A Comparative Study of the Role of Interpersonal Communication, Traditional Media and Social Media in Pro-Environmental Behavior: A China-Based Study.

Ruixia Han, Jian Xu
Author Information
  1. Ruixia Han: School of Media and Communication, Shanghai Jiao Tong University, 800 Dongchuan RD, Minhang District, Shanghai 200240, China.
  2. Jian Xu: School of Media and Communication, Shanghai Jiao Tong University, 800 Dongchuan RD, Minhang District, Shanghai 200240, China.

Abstract

Previous studies have confirmed that information exposure affects pro-environmental behavior. With the rise of social media, new questions emerge in terms of whether different types of information exposure affect pro-environmental behavior differently. Based on a survey of 550 people that was carried out in China, this study aims to compare the different roles of interpersonal communication, traditional media, and social media in affecting the relationships between people's environmental risk perception, willingness to contribute to the environment, environmental knowledge, environmental concerns, and pro-environmental behavior. Our research discovered that: (1) traditional media has almost no effect on pro-environmental behavior; (2) interpersonal communication can affect pro-environmental behavior through significantly affecting environmental risk perception; (3) social media affects pro-environmental behavior mainly by strengthening the effects of interpersonal communication. The research reveals that while different types of information exposure affect pro-environmental behavior differently, interpersonal communication plays a central role. Concerning the mutual influence between social media and interpersonal communication, we propose that we could promote pro-environmental behavior by activating social media communication.

Keywords

References

  1. Annu Rev Public Health. 1989;10:95-113 [PMID: 2655644]
  2. Percept Mot Skills. 1996 Oct;83(2):541-62 [PMID: 9036372]
  3. Risk Anal. 1995 Apr;15(2):137-45 [PMID: 7597253]
  4. Annu Rev Psychol. 2001;52:1-26 [PMID: 11148297]
  5. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2019 Dec 13;16(24): [PMID: 31847235]
  6. Int J Psychol. 2014 Jun;49(3):141-57 [PMID: 24821503]
  7. Risk Anal. 2003 Apr;23(2):261-7 [PMID: 12731811]
  8. AIDS Care. 2003 Dec;15(6):749-62 [PMID: 14617497]

MeSH Term

China
Communication
Conservation of Natural Resources
Environment
Humans
Interpersonal Relations
Mass Media
Public Opinion
Social Media
Surveys and Questionnaires

Word Cloud

Created with Highcharts 10.0.0pro-environmentalbehaviormediacommunicationsocialinterpersonalenvironmentalinformationexposuredifferentaffecttraditionalriskperceptionaffectstypesdifferentlyaffectingwillingnesscontributeenvironmentresearcheffectStudyMediaPreviousstudiesconfirmedrisenewquestionsemergetermswhetherBasedsurvey550peoplecarriedChinastudyaimscomparerolesrelationshipspeople'sknowledgeconcernsdiscoveredthat:1almost2cansignificantly3mainlystrengtheningeffectsrevealsplayscentralroleConcerningmutualinfluenceproposepromoteactivatingComparativeRoleInterpersonalCommunicationTraditionalSocialPro-EnvironmentalBehavior:China-Basedmoderating

Similar Articles

Cited By