Transitioning Knowledge Levels Through Problem Solving Methods.

Νikolaos Sampanis
Author Information
  1. Νikolaos Sampanis: Hellenic Open University, Patras, Greece. c18saba@ionio.gr.

Abstract

Problem solving is one of the most important goals of mathematics teaching. Several researches, such as the one attached to this dissertation, demonstrate that the problems of mathematics and their resolution are ultimately a problem for the majority of students. The very low performance for pupils in our 15-year-old country in the PISA international competition, coupled with references to problem solving research, demonstrates the weakness of our country's education system to bridge the gap between school reality and everyday problems or original problems. In contrast to the unpleasant results of the mathematical problem solving research, several theories in the science of mathematics teaching describe problem solving methods, such as Polya's method of questioning, which help the student develop the thinking skills he/she has, his/her metacognostic abilities, and above all he/she can raise a level of knowledge in relation to what he/she is before dealing with problem solving. Key findings of the research are that there is no absolute link between pupils' skills in solving original problems and answers to the problems of school reality. However, the questionnaire method we applied in the second phase of the survey has shown to deliver. The students found the value of the method in solving a problem by correcting errors or shortcomings and eventually answering correctly. Methods and research on them, however, present the way to acquiring mathematical knowledge through problems. For safer conclusions, we expect as a learning community the results of research in cognitive science and neuroscience around problem solving. The last two areas of educational research, cognitive science and neuro-education, are expected to provide answers for the transition of knowledge from one level to another.

