Adult-onset neuroblastoma: Report of seven cases with molecular genetic characterization.

Kai Duan, Brendan C Dickson, Paula Marrano, Paul S Thorner, Catherine T Chung
Author Information
  1. Kai Duan: Department of Laboratory Medicine and Pathobiology, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.
  2. Brendan C Dickson: Department of Laboratory Medicine and Pathobiology, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada. ORCID
  3. Paula Marrano: Division of Pathology, The Hospital for Sick Children, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.
  4. Paul S Thorner: Department of Laboratory Medicine and Pathobiology, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada. ORCID
  5. Catherine T Chung: Department of Laboratory Medicine and Pathobiology, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.

Abstract

Whereas neuroblastoma is the most common extracranial solid tumor of childhood, less than 5% of cases occur in adults. Pediatric neuroblastoma shows marked heterogeneity of histology and molecular biology. Information about this tumor in adults is limited, especially regarding molecular biology. We report a series of nine neuroblastoma cases diagnosed in adulthood (18 to 40 years old) with molecular biologic characterization in seven. All tumors were Schwannian stroma-poor, and mostly poorly differentiated. tumors expressed neural markers including PHOX2B, NB84, synaptophysin, chromogranin, CD56, neuron-specific enolase, and PGP9.5. Two out of six cases expressed ALK and one had the F1174 L mutation reported in childhood neuroblastoma. Fluorescent in situ hybridization (FISH) revealed MYCN amplification in 2/7 cases, chromosome 1p deletion in 1/5 cases and 17q gain in 4/4 cases. One in five cases showed loss of ATRX expression by immunohistochemistry and alternate lengthening of telomeres by FISH. Zero out of five cases showed rearrangement of the TERT gene by FISH, but one case showed high level amplification. In conclusion, the morphology and immunophenotype of adult-onset neuroblastoma are similar to pediatric cases although less differentiated than some childhood tumors. Similarly, molecular genetic alterations in adult-onset neuroblastoma are not unique to this age group. However, 80% of cases tested showed genetic changes that would promote maintenance of telomeres, which is a molecular marker of high risk cases. This may help explain the poor response in adults to pediatric treatment protocols. Additional studies to characterize the biology of this tumor in the adult age group will facilitate the design of more personalized therapeutic approaches.

