelligence? A replication study. Journal of Behavioral Education, 27, 509-531. doi: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10864-018-9302-2
  6. Dougher, M. J., Hamilton, D. A., Fink, B. C., & Harrington, J. (2007). Transformation of the discriminative and eliciting functions of generalized relational stimuli. Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 88, 179-197. doi: https://doi.org/10.1901/jeab.2007.45-05
  7. Dymond, S., & Barnes, D. (1995). A transformation of self-discrimination response functions in accordance with the arbitrarily applicable relations of sameness, more than, and less than. Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 64, 163-184. doi: https://doi.org/10.1901/jeab.1995.64-163.
  8. Dymond, S., & Barnes, D. (1996). A transformation of self-discrimination response functions in accordance with the arbitrarily applicable relations of sameness and opposition. The Psychological Record, 46, 271-300.
  9. Dymond, S., & Roche, B. (2013). Advances in relational frame theory: Research and application. Oakland, CA: New Harbinger Publications, Inc.
  10. Dymond, S., Roche, B., Forsyth, J. P., Whelan, R., & Rhoden, J. (2007). Transformation of avoidance response functions in accordance with the relational frames of same and opposite. Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 88, 249-262. doi: https://doi.org/10.1901/jeab.2007.22-07
  11. Dymond, S., Roche, B., Forsyth, J. P., Whelan, R., & Rhoden, J. (2008). Derived avoidance learning: Transformation of avoidance response functions in accordance with the relational frames of same and opposite. The Psychological Record, 58, 271-288.
  12. Hayes, S. C., Barnes-Holmes, D., & Roche, B. (2001). Relational frame theory: A post-Skinnerian account of human language and cognition. New York: Plenum Press.
  13. Hayes, J., & Stewart, I. (2016). Comparing the effects of derived relational training and computer coding on intellectual potential in school-age children. British Journal of Educational Psychology, 86, 397-411. doi: https://doi.org/10.1111/bjep.12114
  14. Hoon, A. E., Bickford, C., Samuels, L., & Dymond, S. (2019): ‘This slot is hotter than that one’: Symbolic generalization of slot machine preference in simulated gambling. International Gambling Studies. doi: https://doi.org/10.1080/14459795.2019.1602159
  15. Hughes, S., Barnes-Holmes, D., Van Dessel, P., de Almeida, J. H., Stewart, I., & De Houwer, J. (2018). On the symbolic generalization of likes and dislikes. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 79, 365-377. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jesp.2018.09.002
  16. May, R. J., Stewart, I., Baez, L., Freegard, G., & Dymond, S. (2017). Arbitrarily applicable spatial relational responding. Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 107, 234-257. doi: https://doi.org/10.1002/jeab.250.
  17. McLoughlin, S., & Stewart, I. (2017). Empirical advances in studying relational networks. Journal of Contextual Behavioral Science, 6, 329-342. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcbs.2016.11.009
  18. Munnelly, A., Stewart, I., & Dymond, S. (2019). Symbolic generalization of discriminative functions in accordance with a five-member comparative relational network. The Psychological Record. doi: https://doi.org/10.1007/s40732-019-00350-9
  19. O'Hora, D., Barnes-Holmes, D., Roche, B., & Smeets, P. M. (2004). Derived relational networks and control by novel instructions: A possible model of generative verbal responding. The Psychological Record, 54, 437-460. doi: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF03395484
  20. O'Hora, D., Barnes-Holmes, D., & Stewart, I. (2014). A relational network model of derived instructional control: Antecedent and consequential control of derived instruction following. Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 102, 66-85. doi: https://doi.org/10.1002/jeab.95
  21. Perez, W. F., de Almeida, J. H., & de Rose, J. C. (2015). Transformation of meaning through relations of sameness and opposition. The Psychological Record, 65, 679-689. doi: https://doi.org/10.1007/s40732-015-0138-z
  22. Slattery, B., & Stewart, I. (2014). Hierarchical classification as relational framing. Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 101, 61-75. doi: https://doi.org/10.1002/jeab.63
  23. Steele, D. L., & Hayes, S. C. (1991). Stimulus equivalence and arbitrarily applicable relational responding. Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 56, 519-555. doi: https://doi.org/10.1901/jeab.1991.56-519
  24. Stewart, I., Hooper, N., Walsh, P., O'Keefe, R., Joyce, R., & McHugh, L. (2015). Transformation of thought suppression functions via same and opposite relations. The Psychological Record, 65(2), 375-399. doi: https://doi.org/10.1007/s40732-014-0113-0
  25. Stewart, I., Slattery, B., Chambers, M., & Dymond, S. (2018). An empirical investigation of part-whole hierarchical relations. European Journal of Behavior Analysis, 19, 115-124. doi: https://doi.org/10.1080/15021149.2017.1416525
  26. Whelan, R., & Barnes-Holmes, D. (2004). The transformation of consequential functions in accordance with the relational frames of same and opposite. Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 82, 177-195. doi: https://doi.org/10.1901/jeab.2004.82-177
  27. Whelan, R., Barnes-Holmes, D., & Dymond, S. (2006). The transformation of consequential functions in accordance with the relational frames of more-than and less-than. Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 86, 317-335. doi: https://doi.org/10.1901/jeab.2006.113-04
  28. Wray, A. M., Dougher, M. J., Hamilton, D. A., & Guinther, P. M. (2012). Examining the reinforcing properties of making sense: A preliminary investigation. The Psychological Record, 62, 599-622. doi: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF03395823

MeSH Term

Cues
Discrimination Learning
Journal Article Comment
Article has an altmetric score of 1

Word Cloud

Created with Highcharts 10.0.0AnalysisapparentdemonstrationsrespondingaccordancerelationalframessamenessoppositionAlonso-AlvarezPerez-Gonzalez2018:rejoinder

Similar Articles

Cited By

No available data.