OpenLB
Open Library of Bioscience
Advanced Search
Risk analysis : an official publication of the Society for Risk Analysis
11, 2020;40 (S1): 2113-2127.

Risk Analysis: Celebrating the Accomplishments and Embracing Ongoing Challenges.

Michael Greenberg, Anthony Cox, Vicki Bier, Jim Lambert, Karen Lowrie, Warner North, Michael Siegrist, Felicia Wu
Author Information
  1. Michael Greenberg: Edward J. Bloustein School, Rutgers University, New Brunswick, NJ, USA.
  2. Anthony Cox: Cox Associates, Denver, Colorado, USA.
  3. Vicki Bier: University of Wisconsin, Madison, Wisconsin, USA.
  4. Jim Lambert: University of Virginia, Charlottesville, Virginia, USA.
  5. Karen Lowrie: Edward J. Bloustein School, Rutgers University, New Brunswick, NJ, USA.
  6. Warner North: NorthWorks, San Francisco, California, USA.
  7. Michael Siegrist: ETH, Zurich, Switzerland.
  8. Felicia Wu: Michigan State University, East Lansing, Michigan, USA.
PMID: 32579763 DOI: 10.1111/risa.13487

Abstract

As part of the celebration of the 40th anniversary of the Society for Risk Analysis and Risk Analysis: An International Journal, this essay reviews the 10 most important accomplishments of risk analysis from 1980 to 2010, outlines major accomplishments in three major categories from 2011 to 2019, discusses how editors circulate authors' accomplishments, and proposes 10 major risk-related challenges for 2020-2030. Authors conclude that the next decade will severely test the field of risk analysis.

