Evidences of the (400 MHz - 3 GHz) radiofrequency electromagnetic field influence on brain tumor induction.

Fernando Pareja-Peña, Antonio M Burgos-Molina, Francisco Sendra-Portero, Miguel J Ruiz-Gómez
Author Information
  1. Fernando Pareja-Peña: Departamento de Radiología y Medicina Física, Facultad de Medicina, Universidad de Málaga, Málaga, España. ORCID
  2. Antonio M Burgos-Molina: Departamento de Radiología y Medicina Física, Facultad de Medicina, Universidad de Málaga, Málaga, España. ORCID
  3. Francisco Sendra-Portero: Departamento de Radiología y Medicina Física, Facultad de Medicina, Universidad de Málaga, Málaga, España. ORCID
  4. Miguel J Ruiz-Gómez: Departamento de Radiología y Medicina Física, Facultad de Medicina, Universidad de Málaga, Málaga, España. ORCID

Abstract

Due to the massive increase in non-ionizing radiation emitting devices, the social concern about the possible malignancy to its exposure has increased the research interest. The International Commission on Non-Ionizing Radiation Protection (ICNIRP) included the radiofrequency electromagnetic field (RF-EMF) of mobile phones on the category 2B as 'possibly' carcinogenic to humans. Epidemiological studies noticed a causal association between the exposure to RF-EMF and the incidence of brain neoplasm in different populations, since this is the organ with the highest specific absorption rate. The fact that so many of the ipsilateral tumors found are statistically significant with RF-EMF exposure provides weight suggesting causality. In this way, the higher the exposure (ipsilateral contralateral), the longer the cumulative exposure (hours of exposure) and the longer the latency (beyond 10 years); the greater the risk. In addition, considering together all of these parameters suggest a strong causality.

Keywords

MeSH Term

Brain Neoplasms
Cell Phone
Electromagnetic Fields
Environmental Exposure
Humans
Radio Waves

Word Cloud

Created with Highcharts 10.0.0exposureelectromagneticfieldRF-EMFbrainradiofrequencymobileipsilateralcausalitylongerDuemassiveincreasenon-ionizingradiationemittingdevicessocialconcernpossiblemalignancyincreasedresearchinterestInternationalCommissionNon-IonizingRadiationProtectionICNIRPincludedphonescategory2B'possibly'carcinogenichumansEpidemiologicalstudiesnoticedcausalassociationincidenceneoplasmdifferentpopulationssinceorganhighestspecificabsorptionratefactmanytumorsfoundstatisticallysignificantprovidesweightsuggestingwayhighercontralateralcumulativehourslatencybeyond10 yearsgreaterriskadditionconsideringtogetherparameterssuggeststrongEvidences400MHz-3GHzinfluencetumorinductionRadiofrequencycancerhumanphone

Similar Articles

Cited By (1)