Removal of Soil Microbes Alters Interspecific Competitiveness of ë Endophyte-Infected over Endophyte-Free .

Hui Liu, Jing Chen, Tianzi Qin, Xinjian Shi, Yubao Gao, Anzhi Ren
Author Information
  1. Hui Liu: College of Life Sciences, Nankai University, Tianjin 300071, China.
  2. Jing Chen: College of Life Sciences, Nankai University, Tianjin 300071, China.
  3. Tianzi Qin: College of Life Sciences, Nankai University, Tianjin 300071, China.
  4. Xinjian Shi: College of Life Sciences, Nankai University, Tianjin 300071, China.
  5. Yubao Gao: College of Life Sciences, Nankai University, Tianjin 300071, China.
  6. Anzhi Ren: College of Life Sciences, Nankai University, Tianjin 300071, China.

Abstract

Epichloë endophytes may not only affect the growth and resistances of host grasses, but may also affect soil environment including soil microbes. Can Epichloë endophyte-mediated modification of soil microbes affect the competitive ability of host grasses? In this study, we tested whether Epichloë endophytes and soil microbes alter intraspecific competition between Epichloë endophyte-colonized (EI) and endophyte-free (EF) and interspecific competition between and . The results demonstrated that Epichloë endophyte colonization significantly enhanced the intraspecific competitive ability of and that this beneficial effect was not affected by soil microbes. Under interspecific competition, however, significant interactions between Epichloë endophytes and soil microbes were observed. The effect of Epichloë endophytes on interspecific competitiveness of the host changed from positive to neutral with soil microbe removal. Here higher mycorrhizal colonization rates probably contributed to interspecific competitive advantages of EI over EF . Our result suggests that Epichloë endophytes can influence the competitive ability of the host through plant soil feedbacks from the currently competing plant species.

Keywords

References

  1. New Phytol. 1990 Jul;115(3):495-501 [PMID: 33874272]
  2. FEMS Microbiol Lett. 2013 Mar;340(2):135-45 [PMID: 23330647]
  3. FEMS Microbiol Ecol. 2017 Jun 1;93(6): [PMID: 28334408]
  4. Trends Plant Sci. 2004 Jun;9(6):275-80 [PMID: 15165558]
  5. Ecol Lett. 2018 Aug;21(8):1268-1281 [PMID: 29896848]
  6. Am Nat. 2002 Oct;160 Suppl 4:S99-S127 [PMID: 18707456]
  7. Am J Bot. 2014 Dec;101(12):2068-78 [PMID: 25480704]
  8. Mycorrhiza. 2017 Nov;27(8):791-799 [PMID: 28799077]
  9. Ecology. 2012 Jan;93(1):3-8 [PMID: 22486080]

Grants

  1. 31570433/National Natural Science Foundation of China

Word Cloud

Created with Highcharts 10.0.0EpichloësoilendophytesmicrobescompetitioninterspecifichostcompetitiveaffectabilityintraspecificmayEIEFendophytecolonizationeffectmicrobeplantgrowthresistancesgrassesalsoenvironmentincludingCanendophyte-mediatedmodificationgrasses?studytestedwhetheralterendophyte-colonizedendophyte-freeresultsdemonstratedsignificantlyenhancedbeneficialaffectedhoweversignificantinteractionsobservedcompetitivenesschangedpositiveneutralremovalhighermycorrhizalratesprobablycontributedadvantagesresultsuggestscaninfluencefeedbackscurrentlycompetingspeciesRemovalSoilMicrobesAltersInterspecificCompetitivenessëEndophyte-InfectedEndophyte-FreeLeymuschinensisStipakrylovii

Similar Articles

Cited By