Prognostic Significance of Lymph Node Status in p16+ Oropharyngeal Cancer After Surgical Treatment.

Young Min Park, Tae Seong Eo, Yoon Woo Koh, Se-Heon Kim, Eun Chang Choi
Author Information
  1. Young Min Park: Department of Otorhinolaryngology, Yonsei University College of Medicine, Gangnam Severance Hospital, Seoul, South Korea. ORCID
  2. Tae Seong Eo: Department of Otorhinolaryngology, Yonsei University College of Medicine, Seoul, South Korea.
  3. Yoon Woo Koh: Department of Otorhinolaryngology, Yonsei University College of Medicine, Seoul, South Korea. ORCID
  4. Se-Heon Kim: Department of Otorhinolaryngology, Yonsei University College of Medicine, Seoul, South Korea. ORCID
  5. Eun Chang Choi: Department of Otorhinolaryngology, Yonsei University College of Medicine, Seoul, South Korea.

Abstract

OBJECTIVES/HYPOTHESIS: In this study, we retrospectively reviewed medical records of patients who underwent surgery for p16+ oropharyngeal cancer and analyzed the prognostic implications of pathologic lymph node (LN) status, including number of metastatic LNs, LN ratio, and location of metastatic LNs.
STUDY DESIGN: Retrospective case series.
METHODS: We retrospectively reviewed data on patients diagnosed with p16+ oropharyngeal cancer.
RESULTS: The study population consisted of 159 males and 29 females with a mean age of 57.2 years. The primary tumor sites were tonsils (n = 160), base of the tongue (n = 24), and soft palate (n = 4). Only recurrence-free survival (RFS) showed a significant correlation with contralateral LN metastasis on multivariate analysis. On Kaplan-Meier analysis, 5-year RFS was 92.4% in patients without contralateral LN metastasis and 68.8% in patients with contralateral LN metastasis.
CONCLUSIONS: Among pathologic LN status in p16+ oropharyngeal cancer, only contralateral LN metastasis showed prognostic significance in disease recurrence of p16+ oropharyngeal squamous cell carcinoma patients.
LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: 4 Laryngoscope, 130: 1973-1979, 2020.