Keywords

References

  1. Maris JM. Recent advances in neuroblastoma. N Engl J Med. 2010;362(23):2202-2211.
  2. Matthay KK, Maris JM, Schleiermacher G, et al. Neuroblastoma. Nat Rev Dis Primers. 2016;2:16078.
  3. Thorner P. The molecular genetic profile of neuroblastoma. Diagnostic Histopathol. 2014;20(2):76-83.
  4. London WB, Castleberry RP, Matthay KK, et al. Evidence for an age cutoff greater than 365 days for neuroblastoma risk group stratification in the children's oncology group. J Clin Oncol. 2005;23(27):6459-6465.
  5. Maris JM, Hogarty MD, Bagatell R, Cohn SL. Neuroblastoma. Lancet. 2007;369(9579):2106-2120.
  6. Riley RD, Heney D, Jones DR, et al. A systematic review of molecular and biological tumor markers in neuroblastoma. Clin Cancer Res. 2004;10(1):4-12.
  7. Bagatell R, Beck-Popovic M, London WB, et al. Significance of MYCN amplification in international neuroblastoma staging system stage 1 and 2 neuroblastoma: a report from the International Neuroblastoma Risk Group database. J Clin Oncol. 2009;27(3):365-370.
  8. Matsuno R, Gifford AJ, Fang J, et al. Rare MYC-amplified neuroblastoma with large cell histology. Pediatr Dev Pathol. 2018;21(5):461-466.
  9. Ambros PF, Ambros IM, Brodeur GM, et al. International consensus for neuroblastoma molecular diagnostics: report from the International Neuroblastoma Risk Group (INRG) Biology Committee. Br J Cancer. 2009;100(9):1471-1482.
  10. Janoueix-Lerosey I, Schleiermacher G, Michels E, et al. Overall genomic pattern is a predictor of outcome in neuroblastoma. J Clin Oncol. 2009;27(7):1026-1033.
  11. Schleiermacher G, Mosseri V, London WB, et al. Segmental chromosomal alterations have prognostic impact in neuroblastoma: a report from the INRG project. Br J Cancer. 2012;107(8):1418-1422.
  12. Cheung NK, Zhang J, Lu C, et al. Association of age at diagnosis and genetic mutations in patients with neuroblastoma. Jama. 2012;307(10):1062-1071.
  13. Pugh TJ, Morozova O, Attiyeh EF, et al. The genetic landscape of high-risk neuroblastoma. Nat Genet. 2013;45(3):279-284.
  14. Peifer M, Hertwig F, Roels F, et al. Telomerase activation by genomic rearrangements in high-risk neuroblastoma. Nature. 2015;526(7575):700-704.
  15. Valentijn LJ, Koster J, Zwijnenburg DA, et al. TERT rearrangements are frequent in neuroblastoma and identify aggressive tumors. Nat Genet. 2015;47(12):1411-1414.
  16. Cohn SL, Pearson AD, London WB, et al. The International Neuroblastoma Risk Group (INRG) classification system: an INRG Task Force report. J Clin Oncol. 2009;27(2):289-297.
  17. Allan SG, Cornbleet MA, Carmichael J, Arnott SJ, Smyth JF. Adult neuroblastoma: report of three cases and review of the literature. Cancer. 1986;57(12):2419-2421.
  18. Aleshire SL, Glick AD, Cruz VE, Bradley CA, Parl FF. Neuroblastoma in adults: pathologic findings and clinical outcome. Arch Pathol Lab Med. 1985;109(4):352-356.
  19. Berbegall AP, Villamon E, Tadeo I, et al. Neuroblastoma after childhood: prognostic relevance of segmental chromosome aberrations, ATRX protein status, and immune cell infiltration. Neoplasia. 2014;16(6):471-480.
  20. Castel V, Villamon E, Canete A, et al. Neuroblastoma in adolescents: genetic and clinical characterisation. Clin Transl Oncol. 2010;12(1):49-54.
  21. Conte M, Parodi S, De Bernardi B, et al. Neuroblastoma in adolescents: the Italian experience. Cancer. 2006;106(6):1409-1417.
  22. Conter HJ, Gopalakrishnan V, Ravi V, Ater JL, Patel S, Araujo DM. Adult versus pediatric neuroblastoma: the M.D. Anderson cancer center experience. Sarcoma. 2014;2014:375151.
  23. Dosik GM, Rodriguez V, Benjamin RS, Bodey GP. Neuroblastoma in the adult: effective combination chemotherapy. Cancer. 1978;41(1):56-63.
  24. Esiashvili N, Goodman M, Ward K, Marcus RB Jr, Johnstone PA. Neuroblastoma in adults: incidence and survival analysis based on SEER data. Pediatr Blood Cancer. 2007;49(1):41-46.
  25. Franks LM, Bollen A, Seeger RC, Stram DO, Matthay KK. Neuroblastoma in adults and adolescents: an indolent course with poor survival. Cancer. 1997;79(10):2028-2035.
  26. Grubb BP, Thant M. Neuroblastoma in an adult. South Med J. 1984;77(9):1180-1182.
  27. Hasegawa T, Hirose T, Ayala AG, et al. Adult neuroblastoma of the retroperitoneum and abdomen: clinicopathologic distinction from primitive neuroectodermal tumor. Am J Surg Pathol. 2001;25(7):918-924.
  28. Hung YP, Lee JP, Bellizzi AM, Hornick JL. PHOX2B reliably distinguishes neuroblastoma among small round blue cell tumours. Histopathology. 2017;71(5):786-794.
  29. Jrebi NY, Iqbal CW, Joliat GR, Sebo TJ, Farley DR. Review of our experience with neuroblastoma and ganglioneuroblastoma in adults. World J Surg. 2014;38(11):2871-2874.
  30. Kaye JA, Warhol MJ, Kretschmar C, Landsberg L, Frei E 3rd. Neuroblastoma in adults: three case reports and a review of the literature. Cancer. 1986;58(5):1149-1157.
  31. Koumarianou A, Oikonomopoulou P, Baka M, et al. Implications of the incidental finding of a MYCN amplified adrenal tumor: a case report and update of a pediatric disease diagnosed in adults. Case Rep Oncol Med. 2013;2013:393128.
  32. Kushner BH, Kramer K, LaQuaglia MP, Modak S, Cheung NK. Neuroblastoma in adolescents and adults: the memorial Sloan-Kettering experience. Med Pediatr Oncol. 2003;41(6):508-515.
  33. Lopez R, Karakousis C, Rao U. Treatment of adult neuroblastoma. Cancer. 1980;45(5):840-844.
  34. Mackay B, Luna MA, Butler JJ. Adult neuroblastoma: electron microscopic observations in nine cases. Cancer. 1976;37(3):1334-1351.