Keywords

Risk analysis risk challenges

References

  1. Alattar, L., Yates, F, Eby, D, Leblanc, D, & Molnar, L. (2016). Understanding and reducing inconsistency in seatbelt-use decisions: Findings from a cardinal decision issue perspective. Risk Analysis, 361, 83-97.
  2. Alderson, D., Brown, G. G., & Caryle, W. M. (2015). Operational models of infrastructure resilience. Risk Analysis, 35(4), 562-586.
  3. Altshuler, C., Holland, D., Hong, P., & Li, H. Y. (2016). The World Economic Forecasting Model at the United Nations. Retrieved from https://www.un.org/development/desa/dpad/wp-content/uploads/sites/45/publication/2016_Apr_WorldEconomicForecastingModel.pdf.
  4. Aven, T. (2019). The call for a shift from risk to resilience: What does it mean? Risk Analysis, 39, 1196-1203.
  5. Aven, T. (2020). The science of risk analysis. NY, Routledge.
  6. Aven, T., Andersen, H. B., Cox, T., Droguett, E. L., Greenberg, M., Guiukema, S., … Zio, E. (2015). Risk Analysis Foundations. Retrieved from https://www.sra.org/sites/default/files/pdf/FoundationsMay7-2015-sent-x.pdf.
  7. Aven, T., & Renn, O. (2012). On the risk management and risk governance for petroleum operations in the Barents Sea area. Risk Analysis, 32, 1561-1575.
  8. Aven, T., & Zio, E. (2014). Foundational issues in risk analysis and risk management. Risk Analysis, 20, 1164-1172.
  9. Berlin, I. (1953). The Hedgehog and Fox: An essay on Tolstoy's view of history. London: Weidenfeld & Nicolson.
  10. Blanco, C., Caro, F., & Corbett, C. (2019). Managing safety-related disruptions: Evidence from the US nuclear power industry. Risk Analysis, 39, 2197-2213.
  11. Bubeck, P., Botzen, W. J. W, & Aerts, J. C. J. H. (2012). A review of risk perceptions and other factors that influence flood mitigation behavior. Risk Analysis, 32, 1481-1495.
  12. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. (1999). 10 great public health achievements-United States, 1900-1999. MMWR, 40, 241-243.
  13. Chiu, M. C, Pun, C. S., & Wong, H. Y. (2017). Big data challenges of high dimensional continuous-time mean-variance portfolio selection and a remedy. Risk Analysis, 37, 1532-1549.
  14. Cirkovic, M. (2012). Small theories and large risks-Is risk analysis relevant for epistemology? Risk Analysis, 32(11), 1994-2004.
  15. Clarke, R., & Knake, R. (2019). The internet freedom league. Foreign Affairs, 98, 184-192.
  16. Cohen, J., & Graham, J. (2003). A revised economic analysis of restrictions on the use of cell phones while driving. Risk Analysis, 23(1), 5-17.
  17. Copp, G. (2013). The Fish Invasiveness Screening Kit (FISK) for non-native freshwater fishes - A summary of current applications, Risk Analysis, 33, 1394-1396.
  18. Dillon, R., Tinsley, C., & Cronin, M. (2011). Why near miss events can decrease an individual's protective response to hurricanes. Risk Analysis, 31, 440-449.
  19. Cumming, R. B. (1981). Is risk assessment a science? Risk Analysis, 1, 1-3.
  20. Eastwood, J., Biffis, E., Hapgood, M., Green, L., Bisi, M., Bentley, R., … Burnett, C. (2017). The economic impact of space weather: Where do we stand? Risk Analysis, 37, 206-218.
  21. Eisenberg, D., Seager, T., & Alderson, D. (2019). Rethinking system resilience. Risk Analysis, 39, 1870-1884.
  22. Evans, L. (1986). Risk homeostasis theory and traffic accident data. Risk Analysis, 6, 81-94.
  23. Farrow, S. (2011). Incorporating equity in regulatory and benefit-cost analysis using risk-based preferences. Risk Analysis, 31, 902-907.
  24. Feuer, E., Levy, D., & McCarthy, W. (2012). The impact of the reduction in tobacco smoking on US lung cancer mortality, 1975-2000: An introduction to the problem. Risk Analysis, 32, S6-S13.
  25. Fullerton, D. (2011). Six distributional effects of environmental policy. Risk Analysis, 31, 923-929.
  26. Greenberg, M., Haas, C., Cox, L. A., Lowrie, K., McComas, K., & North, W. (2012). Ten most important accomplishments in risk analysis, 1980-2010. Risk Analysis, 32, 771-781.