Keywords

References

  1. Takes RP, Rinaldo A, Silver CE, et al. Future of the TNM classification and staging system in head and neck cancer. Head Neck 2010;32:1693-1711.
  2. Gődény M. Prognostic factors in advanced pharyngeal and oral cavity cancer; significance of multimodality imaging in terms of 7th edition of TNM. Cancer Imaging 2014;14:15.
  3. Patel SG, Shah JP. TNM staging of cancers of the head and neck: striving for uniformity among diversity. CA Cancer J Clin 2005;55:242-258.
  4. Lydiatt WM, Patel SG, O'Sullivan B, et al. Head and neck cancers-major changes in the American joint committee on cancer eighth edition cancer staging manual. CA Cancer J Clin 2017;67:122-137.
  5. Dahlstrom KR, Garden AS, William WN Jr, Lim MY, Sturgis EM. Proposed staging system for patients with HPV-related oropharyngeal cancer based on nasopharyngeal cancer N categories. J Clin Oncol 2016;34:1848-1854.
  6. Mallen-St Clair J, Alani M, Wang MB, Srivatsan ES. Human papillomavirus in oropharyngeal cancer: the changing face of a disease. Biochim Biophys Acta 2016;1866:141-150.
  7. Mendelsohn AH, Lai CK, Shintaku IP, et al. Histopathologic findings of HPV and p16 positive HNSCC. Laryngoscope 2010;120:1788-1794.
  8. Jacobi C, Rauch J, Hagemann J, Lautz T, Reiter M, Baumeister P. Prognostic value of the lymph node ratio in oropharyngeal carcinoma stratified for HPV-status. Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol 2018;275:515-524.
  9. Dahlstrom KR, Calzada G, Hanby JD, et al. An evolution in demographics, treatment, and outcomes of oropharyngeal cancer at a major cancer center: a staging system in need of repair. Cancer 2013;119:81-89.
  10. Ward MJ, Mellows T, Harris S, et al. Staging and treatment of oropharyngeal cancer in the human papillomavirus era. Head Neck 2015;37:1002-1013.
  11. Huang SH, Xu W, Waldron J, et al. Refining American joint committee on cancer/Union for International Cancer Control TNM stage and prognostic groups for human papillomavirus-related oropharyngeal carcinomas. J Clin Oncol 2015;33:836-845.
  12. Zaravinos A. An updated overview of HPV-associated head and neck carcinomas. Oncotarget 2014;5:3956-3969.
  13. Miccio JA, Verma V, Kelly J, et al. Impact of contralateral lymph nodal involvement and extranodal extension on survival of surgically managed HPV-positive oropharyngeal cancer staged with the AJCC eighth edition. Oral Oncol 2019;99:104447.
  14. Kato MG, Ellis MA, Nguyen SA, Day TA. Predictors of contralateral-bilateral nodal disease in oropharyngeal cancer: a National Cancer Data Base Study. Head Neck 2018;40:338-348.
  15. McMullen CP, Garneau J, Weimar E, et al. Occult contralateral nodal disease in oropharyngeal squamous cell carcinoma patients undergoing primary TORS with bilateral neck dissection. Oral Oncol 2019;93:96-100.
  16. Reinisch S, Kruse A, Bredell M, Lübbers HT, Gander T, Lanzer M. Is lymph-node ratio a superior predictor than lymph node status for recurrence-free and overall survival in patients with head and neck squamous cell carcinoma? Ann Surg Oncol 2014;21:1912-1918.
  17. Künzel J, Psychogios G, Mantsopoulos K, Grundtner P, Waldfahrer F, Iro H. Lymph node ratio as a predictor of outcome in patients with oropharyngeal cancer. Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol 2014;271:1171-1180.
  18. Trosman SJ, Koyfman SA, Ward MC, et al. Effect of human papillomavirus on patterns of distant metastatic failure in oropharyngeal squamous cell carcinoma treated with chemoradiotherapy. JAMA Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 2015;141:457-462.
  19. Sinha P, Lewis JS Jr, Piccirillo JF, Kallogjeri D, Haughey BH. Extracapsular spread and adjuvant therapy in human papillomavirus-related, p16-positive oropharyngeal carcinoma. Cancer 2012;118:3519-3530.
  20. Shevach J, Bossert A, Bakst RL, et al. Extracapsular extension is associated with worse distant control and progression-free survival in patients with lymph node-positive human papillomavirus-related oropharyngeal carcinoma. Oral Oncol 2017;74:56-61.
  21. Ballantyne AJ. Significance of retropharyngeal nodes in cancer of the head and neck. Am J Surg 1964;108:500-504.
  22. Hasegawa Y, Matsuura H. Retropharyngeal node dissection in cancer of the oropharynx and hypopharynx. Head Neck 1994;16:173-180.
  23. Lin TA, Garden AS, Elhalawani H, et al. Radiographic retropharyngeal lymph node involvement in human papillomavirus-associated oropharyngeal carcinoma: patterns of involvement and impact on patient outcomes. Cancer 2019;125:1536-1546.

MeSH Term

Adult
Aged
Aged, 80 and over
Carcinoma, Squamous Cell
Female
Humans
Lymphatic Metastasis
Male
Middle Aged
Neoplasm Staging
Oropharyngeal Neoplasms
Prognosis
Retrospective Studies

Word Cloud

Created with Highcharts 10.0.0LNpatientsp16+oropharyngealmetastasiscontralateralcancern=studyretrospectivelyreviewedprognosticpathologicstatusmetastaticLNs4RFSshowedanalysiscarcinomaOBJECTIVES/HYPOTHESIS:medicalrecordsunderwentsurgeryanalyzedimplicationslymphnodeincludingnumberratiolocationSTUDYDESIGN:RetrospectivecaseseriesMETHODS:datadiagnosedRESULTS:populationconsisted159males29femalesmeanage572 yearsprimarytumorsitestonsils160basetongue24softpalaterecurrence-freesurvivalsignificantcorrelationmultivariateKaplan-Meier5-year924%without688%CONCLUSIONS:AmongsignificancediseaserecurrencesquamouscellLEVELOFEVIDENCE:Laryngoscope130:1973-19792020PrognosticSignificanceLymphNodeStatusOropharyngealCancerSurgicalTreatmentHumanpapillomavirusprognosis

Similar Articles

Cited By (2)