  35. Mazzocco K, Defferrari R, Sementa AR, et al. Genetic abnormalities in adolescents and young adults with neuroblastoma: a report from the Italian neuroblastoma group. Pediatr Blood Cancer. 2015;62(10):1725-1732.
  36. Podda MG, Luksch R, Polastri D, et al. Neuroblastoma in patients over 12 years old: a 20-year experience at the Istituto Nazionale Tumori of Milan. Tumori. 2010;96(5):684-689.
  37. Prestidge BR, Donaldson SS. Treatment results among adults with childhood tumors: a 20-year experience. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 1989;17(3):507-514.
  38. Ramsingh J, Casey H, Watson C. Adult neuroblastoma: a rare diagnosis of an adrenal mass. BMJ Case Rep. 2019;12(4):1-3.
  39. Rogowitz E, Babiker HM, Kanaan M, Millius RA, Ringenberg QS, Bishop M. Neuroblastoma of the elderly, an oncologist's nightmare: case presentation, literature review and SEER database analysis. Exp Hematol Oncol. 2014;3:20.
  40. Rowe PH, Oram JJ, Scott GW. Neuroblastoma in adults. Postgrad Med J. 1979;55(646):579-580.
  41. Smith L, Minter S, O'Brien P, Kraveka JM, Medina AM, Lazarchick J. Neuroblastoma in an adult: case presentation and literature review. Ann Clin Lab Sci. 2013;43(1):81-84.
  42. Sorrentino S, Gigliotti AR, Sementa AR, et al. Neuroblastoma in the adult: the Italian experience with 21 patients. J Pediatr Hematol Oncol. 2014;36(8):e499-e505.
  43. Suzuki M, Kushner BH, Kramer K, et al. Treatment and outcome of adult-onset neuroblastoma. Int J Cancer. 2018;143(5):1249-1258.
  44. Tang CK, Hajdu SI. Neuroblastoma in adolescence and adulthood. N Y State J Med. 1975;75(9):1434-1438.
  45. Simon T, Hero B, Schulte JH, et al. 2017 GPOH guidelines for diagnosis and treatment of patients with Neuroblastic Tumors. Klin Padiatr. 2017;229(3):147-167.
  46. Brodeur GM, Pritchard J, Berthold F, et al. Revisions of the international criteria for neuroblastoma diagnosis, staging, and response to treatment. J Clin Oncol. 1993;11(8):1466-1477.
  47. Joshi VV. Peripheral neuroblastic tumors: pathologic classification based on recommendations of international neuroblastoma pathology committee (modification of Shimada classification). Pediatr Dev Pathol. 2000;3(2):184-199.
  48. Shimada H, Ambros IM, Dehner LP, et al. The international neuroblastoma pathology classification (the Shimada system). Cancer. 1999;86(2):364-372.
  49. Angelini P, Baruchel S, Marrano P, Irwin MS, Thorner PS. The neuroblastoma and ganglion components of nodular ganglioneuroblastoma are genetically similar: evidence against separate clonal origins. Mod Pathol. 2015;28(2):166-176.
  50. Marrano P, Irwin MS, Thorner PS. Heterogeneity of MYCN amplification in neuroblastoma at diagnosis, treatment, relapse, and metastasis. Genes Chromosomes Cancer. 2017;56(1):28-41.
  51. Chami R, Marrano P, Teerapakpinyo C, et al. Immunohistochemistry for ATRX can miss ATRX mutations: lessons from neuroblastoma. Am J Surg Pathol. 2019;43(9):1203-1211.
  52. Heaphy CM, de Wilde RF, Jiao Y, et al. Altered telomeres in tumors with ATRX and DAXX mutations. Science. 2011;333(6041):425.
  53. Bryan TM, Englezou A, Dalla-Pozza L, Dunham MA, Reddel RR. Evidence for an alternative mechanism for maintaining telomere length in human tumors and tumor-derived cell lines. Nat Med. 1997;3(11):1271-1274.
  54. Duan XF, Zhao Q. TERT-mediated and ATRX-mediated telomere maintenance and neuroblastoma. J Pediatr Hematol Oncol. 2018;40(1):1-6.
  55. Berbegall AP, Bogen D, Potschger U, et al. Heterogeneous MYCN amplification in neuroblastoma: a SIOP Europe neuroblastoma study. Br J Cancer. 2018;118(11):1502-1512.
  56. Berbegall AP, Villamon E, Piqueras M, et al. Comparative genetic study of intratumoral heterogenous MYCN amplified neuroblastoma versus aggressive genetic profile neuroblastic tumors. Oncogene. 2016;35(11):1423-1432.
  57. Theissen J, Boensch M, Spitz R, et al. Heterogeneity of the MYCN oncogene in neuroblastoma. Clin Cancer Res. 2009;15(6):2085-2090.
  58. George RE, Sanda T, Hanna M, et al. Activating mutations in ALK provide a therapeutic target in neuroblastoma. Nature. 2008;455(7215):975-978.
  59. Passoni L, Longo L, Collini P, et al. Mutation-independent anaplastic lymphoma kinase overexpression in poor prognosis neuroblastoma patients. Cancer Res. 2009;69(18):7338-7346.
  60. Janoueix-Lerosey I, Lequin D, Brugieres L, et al. Somatic and germline activating mutations of the ALK kinase receptor in neuroblastoma. Nature. 2008;455(7215):967-970.
  61. Mosse YP, Laudenslager M, Longo L, et al. Identification of ALK as a major familial neuroblastoma predisposition gene. Nature. 2008;455(7215):930-935.
  62. Wang M, Zhou C, Sun Q, et al. ALK amplification and protein expression predict inferior prognosis in neuroblastomas. Exp Mol Pathol. 2013;95(2):124-130.
  63. Duijkers FA, Gaal J, Meijerink JP, et al. High anaplastic lymphoma kinase immunohistochemical staining in neuroblastoma and ganglioneuroblastoma is an independent predictor of poor outcome. Am J Pathol. 2012;180(3):1223-1231.
  64. Hiyama E, Hiyama K, Ohtsu K, et al. Telomerase activity in neuroblastoma: is it a prognostic indicator of clinical behaviour? Eur J Cancer. 1997;33(12):1932-1936.
  65. Hertwig F, Peifer M, Fischer M. Telomere maintenance is pivotal for high-risk neuroblastoma. Cell Cycle. 2016;15(3):311-312.
  66. Ackermann S, Cartolano M, Hero B, et al. A mechanistic classification of clinical phenotypes in neuroblastoma. Science. 2018;362(6419):1165-1170.
  67. Kurihara S, Hiyama E, Onitake Y, Yamaoka E, Hiyama K. Clinical features of ATRX or DAXX mutated neuroblastoma. J Pediatr Surg. 2014;49(12):1835-1838.

