Glacier Calving in Greenland.

Douglas I Benn, Tom Cowton, Joe Todd, Adrian Luckman
Author Information
  1. Douglas I Benn: 1School of Geography and Sustainable Development, University of St Andrews, St Andrews, KY16 9AL UK. ORCID
  2. Tom Cowton: 1School of Geography and Sustainable Development, University of St Andrews, St Andrews, KY16 9AL UK.
  3. Joe Todd: 1School of Geography and Sustainable Development, University of St Andrews, St Andrews, KY16 9AL UK.
  4. Adrian Luckman: 2Department of Geography, Swansea University, Swansea, SA2 8PP UK.

Abstract

In combination, the breakaway of icebergs (calving) and submarine melting at marine-terminating glaciers account for between one third and one half of the mass annually discharged from the Greenland Ice Sheet into the ocean. These ice losses are increasing due to glacier acceleration and retreat, largely in response to increased heat flux from the oceans. Behaviour of Greenland's marine-terminating ('tidewater') glaciers is strongly influenced by fjord bathymetry, particularly the presence of 'pinning points' (narrow or shallow parts of fjords that encourage stability) and over-deepened basins (that encourage rapid retreat). Despite the importance of calving and submarine melting and significant advances in monitoring and understanding key processes, it is not yet possible to predict the tidewater glacier response to climatic and oceanic forcing with any confidence. The simple calving laws required for ice-sheet models do not adequately represent the complexity of calving processes. New detailed process models, however, are increasing our understanding of the key processes and are guiding the design of improved calving laws. There is thus some prospect of reaching the elusive goal of accurately predicting future tidewater glacier behaviour and associated rates of sea-level rise.

Keywords

References

  1. Nat Commun. 2015 Oct 09;6:8566 [PMID: 26450063]
  2. Nature. 2013 Dec 5;504(7478):36-43 [PMID: 24305146]
  3. Nature. 2013 May 9;497(7448):235-8 [PMID: 23657350]
  4. J Geophys Res Earth Surf. 2015 Jun;120(6):964-982 [PMID: 27570721]
  5. Geophys Res Lett. 2015 Jul 28;42(14):5909-5917 [PMID: 31031446]
  6. Science. 2015 Dec 11;350(6266):1357-61 [PMID: 26563135]
  7. Proc Math Phys Eng Sci. 2014 Jun 8;470(2166):20130662 [PMID: 24910517]
  8. Science. 2006 Feb 17;311(5763):986-90 [PMID: 16484490]
  9. Science. 2015 Jul 17;349(6245):305-8 [PMID: 26113640]
  10. Oceanography (Wash D C). 2016 Dec;29(4):46-61 [PMID: 32818012]

Word Cloud

Created with Highcharts 10.0.0calvingGreenlandglacierprocessesmodelssubmarinemeltingmarine-terminatingglaciersoneIceincreasingretreatresponseencourageunderstandingkeytidewaterlawscombinationbreakawayicebergsaccountthirdhalfmassannuallydischargedSheetoceanicelossesdueaccelerationlargelyincreasedheatfluxoceansBehaviourGreenland's'tidewater'stronglyinfluencedfjordbathymetryparticularlypresence'pinningpoints'narrowshallowpartsfjordsstabilityover-deepenedbasinsrapidDespiteimportancesignificantadvancesmonitoringyetpossiblepredictclimaticoceanicforcingconfidencesimplerequiredice-sheetadequatelyrepresentcomplexityNewdetailedprocesshoweverguidingdesignimprovedthusprospectreachingelusivegoalaccuratelypredictingfuturebehaviourassociatedratessea-levelriseGlacierCalvingsheetIceberg

Similar Articles

Cited By (3)