  27. Greenberg, M., Weiner, M., Noland, R., Herb, J., Kaplan, M., & Broccoli, T. (2014). Public support for policies to reduce risk after Hurricane Sandy. Risk Analysis, 34, 997-1012.
  28. Greenberg, M., Apostolakis, G., Fields, T., Goldstein, B., Kosson, D., Matthews, R. B., … Stewart, R. (2019). Advancing risk-informed decision-making in managing defense nuclear waste in the United States: Opportunities and challenges for risk analysis. Risk Analysis, 39, 375-388
  29. Greenberg, M., & Schneider, D. (2017). Urban planning and public health: A critical partnership. Washington, DC: American Public Health Association.
  30. Guikema, S. (2012). Modeling intelligent adversaries for terrorism risk assessment: Some necessary conditions for adversary models. Risk Analysis, 32, 1117-1121.
  31. Haimes, Y. (2012). The teaching preparedness for recovery from catastrophic risks to communities and infrastructure systems of systems. Risk Analysis, 32, 1834-1845.
  32. Haninger, K., & Hammitt, J. (2011). Diminishing willingness to pay per quality-adjusted life year: Valuing acute foodborne illness. Risk Analysis, 31, 902-907.
  33. Hansson, S. (2016). How to be cautious but open to learning: Time to update biotechnology and GMO legislation. Risk Analysis, 36, 1513-1517.
  34. International Monetary Fund. (2014). Global Health Threats. Retrieved from https://imf.org/external/pubs/ft/fandd/2014/12/jonas/htm.
  35. Jagiello, R. D., & Hills, T. T. (2018). Bad news has wings: Dread risk mediates social amplification in risk communication. Risk Analysis, 38(10), 2193-2207.
  36. Jensen, J., Pokharel, M., Scherr, C., King, A., Brown, N., & Jones, C. (2017). Communicating uncertain science to the public: How amount and source of uncertainty impact fatalism, backlash, and overload. Risk Analysis, 37(1), 40-51.
  37. Jeone, J., Meza, R., Krapcho, M., Clarke, L., Byrne, J., & Levy, D. (2012). Actual and counterfactual smoking prevalence rates in the US population via microsimulation. Risk Analysis, 32(1), S51-S68.
  38. Jonas, S., Fronczyk, K., & Pratt, L. A. (2018). Framework to understand extreme space weather event probability. Risk Analysis, 38(8), 1534-1540.
  39. Kaplan, S., & Garrick, J. (1981). On the quantitative definition of Risk. Risk Analysis, 1(1), 11-27.
  40. Kasperson, R. (2017). Risk conundrums: Solving unsolvable problems. NY: Earthscan.
  41. Kazemi, R., & Mosleh, A. (2012). Improving default risk prediction using Bayesian model uncertainty techniques. Risk Analysis, 32(11), 1888-1900.
  42. Kendall-Taylor, A., Frantz, E., & Wright, J. (2020). The digital dictators: How technology strengthens autocracy. Foreign Affairs, 99(20), 103-115.
  43. Kent, A. (2004). A critical look at risk assessments for global catastrophes. Risk Analysis, 24(1), 157-168.
  44. Lathrop, J., & Ezell, B. (2016). Validation in the absence of observed events. Risk Analysis, 36(4), 653-665.
  45. Levy, J. (2016). Fine particulate matter, risk assessment, and risk management. Risk Analysis, 36(9), 1745-1747.
  46. Lin, Y. U., Margolin, D., & Wen, X. (2017). Tracking and analyzing individual distress following terrorist attacks using social media streams. Risk Analysis, 37(8), 1580-1605.
  47. Linkov, I., & Trump, B. (2019). The science and practice of resilience. New York: Springer..
  48. Lowther, S., Roesei, S., O'Connor, P., Landaverde, M., Oblapenko, G., Deshevoi, S., … Wassilak, S. (2013). World Health Organization regional assessments of the risks of poliovirus outbreaks. Risk Analysis, 33(4), 664-679.
  49. McDaniels, T, Mills, T, Gregory, R, & Ohlson, D. (2012). Exploring robust alternatives for climate adaptation in forest land management. Risk Analysis, 32(12), 2098-2012.
  50. Moolgavkar, S. H., Holford, T. R., Levy, D. T., Kong, C. Y., Foy, M., Clarke, L., … Kimmel, M. (2012). Impact of reduced tobacco smoking on lung cancer mortality in the United States during 1975-2000. Journal of the National Cancer Institute, 104, 541-548.
  51. Mukherjee, S., & Nateghi, R. (2019). A data-driven approach to assessing supply inadequacy risks due to climate-induced shifts in electricity demand. Risk Analysis, 39(3), 673-694.
