Interaction Effects of Behavioral Inhibition System/Behavioral Activation System and Cost/Probability Biases on Social Anxiety.

Risa Ito, Natsuki Kobayashi, Satoshi Yokoyama, Haruna Irino, Yui Takebayashi, Shin-Ichi Suzuki
Author Information
  1. Risa Ito: Graduate School of Human Sciences, Waseda University, Saitama, Japan.
  2. Natsuki Kobayashi: School of Human Sciences, Waseda University, Saitama, Japan.
  3. Satoshi Yokoyama: Graduate School of Biomedical and Health Sciences, Hiroshima University, Hiroshima, Japan.
  4. Haruna Irino: Akasaka Clinic, Warakukai Medical Corporation, Tokyo, Japan.
  5. Yui Takebayashi: Department of Disaster Psychiatry, School of Medicine, Fukushima Medical University, Fukushima, Japan.
  6. Shin-Ichi Suzuki: Faculty of Human Sciences, Waseda University, Saitama, Japan.

Abstract

INTRODUCTION: Social anxiety disorder (SAD) symptoms are maintained by cognitive biases, which are overestimations of the severity and likelihood of negative social events (cost/probability biases), and by sensitivity to rewards and punishments that are determined according to behavioral inhibition/behavioral activation systems (BIS/BAS). Cost/probability biases might activate the behavioral immune system and exacerbate the avoidance of social events. Earlier studies have proposed that low BIS or high BAS decrease SAD symptoms; BIS/BAS may even change the effects of cognitive biases on SAD symptoms. Hence, the current study investigates the interaction effects of BIS/BAS and cost/probability biases on SAD symptoms.
METHOD: Seventy-six Japanese undergraduate students completed the Japanese version of the Liebowitz Social Anxiety Scale (LSAS), which comprises Fear and Avoidance subscales, the BIS/BAS Scale, and the Social Cost Probability Scale.
RESULTS: A multiple regression analysis was performed to examine whether cost/probability biases, BIS/BAS, and their interactions affected SAD symptoms; following this, the main effects of cost bias and BIS were determined for LSAS-Fear (β = 0.64, < 0.001; β = 0.33, < 0.01) and LSAS-Avoidance (β = 0.49, < 0.001; β = 0.35, < 0.01). The interaction effect between cost bias and BAS was significant for LSAS-Avoidance (β = -0.32, < 0.05). Simple slope analysis showed that the slope of cost bias was significant for low-BAS individuals (β = 0.77, < 0.001) but not for high-BAS individuals (β = -0.21, ). The interaction effect between probability bias and BAS was significant for LSAS-Avoidance (β = 0.40, < 0.01) as well. Further, simple slope analysis revealed that the slope of probability bias was significant for low-BAS individuals (β = -0.53, < 0.05) but not for high-BAS individuals (β = 0.17, ).
DISCUSSION: The study found interesting results with respect to the avoidance of social events. Low-BAS individuals with high cost or low probability biases regarding social events may have a tendency to avoid social events. In contrast, if high-BAS individuals overestimate the cost of social events or underestimate the probability of social events, their anticipation of rewards might prevent them from avoiding social events.

Keywords

References

  1. Clin Psychol Rev. 2008 Apr;28(4):592-612 [PMID: 17959288]
  2. Behav Ther. 2016 Sep;47(5):669-674 [PMID: 27816079]
  3. J Behav Ther Exp Psychiatry. 2008 Jun;39(2):147-61 [PMID: 17433252]
  4. Behav Ther. 2006 Jun;37(2):181-9 [PMID: 16942970]
  5. Cogn Behav Ther. 2007;36(4):193-209 [PMID: 18049945]
  6. Mod Probl Pharmacopsychiatry. 1987;22:141-73 [PMID: 2885745]
  7. Behav Res Ther. 1970 Aug;8(3):249-66 [PMID: 5470377]
  8. Shinrigaku Kenkyu. 2010 Oct;81(4):381-7 [PMID: 21061508]
  9. J Anxiety Disord. 2008 Oct;22(7):1205-13 [PMID: 18282686]

Word Cloud

Created with Highcharts 10.0.00β=socialbiasesevents<costbiasindividualsSADsymptomsBIS/BASprobabilitySocialbehavioralsignificantslopecost/probabilitysystemBASeffectsinteractionScaleanalysis00101LSAS-Avoidance-0high-BASanxietycognitiverewardsdeterminedactivationmightavoidancelowBIShighmaystudyJapaneseAnxietyeffect05low-BASINTRODUCTION:disordermaintainedoverestimationsseveritylikelihoodnegativesensitivitypunishmentsaccordinginhibition/behavioralsystemsCost/probabilityactivateimmuneexacerbateEarlierstudiesproposeddecreaseevenchangeHencecurrentinvestigatesMETHOD:Seventy-sixundergraduatestudentscompletedversionLiebowitzLSAScomprisesFearAvoidancesubscalesCostProbabilityRESULTS:multipleregressionperformedexaminewhetherinteractionsaffectedfollowingmainLSAS-Fear6433493532Simpleshowed772140wellsimplerevealed5317DISCUSSION:foundinterestingresultsrespectLow-BASregardingtendencyavoidcontrastoverestimateunderestimateanticipationpreventavoidingInteractionEffectsBehavioralInhibitionSystem/BehavioralActivationSystemCost/ProbabilityBiasesinhibition

Similar Articles

Cited By