The Assessment of the Supply of Calcium and Vitamin D in the Diet of Women Regularly Practicing Sport.

Micha�� Wrzosek, Jakub Wo��niak, Dorota Kozio��-Kaczorek, Dariusz W��odarek
Author Information
  1. Micha�� Wrzosek: Department of Dietetics, Faculty of Human Nutrition and Consumer Sciences, Warsaw University of Life Sciences (WULS-SGGW), Nowoursynowska 159 C, 02-776 Warsaw, Poland. ORCID
  2. Jakub Wo��niak: Department of Dietetics, Faculty of Human Nutrition and Consumer Sciences, Warsaw University of Life Sciences (WULS-SGGW), Nowoursynowska 159 C, 02-776 Warsaw, Poland. ORCID
  3. Dorota Kozio��-Kaczorek: Departments of Agricultural Economics and International Economic Relations, Faculty of Economic Sciences, Warsaw University of Life Sciences (WULS-SGGW), Nowoursynowska 159 C, 02-776 Warsaw, Poland.
  4. Dariusz W��odarek: Department of Dietetics, Faculty of Human Nutrition and Consumer Sciences, Warsaw University of Life Sciences (WULS-SGGW), Nowoursynowska 159 C, 02-776 Warsaw, Poland.

Abstract

INTRODUCTION: The appropriate intake of calcium and vitamin D in women's diet is significant for a proper maintenance of the skeletal system.
RESEARCH AIM: The aim of the research was to assess the calcium and vitamin D supply in a diet among women regularly practicing sport.
METHODOLOGY: The research was completed by 593 women at the age of 18-50 (median 25) who played sports regularly (at least 2 times a week). To assess the calcium and vitamin D intake, short Food Frequency Questionnaires for calcium and vitamin D (VIDEO-FFQ) were used. The examined group was provided with the questionnaires via social media. To assess intake levels, the authors applied the group-based cutoff point method (calcium norm was EAR 800���mg/day; vitamin D norm was AI 15���g/day).
RESULTS: The median of calcium and vitamin D intake in a diet was 502���mg/day and 5.2���g/day, respectively (Q25 and Q75 for calcium was 387���mg/day and 627���mg/day, respectively, and for vitamin D was 3.4���g/day and 8.2���g/day, respectively). In relation to the EAR norm for calcium and AI norm for vitamin D, 92.0% of the examined participants in a group demonstrated lower than recommended calcium intake levels and 97.3% showed lower than recommended vitamin D intake levels. Calcium and vitamin D supplementation was used by 13.1% (in this subgroup, 11.5% of the examined group members did not need it) and 56.8% of the examined women (in this subgroup, 2.4% of the examined group did not need it), respectively. After including the calcium and vitamin D intake, the supply median for the whole group was 535���mg/day and 28.8���g/day, respectively (Q25 and Q75 for calcium was 402���mg/day and 671���mg/day, and for vitamin D was 6.3���g/day and 55.7���g/day, respectively); 87.5% of the examined participants did not meet the EAR norms for calcium and 42.0% did not meet the AI norm for vitamin D. Among the women supplementing calcium, 58.9% did not reach the reference intake value; however, all women supplementing vitamin D fulfilled the expected nutritional need.
CONCLUSIONS: It is important to educate women about the necessity to provide the body with proper calcium and vitamin D intake levels in a diet in order to avoid health problems resulting from the deficit of the nutrients.