  52. Nakayachi, K. (2013). The unintended effects of risk-refuting information on anxiety. Risk Analysis, 33(1), 80-91.
  53. National Highway Traffic Safety Administration. (2019). Distracted driving in fatal crashes, 2017. DOT HS 812 700.
  54. North, D. W. (2016). Introduction to special issue on air pollution health risks. Risk Analysis, 36(9), 1688-1692.
  55. OECD. Environmental-Economic Modelling. (2020). Retrieved from https://www.oecd.org/environment/modelling.htm
  56. Oughton, E., Hapgood, M., Richardson, G., Beggan, C., Thomson, A., Gibbs, M., … Horne, R. (2019). A risk assessment framework for the socio-economic impacts of electricity transmission infrastructure failure due to space weather: An application to the United Kingdom. Risk Analysis, 39(5), 1022-1043.
  57. Oviedo-Trespalacios, O., Haque, M., King, M., & Washington, S. (2018). Should I text or call here? A situation-based analysis of drivers perceived likelihood of engaging in mobile phone multitasking. Risk Analysis, 38(10), 2144-2160.
  58. Pasquali, S., Gilioli, G., Janssen, D., & Winter, S. (2015). Optimal strategies for interception, detection, and eradication in plant biosecurity. Risk Analysis, 35(9), 1663-1673.
  59. Paté-Cornell, E. (2012). “Black Swans” and “Perfect Storms”: Risk analysis and management when statistics are not enough. Risk Analysis, 32(11), 1823-1833.
  60. Pew Research Center. (2017). Trust, facts, and democracy. Retrieved from www.people-press.org/2017/10/05/7-global-warming-and-environmental-regulation-personal-environmentalism/.
  61. Reinhardt, J., Chen, X., Liu, W., Manchev, P., & Pate-Cornell, M. E. (2015). Asteroid risk assessment: A probabilistic approach. Risk Analysis, 36(2), 244-261.
  62. Renn, O. (2008). Risk governance. NY: Earthscan.
  63. Rios Aliaga, J. M. (2012). Adversarial risk analysis for counterterrorism modeling, Risk Analysis, 32(5), 894-915.
  64. Robinson, L., & Hammitt, J. (2011). Behavioral economics and regulatory analysis. Risk Analysis, 31(11), 1408-1422.
  65. Rothschild, C., McLay, L., & Guikema, S. (2012). Adversarial risk analysis with incomplete information: A level-k approach. Risk Analysis, 32(7), 1219-1231.
  66. Ryan, C., Murphy, F., & Mullin, M. (2018). Semiautonomous vehicle risk analysis: A telematics-based anomaly detection approach. Risk Analysis, 39(5), 1125-1140.
  67. Shatkin, J., & Ong, K. (2016). Alternative testing strategies for nano materials: State of the science and considerations for risk analysis. Risk Analysis, 36(8), 1564-1580.
  68. Shin, H. H., Cohen, A., Pope, C. A. III, Ezzati, M., Lim, S., Hubbell, B., & Burnett, R. (2016). Meta-Analysis methods to estimate the shape and uncertainty in the association between long-term exposure to ambient fine particulate matter and cause-specific mortality over the global concentration range. Risk Analysis, 36(9), 1813-1825.
  69. Smith, A. (2016a). Setting air quality standards for PM2.5: A role for subjective uncertainty in NAAQS quantitative risk assessments? Risk Analysis, 36(11), 2318-2339.
  70. Smith, A. (2016b). Inconsistencies in risk analyses for ambient air pollutant regulations. Risk Analysis, 36(9), 1737-1744.
  71. Snary, E., Swart, A., & Hald, T. (2016). Quantitative microbiological risk assessment and source attribution for Salmonella: Taking it further. Risk Analysis, 36(3), 433-436.
  72. Spence, A., Poortinga, W., & Pidgeon, W. (2012). The psychological distance of climate change. Risk Analysis, 32(6), 957-972.
  73. Suzuki, A. (2014). Managing the Fukushima challenge. Risk Analysis, 34(7), 1240-1256.
  74. Swart, A., van Leusden, F., & Nauta, M. (2016). A QMRA model for Salmonella in pork products during preparation and consumption. Risk Analysis, 36(3), 516-530.
  75. Sween, M., Ceschi, A., Tommasi, F., Sartori, R., & Weller, J. (2017). Who is a distracted driver? Associations between mobile phone use while driving, domain-specific risk-taking, and personality. Risk Analysis, 37(11), 2119-2133.