Keywords

References

  1. Ackoff RL (1978) The art of problem solving: accompanied by Ackoff’s fables. Wiley, New York
  2. Anastasios M (1999) The SOLO taxonomy (Structure of the Observed Learning Outcome) and its applications in mathematical education. A modern learning theory with enormous research and evaluation potential. Panhellenic conference on mathematical education (16), pp 88–98
  3. Bosniadou S (1998) The psychology of mathematics. Gutenberg, Athens
  4. Buxkemper AC, Hartfiel DJ (2003) Understanding. Int J Math Educ Sci Technol 34(6):801–812 [DOI: 10.1080/00207390310001595555]
  5. Creswell J (2016) Research in education. ION, Athens
  6. Damianos C (2006) Sampling methodology. Techniques and applications. Sophia, Thessaloniki
  7. Dubinsky E, McDonald MA (2001) APOS: a constructivist theory of learning in undergraduate mathematics education research. In: The teaching and learning of mathematics at university level. Springer, Dordrecht, pp 275–282
  8. Εnglish LD (1997) Interventions in children’s deductive reasoning with inderminate problems. Contemp Educ Psychol 22:338–362.
  9. English LD (1998) Children’s problem posing within formal and informal contexts. J Res Math Educ 29:83–106
  10. English L, Sriraman B (2010) Problem solving for the 21st century. In: Theories of mathematics education. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg, pp 263–290 [DOI: 10.1007/978-3-642-00742-2_27]
  11. English LD (1997) The development of fifth-grade children’s problem-posing abilities. Educational studies in Mathematics 34(3):183–217
  12. English LD, Fox JL, Watters JJ (2005) Problem posing and solving with mathematical modeling. Teach Child Math 12(3):156 [DOI: 10.5951/TCM.12.3.0156]
  13. English LD, Lesh R, Fennewald T (2008) Future directions and perspectives for problem solving research and curriculum development. In Proceedings of the 11th International Congress on Mathematical Education
  14. Flavell JH (1976) Metacognitive aspects of problem solving. In: The nature of intelligence. Erlbaum, Hillsdale, pp 231–235
  15. Flavell JH (1979) Metacognition and cognitive monitoring: a new area of cognitive– developmental inquiry. Am Psychol 34(10):906 [DOI: 10.1037/0003-066X.34.10.906]
  16. Henderson KB, Pingry RE (1953) Problem solving in mathematics. The learning of mathematics: its theory and practice, 228-270. 16. Schoenfeld AH (1992) Learning to think mathematically: problem solving, metacognition, and sense making in mathematics. In: Handbook of research on mathematics teaching and learning. Μacmillan, New York, pp 334–368
  17. Kapsalis A, Lemonides Ch (1999) Modern trends in the teaching of mathematics. MAKEDON, Periodical Scientific Edition of the Pedagogical School of Florina, AUTh. Issue 6, pp 95–115
  18. Kilpatrick J (1985) A retrospective account of the past 25 years of research on teaching mathematical problem solving. Teaching and learning mathematical problem solving: Multiple research perspectives, 1–15
  19. Makrygiannis A, Makrigiannis S (2014) Three worlds of mathematics teaching: a new framework for teaching mathematics. A’- Technology and Sciences (1):1–11
  20. Mamonas-Downs G, Papadopoulos I (2017) Problem solving in mathematics. University Publications of Crete, Heraklion
  21. Mohd TNA, Chinnappan M (2015) Exploring relationship between scientific reasoning skills and mathematics problem solving
  22. Panagiotopoulos S, Tzoumas M (2010) Conic sections: source of ideas for the problem – posing of Euclidean Geometry
  23. Paraskevopoulos PN, Arvanitis KG (1993) State feedback uniform decoupling problem of linear time-varying analytic systems. Journal of the Franklin Institute 330(6):1135–1163
  24. PISA (2003) Problem solving for tomorrow’s world. Organisation for Economic Co – operation and Development
  25. Polya G (1991) FOR LISO (Matt Patronis T.). Kardamitsa Publications, Athens
  26. Rott B (2013) Process regulation in the problem-solving processes of fifth graders. CEPS Journal: Center for Educational. Policy Studies Journal 3(4):25
  27. Skemp RR (1976) Relational understanding and instrumental understanding. Math Teach 77(1):20–26
  28. Tall D (1999) Reflections on APOS theory in elementary and advanced mathematical thinking. In: Proceedings of the 23rd conference of the International Group for the psychology of mathematics education, Vol. 1, pp 148–155
  29. Thom JS, Pirie SE (2002) Problems, perseverance, and mathematical residue. Educ Stud Math 50(1):1–28 [DOI: 10.1023/A]
  30. Vadivoulis N (1984) The mathematical thinking of the adolescent through the mathematical problem. In: Proceedings of the 1st Panhellenic conference of mathematical education, Athens, pp 174–182
  31. Vosniadou S (2002) Cognitive science: the new science of the mind. University of Athens, Athens
  32. Weiss IR (1978) Report of the 1977 national survey of science, mathematics, and social studies education. Final Report
  33. Zanzali NAA, Lui LN (2000) Evaluating the levels of problem solving abilities in mathematics. Universiti Teknologi Malaysia

MeSH Term

Female
Humans
Knowledge
Learning
Male
Mathematics
Problem Solving
Teaching
Thinking

Word Cloud

Created with Highcharts 10.0.0solvingproblemproblemsresearchknowledgeProblemonemathematicssciencemethodskillshe/sheMethodsteachingstudentsPISAschoolrealityoriginalresultsmathematicallevelanswerscognitiveLevelsimportantgoalsSeveralresearchesattacheddissertationdemonstrateresolutionultimatelymajoritylowperformancepupils15-year-oldcountryinternationalcompetitioncoupledreferencesdemonstratesweaknesscountry'seducationsystembridgegapeverydaycontrastunpleasantseveraltheoriesdescribemethodsPolya'squestioninghelpstudentdevelopthinkinghis/hermetacognosticabilitiescanraiserelationdealingKeyfindingsabsolutelinkpupils'Howeverquestionnaireappliedsecondphasesurveyshowndeliverfoundvaluecorrectingerrorsshortcomingseventuallyansweringcorrectlyhoweverpresentwayacquiringsaferconclusionsexpectlearningcommunityneurosciencearoundlasttwoareaseducationalneuro-educationexpectedprovidetransitionanotherTransitioningKnowledgeSolvingCognitivereasoning

Similar Articles

Cited By

No available data.