References

  1. Osteoporos Int. 2006;17(3):337-47 [PMID: 16331359]
  2. Proc Nutr Soc. 2003 Nov;62(4):851-8 [PMID: 15018485]
  3. Int J Sport Nutr Exerc Metab. 2016 Dec;26(6):558-564 [PMID: 27097322]
  4. Calcif Tissue Int. 1994 Jul;55(1):59-67 [PMID: 7922791]
  5. Int J Sport Nutr Exerc Metab. 2016 Oct;26(5):397-403 [PMID: 26696653]
  6. Am J Clin Nutr. 2010 Sep;92(3):652-9 [PMID: 20610635]
  7. Med Sci Sports Exerc. 2007 Oct;39(10):1867-82 [PMID: 17909417]
  8. Nutrients. 2018 Sep 10;10(9): [PMID: 30201901]
  9. Med Sci Sports Exerc. 1999 May;31(5):646-52 [PMID: 10331882]
  10. Osteoporos Int. 2010 Jan;21(1):179-82 [PMID: 19387763]
  11. Bone. 2006 Feb;38(2):227-33 [PMID: 16257279]
  12. J Am Diet Assoc. 2006 Jul;106(7):1095-101 [PMID: 16815126]
  13. Curr Aging Sci. 2018;11(1):4-9 [PMID: 28925889]
  14. J Pediatr. 2001 Oct;139(4):509-15 [PMID: 11598596]
  15. Rocz Panstw Zakl Hig. 2008;59(1):75-82 [PMID: 18666625]
  16. Lancet. 2001 Oct 13;358(9289):1208-12 [PMID: 11675056]
  17. Nutrients. 2016 Jan 05;8(1): [PMID: 26742070]
  18. J Rheumatol. 1992 Nov;19(11):1759-63 [PMID: 1491398]
  19. J Sports Sci. 2004 Jan;22(1):95-113 [PMID: 14971436]
  20. Calcif Tissue Int. 2001 Jan;68(1):23-30 [PMID: 12037620]
  21. Osteoporos Int. 1998;8(2):165-73 [PMID: 9666941]
  22. J Am Diet Assoc. 2010 Apr;110(4):498 [PMID: 20338270]
  23. Rocz Panstw Zakl Hig. 2014;65(1):35-9 [PMID: 24964577]
  24. Free Radic Biol Med. 2016 Sep;98:144-158 [PMID: 26855422]
  25. Endocr Rev. 2008 Oct;29(6):726-76 [PMID: 18694980]
  26. Bone. 2007 Jan;40(1):200-4 [PMID: 16950669]
  27. Public Health Nutr. 2014 Feb;17(2):383-9 [PMID: 23217270]
  28. Calcif Tissue Int. 1996 Dec;59(6):438-42 [PMID: 8939768]
  29. J Bone Miner Res. 1998 Mar;13(3):500-7 [PMID: 9525351]
  30. Evid Rep Technol Assess (Full Rep). 2007 Aug;(158):1-235 [PMID: 18088161]
  31. J Am Coll Nutr. 2000 Apr;19(2 Suppl):83S-99S [PMID: 10759135]
  32. Eur J Clin Nutr. 2016 Sep;70(9):1009-14 [PMID: 27460266]
  33. Endokrynol Pol. 2013;64(4):319-27 [PMID: 24002961]
  34. Int J Sport Nutr Exerc Metab. 2000 Sep;10(3):290-301 [PMID: 10997953]
  35. Osteoporos Int. 2003 Oct;14(10):843-7 [PMID: 12904837]
  36. J Bone Miner Metab. 2015 Nov;33(6):658-65 [PMID: 25300746]
  37. Ann Saudi Med. 2011 Nov-Dec;31(6):602-8 [PMID: 22048506]
  38. Am J Clin Nutr. 2016 Apr;103(4):1033-44 [PMID: 26864360]

Word Cloud

Created with Highcharts 10.0.0DvitamincalciumintakewomenexaminedrespectivelygroupnormdietlevelsassessmedianEARAIneedproperresearchsupplyregularly2used2���g/dayQ25Q750%participantslowerrecommendedCalciumsubgroup5%meetsupplementingINTRODUCTION:appropriatewomen'ssignificantmaintenanceskeletalsystemRESEARCHAIM:aimamongpracticingsportMETHODOLOGY:completed593age18-5025playedsportsleasttimesweekshortFoodFrequencyQuestionnairesVIDEO-FFQprovidedquestionnairesviasocialmediaauthorsappliedgroup-basedcutoffpointmethod800���mg/day15���g/dayRESULTS:502���mg/day5387���mg/day627���mg/day34���g/day8relation92demonstrated973%showedsupplementation131%11members568%4%includingwhole535���mg/day288���g/day402���mg/day671���mg/day63���g/day557���g/day87norms42Among589%reachreferencevaluehoweverfulfilledexpectednutritionalCONCLUSIONS:importanteducatenecessityprovidebodyorderavoidhealthproblemsresultingdeficitnutrientsAssessmentSupplyVitaminDietWomenRegularlyPracticingSport

Similar Articles

Cited By