  76. Terpstra, T. (2011). Emotions, trust, and perceived risk: Affective and cognitive routes to flood preparedness behavior. Risk Analysis, 31, 1658-1675.
  77. Thatcher, J. (2014). Living on fumes: Digital footprints, data fumes, and the limitations of spatial big data. International Journal of Communications, 8, 1765-1783.
  78. Thompson, K. (2013). Modeling polio risks and the legacy of polio eradication. Risk Analysis, 33(4), 505-515.
  79. Trumbo, C., Meyer, M., Marlatt, H., Peek, L., & Morissey, B. (2014). An assessment of change in risk perception and optimistic bias for hurricanes among Gulf Coast residents. Risk Analysis, 34(6), 1013-1024.
  80. United States Environmental Protection Agency (EPA), Office of Planning and Evaluation. (1987). Unfinished business: A comparative assessment of environmental problems. Pub number 000 R87901. Washington, DC: EPA.
  81. Vainio, A., Paloniemi, R., & Varho, V. (2017). Weighing the risks of nuclear energy and climate change: Trust in different information sources, perceived risks, and willingness to pay for alternatives to nuclear power. Risk Analysis, 37, 557-569.
  82. Vandoros, S., Kavetsos, G., & Dolan, P. (2013). Greasy roads: The impact of bad financial news on road traffic accidents. Risk Analysis, 34(3), 556-566.
  83. Visschers, V. H. M., & Siegrist, M. (2013). How a nuclear power plant accident influences acceptance of nuclear power: Results of a longitudinal study before and after the Fukushima disaster. Risk Analysis, 33, 333-347.
  84. Wachinger, G., Renn, O., Begg, C., & Kuhlicke, C. (2013). The risk perception paradox-implications for governance and communication of natural hazards. Risk Analysis, 33, 1049-1065.
  85. Wang, C., & Bier, V. (2016). Quantifying adversary capabilities to inform resource allocation. Risk Analysis, 36(4), 756-775.
  86. Weinberg, A. M. (1981). Reflections on risk assessment. Risk Analysis, 1(1), 5-7.
  87. White, M., Eiser, J. R., & Harris, P. (2004). Risk perceptions of mobile phone use while driving. Risk Analysis, 24(2), 323-334.
  88. World Health Organization(WHO). (2007.) Global Public Health Threats in the 21st Century. Retrieved from http://www.who.int/uhr.2007/overview/en/index1.html2t/20
  89. Xie, K., Ozbay, K., Kurkcu, A., & Yang, H. (2017). Analysis of traffic crashes involving pedestrians using big data: Investigations of contributing factors and identification of hot spots. Risk Analysis, 37(8), 1459-1476.
  90. Yin, H., Pfaff, A., & Kunreuther, H. (2011). Can environmental insurance succeed where other strategies fail? The case of underground storage tanks. Risk Analysis, 31(1), 12-24.
  91. Young, R., & Schreiner, C. (2009). Real world personal conversations using a hands-free embedded wireless device while driving: Effect on airbag deployment crash rates. Risk Analysis, 29(2), 187-204.
  92. Yu, J. Z., & Baroud, H. (2019). Quantifying community resilience using hierarchical Bayesian kernel methods: A case study on recovery from power outages. Risk Analysis, 39(9), 1930-1948.
  93. Zhang, Q., Li, J., Middleton, A., Bhattacharya, S., & Conolly, R. (2018). Bridging the data gap from in vitro toxicity testing to chemical safety assessment through computational modeling. Frontiers in Public Health, 6, 261.
  94. Zheng, K., & Albert, L. (2019). A robust approach or mitigating risks in cyber supply chains. Risk Analysis, 39(9), 2076-2092.
  95. Zhou, Y., Sheu, J.-B., & Wang, J. (2017). Robustness assessment of urban road network with consideration of multiple hazard events. Risk Analysis, 37(8), 1477-1494.
Journal Article
Article has an altmetric score of 13

Word Cloud

Created with Highcharts 10.0.0RiskaccomplishmentsriskanalysismajorAnalysis:10challengespartcelebration40thanniversarySocietyAnalysisInternationalJournalessayreviewsimportant19802010outlinesthreecategories20112019discusseseditorscirculateauthors'proposesrisk-related2020-2030AuthorsconcludenextdecadewillseverelytestfieldCelebratingAccomplishmentsEmbracingOngoingChallenges

Similar Articles

Cited By