The use of multiscale stressors with biological condition assessments: A framework to advance the assessment and management of streams.

Luisa Riato, Scott G Leibowitz, Marc H Weber
Author Information
  1. Luisa Riato: Oak Ridge Institute for Science and Education (ORISE) Post-Doctoral Fellow c/o U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Center for Public Health and Environmental Assessment, Pacific Ecological Systems Division, 200 SW 35th St., Corvallis, OR 97333, USA. Electronic address: riato.luisa@epa.gov.
  2. Scott G Leibowitz: U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Center for Public Health and Environmental Assessment, Pacific Ecological Systems Division, 200 SW 35th St., Corvallis, OR 97333, USA. Electronic address: leibowitz.scott@epa.gov.
  3. Marc H Weber: U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Center for Public Health and Environmental Assessment, Pacific Ecological Systems Division, 200 SW 35th St., Corvallis, OR 97333, USA. Electronic address: weber.marc@epa.gov.

Abstract

Incorporating information on landscape condition (or integrity) across multiple spatial scales and over large spatial extents in biological assessments may allow for a more integrated measure of stream biological condition and better management of streams. However, these systems are often assessed and managed at an individual scale (e.g., a single watershed) without a larger regional multiscale context. In this paper, our goals were: (1) To develop a conceptual framework that could combine stream biological condition to abiotic landscape integrity (or, conversely, stressor) data at three spatial scales: watershed, catchment and stream-reach scale, to enable more targeted management actions. Measures of landscape integrity and stressors are negatively related, i.e., integrity on a 0-1 scale is equal or equivalent to stressors on a 1-0 scale. (2) To develop the framework in such a way that allows operational flexibility, whereby different indicators can be used to represent biological condition, and landscape integrity (or stressors) at various scales. (3) To provide different examples of the framework's use to demonstrate the flexibility of its application and relevance to management. Examples include stream biological assessments from different regions and states across the U.S. for fish, macroinvertebrates and diatoms using a variety of assessment tools (e.g., the Biological Condition Gradient (BCG), and an Index of Biotic Integrity (IBI)). Landscape integrity indicators comprise U.S. EPA's nationally available Index of Watershed Integrity (IWI) and Index of Catchment Integrity (ICI), and state and regional derived watershed and stream-reach scale integrity indicators. Scatterplots and a landscape integrity map were used to relate samples of stream condition classes (e.g., good, fair, poor) to watershed, catchment and stream-reach scale integrity. This framework and approach could provide a powerful tool for prioritizing, targeting, and communicating management actions to protect and restore stream habitats, and for informing the spatial extent at which management is applied.

Keywords

References

  1. Environ Manage. 2014 Dec;54(6):1249-66 [PMID: 25223620]
  2. Ecol Appl. 2006 Aug;16(4):1251-66 [PMID: 16937795]
  3. Environ Toxicol Chem. 2013 Feb;32(2):272-6 [PMID: 23161561]
  4. Springerplus. 2014 Oct 09;3:589 [PMID: 25392769]
  5. Ecol Indic. 2018 Feb 01;85:1133-1148 [PMID: 29628801]
  6. Environ Manage. 2020 May;65(5):602-617 [PMID: 32200409]
  7. Ecol Appl. 2017 Dec;27(8):2397-2415 [PMID: 28871655]
  8. Sci Total Environ. 2016 Aug 15;562:914-927 [PMID: 27128024]
  9. Sci Total Environ. 2019 Feb 15;651(Pt 2):2615-2630 [PMID: 30340196]

Grants

  1. EPA999999/Intramural EPA

MeSH Term

Agriculture
Animals
Ecosystem
Environmental Monitoring
Fishes
Rivers

Word Cloud

Created with Highcharts 10.0.0integrityconditionbiologicalmanagementscalelandscapespatialstreamewatershedframeworkstressorsIndexscalesgstream-reachdifferentindicatorsIntegrityacrossmultipleassessmentsstreamsregionalmultiscaledevelopcatchmentactionsflexibilityusedprovideuseUSassessmentBiologicalWatershedCatchmentIncorporatinginformationlargeextentsmayallowintegratedmeasurebetterHoweversystemsoftenassessedmanagedindividualsinglewithoutlargercontextpapergoalswere:1conceptualcombineabioticconverselystressordatathreescales:enabletargetedMeasuresnegativelyrelatedi0-1equalequivalent1-02wayallowsoperationalwherebycanrepresentvarious3examplesframework'sdemonstrateapplicationrelevanceExamplesincluderegionsstatesfishmacroinvertebratesdiatomsusingvarietytoolsConditionGradientBCGBioticIBILandscapecompriseEPA'snationallyavailableIWIICIstatederivedScatterplotsmaprelatesamplesclassesgoodfairpoorapproachpowerfultoolprioritizingtargetingcommunicatingprotectrestorehabitatsinformingextentappliedassessments:advancegradientbioticStreamStream-reach

Similar Articles

Cited By