Bipolar Pulsed Radiofrequency for Trigeminal Neuralgia: A Report of Two Cases.

Victor Silva, Miles Day, Margarita Santiago
Author Information
  1. Victor Silva: Pain Management Center, Centro Medico Zambrano Hellion, San Pedro Garza García, Nuevo Leon, Mexico. ORCID
  2. Miles Day: Pain Research, The Pain Center at Grace Clinic, Texas Tech University HSC, Lubbock, Texas, U.S.A.
  3. Margarita Santiago: Pain Management Center, Centro Medico Zambrano Hellion, San Pedro Garza García, Nuevo Leon, Mexico.

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Trigeminal neuralgia (TN) is the most common cause of facial pain, leading to significant disability and impacting a patient's quality of life. Percutaneous procedures like continuous radiofrequency, pulsed radiofrequency (PRF), and combined continuous and pulsed radiofrequency have been studied in past years comparing different voltages in order to find more effective therapies with fewer complications (eg, numbness and masseter muscle weakness). With regard to young patients, there is still insufficient evidence on the most appropriate procedure in this patient population. PRF does not cause thermal damage. The mechanism of action involves delivering an electrical field to targeted nerves or tissues, modulating pain. We propose that bipolar pulsed radiofrequency (2 parallel cannulas) in the trigeminal ganglion produce a denser and larger field resulting in more effective controlled pain.
CASE PRESENTATION: We present 2 cases of 40- and 48-year-old men with severe V2 to V3 TN who underwent bipolar PRF. We performed bipolar PRF on the trigeminal ganglion through the foramen ovale using two 22-gauge 100-mm cannulas with 10-mm active tips. Parameters used were voltage of 85 V, pulse width of 20 milliseconds, and total duration time of 6 minutes. Both patients reported complete relief of pain after the procedure, and at 2-year follow-up they were pain free and experienced a better quality of life. No complications were reported.
CONCLUSION: Bipolar PRF could be a non-neurodestructive option for young people with TN and deserves further investigation as a treatment option.

Keywords

References

  1. Olesen J. Headache classification committee of the international headache society (IHS) the international classification of headache disorders. Cephalalgia. 2018;38:1-211.
  2. Di Stefano G, Truini A, Cruccu G. Current and innovative pharmacological options to treat typical and atypical trigeminal neuralgia. Drugs. 2018;78:1433-1442.
  3. Yao P, Hong T, Zhu Y, et al. Efficacy and safety of continuous radiofrequency thermocoagulation plus pulsed radiofrequency for treatment of V1 trigeminal neuralgia. Medicine. 2016;95:19-22.
  4. Ding W, Chen S, Wang R, et al. Percutaneous radiofrequency thermocoagulation for trigeminal neuralgia using neuronavigation guided puncture from a mandibular angle. Medicine. 2016;95:1-8.
  5. Elawamy A, Abdalla EE, Shehata GA. Effects of pulsed versus conventional versus combined radiofrequency for the treatment of trigeminal neuralgia: a prospective study. Pain Physician. 2017;20:E873-E881.
  6. Luo F, Meng L, Wang T, Jingjing Lu, Nan Ji. Comparison of high voltage with standard-voltage pulsed radiofrequency of Gasserian ganglion in the treatment of idiopathic trigeminal neuralgia. Pain Pract. 2014;15:595-603.
  7. Ding Y, Li H, Hong T, Zhu Y, Yao P, Zhou G. Combination of pulsed radiofrequency with continuous radiofrequency thermocoagulation at low temperature improves efficacy and safety in V2/V3 primary trigeminal neuralgia. Pain Physician. 2018;21:E545-E553.
  8. Lopes DM, Denk F, McMahon SB. The molecular fingerprint of dorsal root and trigeminal ganglion neurons. Front Mol Neurosci. 2017;10:1-11.
  9. Megat S, Ray PR, Tavares-Ferreira D, et al. Differences between dorsal root and trigeminal ganglion nociceptors in mice revealed by translational profiling. J Neurosci. 2019;39:6829-6847.
  10. Chua NHL, Vissers KC, Sluijter ME. Pulsed radiofrequency treatment in interventional pain management: mechanisms and potential indications-a review. Acta Neurochir. 2011;153:763-771.
  11. Van Boxem K, Huntoon M, Van Zundert J, Patijn J, Van Kleef M, Joosten EA. Pulsed radiofrequency: a review of the basic science as applied to the pathophysiology of radicular pain: a call for clinical translation. Reg Anesth Pain Med. 2014;39:149-159.
  12. Chang MC, Cho YW, Ahn SH. Comparison between bipolar pulsed radiofrequency and monopolar pulsed radiofrequency in chronic lumbosacral radicular pain: a randomized controlled trial. Medicine. 2017;96:1-6.
  13. Lee DG, Cho YW, Ahn SH, Chang MC. The effect of bipolar pulsed radiofrequency treatment on chronic lumbosacral radicular pain refractory to monopolar pulsed radiofrequency treatment. Pain Physician. 2018;21:E97-E103.
  14. Huang B, Xie K, Chen Y, Wu J, Yao M. Bipolar radiofrequency ablation of mandibular branch for refractory V3 trigeminal neuralgia. J Pain Res. 2019;12:1465-1474.
  15. Wan CF, Liu Y, Dong DS, et al. Bipolar high-voltage, long-duration pulsed radiofrequency improves pain relief in postherpetic neuralgia. Pain Physician. 2016;19:E721-E728.
  16. Cosman ER Jr, Dolensky JR, Hoffman RA. Factors that affect radiofrequency heat lesion size. Pain Med. 2014;15:2020-2036.
  17. Provenzano DA, Lutton EM, Somers DL. The effects of fluid injection on lesion size during bipolar radiofrequency treatment. Reg Anesth Pain Med. 2012;37:267-276.
  18. Erdine S, Bilir A, Cosman ER, Cosman ER Jr. Ultrastructural changes in axons following exposure to pulsed radiofrequency fields. Pain Pract. 2009;9:407-417.

MeSH Term

Adult
Humans
Male
Middle Aged
Pain Management
Pulsed Radiofrequency Treatment
Quality of Life
Treatment Outcome
Trigeminal Neuralgia

Word Cloud

Created with Highcharts 10.0.0painradiofrequencyPRFpulsedbipolartrigeminalTNganglionTrigeminalneuralgiacausequalitylifecontinuouseffectivecomplicationsyoungpatientsprocedurefield2cannulasreportedBipolaroptionBACKGROUND:commonfacialleadingsignificantdisabilityimpactingpatient'sPercutaneousprocedureslikecombinedstudiedpastyearscomparingdifferentvoltagesorderfindtherapiesfeweregnumbnessmassetermuscleweaknessregardstillinsufficientevidenceappropriatepatientpopulationthermaldamagemechanismactioninvolvesdeliveringelectricaltargetednervestissuesmodulatingproposeparallelproducedenserlargerresultingcontrolledCASEPRESENTATION:presentcases40-48-year-oldmensevereV2V3underwentperformedforamenovaleusingtwo22-gauge100-mm10-mmactivetipsParametersusedvoltage85 Vpulsewidth20 millisecondstotaldurationtime6 minutescompleterelief2-yearfollow-upfreeexperiencedbetterCONCLUSION:non-neurodestructivepeopledeservesinvestigationtreatmentPulsedRadiofrequencyNeuralgia:ReportTwoCases

Similar Articles

Cited By