MeSH Term

Adolescent
Adult
Age of Onset
Biomarkers, Tumor
Disease Susceptibility
Female
Gene Dosage
Gene Rearrangement
Genetic Predisposition to Disease
High-Throughput Nucleotide Sequencing
Humans
Immunohistochemistry
In Situ Hybridization, Fluorescence
Male
Neuroblastoma
Telomere Homeostasis
Young Adult

Chemicals

Biomarkers, Tumor

Word Cloud

Created with Highcharts 10.0.0casesneuroblastomamolecularshowedtumorchildhoodadultsbiologyFISHtelomeresgeneticlesscharacterizationseventumorsdifferentiatedexpressedALKoneMYCNamplificationfiveATRXalternatelengtheningTERThighadult-onsetpediatricagegroupWhereascommonextracranialsolid5%occurPediatricshowsmarkedheterogeneityhistologyInformationlimitedespeciallyregardingreportseriesninediagnosedadulthood1840 yearsoldbiologicSchwannianstroma-poormostlypoorlyTumorsneuralmarkersincludingPHOX2BNB84synaptophysinchromograninCD56neuron-specificenolasePGP95TwosixF1174 LmutationreportedFluorescentsituhybridizationrevealed2/7chromosome1pdeletion1/517qgain4/4OnelossexpressionimmunohistochemistryZerorearrangementgenecaselevelconclusionmorphologyimmunophenotypesimilaralthoughSimilarlyalterationsuniqueHowever80%testedchangespromotemaintenancemarkerriskmayhelpexplainpoorresponsetreatmentprotocolsAdditionalstudiescharacterizeadultwillfacilitatedesignpersonalizedtherapeuticapproachesAdult-onsetneuroblastoma:Report

Similar Articles

Cited By (5)